Category Archives: Innovative Biofibers from Renewable Resources

Pineapple Fibers

Natural Cellulose Fibers from Renewable Resources

Keywords

Pineapple leave • Yarn processing • Yarn properties

10.1 Extracting Fibers from Pineapple Plant Residues

Pineapple (Ananas comosus) belongs to the Bromeliaceae family and is a short tropical plant that grows to 1-2 m in height and width. About 21.9 million tons of pineapples were produced in the world in 2011 [14FAO]. As seen from Fig. 10.1, pineapple plants consist of a rosette of 20-30 leaves that are generally 6 cm wide and up to 1 m long. About 96-100 tons of fresh leaves are generated per hectare. Fresh pineapple leaves yield about 2.5-3.5 % fibers that are white, creamy, and silk like with a soft texture and also absorb high amounts of moisture [12Nad]. Fibers obtained from pineapple leaves are composed of relatively higher amounts of cellulose (74 %), lignin (10.4 %), and ash (4.7 %) [12Nad]. Pineapple leaf fibers (PALF) fibers are reported to have a microfibrillar angle of 14° that results in lower elongation. Traditionally, fibers are manually extracted from pineapple leaves by scrapping the outer layers. During the last decade, decorticating machines have been developed that can process about 35 kg of fibers per 8 h shift.

In a study, the influence of various chemical modifications on the morphological and physical properties of pineapple leaf fibers was studied [12Man]. To extract finer fibers, pineapple leaves were cut to 25 cm length, soaked in 10 % NaOH at 30 °C for 2 h, and later washed in water. Fibers were also bleached using 0.4 % sodium hypochlorite at pH4 at 85-90 °C for 90 min. In addition, acetylation and grafting of acrylonitrile were also done [12Man]. Fibers with diameters between 30 and 40 pm were selected and tested for their tensile properties. Table 10.1 shows the properties of the PALF before and after various modifications. Treating the fibers with acetic acid resulted in drastic loss in tensile properties, whereas grafting improved the tensile strength and elongation. Morphologically, fibers became

Fig. 10.1 Various parts of a pineapple plant

Table 10.1 Tensile properties of chemically modified pineapple leaf fibers

Type of chemical treatment

Tensile properties

Strength [g/den]

Elongation [%]

Modulus [g/den]

Acetylated fibers

1.1

16.7

23.1

Scoured fibers

1.3

15.6

36.2

AN-grafted

1.6

12.8

53.1

20 % Acetic acid

0.3

7.6

22.3

10 % NaOH

1.2

13.4

31.5

Bleached fibers

1.3

14.5

35.4

Raw fibers

1.4

11.6

51.5

Reproduced from [12Man]

image15"smooth after the chemical/physical modifications. Unmodified fibers had a crystallinity of about 66 %, but grafting with acrylonitrile resulted in a decrease of crystallinity to 41 %. Table 10.2 lists some of the properties of pineapple leaf fibers.

Fibers were extracted from the pineapple crown by treating with 1 % alkali solution for potential use as reinforcement for polypropylene [11Sip]. Untreated and treated fibers had % crystallinity of 42 % and 38 %, respectively, and showed peaks belonging to cellulose I and cellulose IV [11Sip]. In a study to understand the

Table 10.2 Properties of fibers obtained from pineapple leaves [12Ken]

Density

Diameter [pm]

Strength [g/den]

Elongation [%]

Modulus [g/den]

1.10

59.4 ± 16.1

4.9 ± 2.3

11 ± 3

54.6 ± 23.8

1.44

9-59

3.2-12.5

1.6

265-634

Table 10.3 Properties of pineapple leaf fibers obtained from various varieties of pineapple trees

Variety

Tensile strength [g/den]

Modulus

[g/den]

Fiber cross-sectional area [pm2]

Crystallinity

index

A

5.3 ± 1.7

320 ± 77

3.7 ± 0.86

58.6

B

2.9 ± 1.4

198 ± 78

3.8 ± 2.9

50

C

1.6 ± 1.4

118 ± 59

8.0 ± 4.4

48.7

D

4.4 ± 2.1

292±125

2.6 ± 1.4

64.4

E

4.2 ± 1.9

288±183

4.4 ± 3.0

58.8

F

5.3 ± 2.6

401±176

3.5 ± 1.8

59.2

From [13Net]

influence of variety of plant on fiber properties, leaves from six varieties of pineapple grown in Brazil were manually extracted and studied for their morpho­logical and physical properties. Considerable variations in properties were found for the fibers extracted from the different varieties of pineapples [13Net]. Some of the varieties of pineapple plants and the properties of the fibers obtained and their variations are listed in Table 10.3. Strength and modulus of the fibers vary by more than three times, mainly due to the different cross-sectional areas. Fibers that had larger cross-sectional areas tend to have lower strength and modulus due to the higher probability of defective places. In addition, the composition of the fibers would also have played a role in determining the tensile properties, and it may not be appropriate to compare fibers with different compositions and unit areas. In a similar study, it was found that alkali treatment to various extents resulted in the fineness of the fibers to vary from 20 to 15 denier, and tenacity ranged from 2.2 to 4.7 g/den [11Li].

Pineapple leaves were mechanically and chemically treated, and the changes in diameter of the fibers were related to tensile properties. As seen in Table 10.4, finer fibers (72.7 pm) obtained by mechanical abrasion with grade 100 abrasive paper had 250 % higher strength than the non-treated fibers. Similarly, bleaching with hypochlorite solution reduced fiber diameters but also decreased the tensile properties. Increase in fiber crystallinity was thought to be the major contributing factor to increase in tensile strength after various treatments.

Ananas erectifolius, a plant similar to that of pineapple and commonly called as curaua, has been used to extract natural cellulose fibers [09Spi]. The plant is commonly found in the Amazon regions of Brazil and grows 1.5—1.7 m long and

4 cm wide leaves which are used to extract fibers. The density of the fibers was between 1.1 and 1.2 g/cm3, average diameter of the fibers was 60 pm, and moisture absorption varied from 9.2 to 12.1 %. The strength of the fibers varied from 2.7 to 6.9 g/den, modulus ranged from 115 to 308 g/den, and elongation varied from 3 to

5 % depending on the treatments used for the fibers [09Spi].

Table 10.4 Variations in the diameter and tensile properties of pineapple leaf fibers obtained after various physical and chemical treatments [10Moh]

Treatment

Diameter

[pm]

Tensile strength [g/den]

Elongation

[%]

Modulus

[g/den]

Non-treated

241.9

1.5

7.8

27

Water soaked

235.3

1.5

8.4

22

Abrasive

separated

121.7

2.3

6.6

40

Fine strands

72.7

3.9

8.7

63

Bleach 1 % (2 h)

246.9

1.7

9.1

22

Bleach 1 % (4 h)

157.4

1.8

6.3

39

Bleach 1 % (6 h)

171.2

1.8

5.7

47

Bleach 2 % (4 h)

177

1.7

4.1

60

Microfluidic Spinning of Alginate Fibers

Chitin, Chitosan, and Alginate Fibers

Keywords

Microfluidic spinning • Fiber alignment • Grooved fiber • Tissue engineering • Scaffold • Cell orientation • Cell proliferation

A novel microfluidic spinning method was used to develop flat alginate fibers with grooves for cell scaffolding [12Kan] instead of using the traditional approach of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) for topological construction of tissue engineering scaffolds. As seen in Fig. 33.1, thin flat fibers with diameters less than 10 pm were continuously fabricated by passing the alginate solution through channels containing calcium chloride. Fibers with various diameters and widths were obtained by changing the flow rate, and the fibers formed were wound continuously onto spools. SEM images of the smooth and grooved flat fibers are shown in Fig. 33.2. Figure 33.2c shows the fibers with 5 and 7 grooves obtained by changing the pattern on the sample channel. Fibers with different number of grooves on each side were also produced as seen in Fig. 33.2g. This approach of fiber formation allowed precise control of dimensions and enabled fabrication of scaffolds that could regulate cellular morphogenesis [12Kan]. The fibers developed were used to culture neuron cells, and the cell attachment, proliferation, and alignment were studied. The cells migrated to the sides of the smooth fibers and along the ridges of the grooved fibers as seen in Fig. 33.3i. As seen in the fluorescent and SEM images, cluster of cells were seen growing on the ridges of the fibers, and the cells were connected by neurites along the length of the grooves unlike the cells on the smooth fibers where the neurites formed a random network. Similar accu­mulation and alignment of cells in the grooves were also found for myoblast cells. The ability to guide the morphogenesis of cells and achieve topographic control over cell alignment was perceived to be crucial to reconnect muscle tissues and for other tissue engineering applications. In a similar approach, a microfluidic device was used for continuous (on the fly) production of calcium alginate fibers © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

N. Reddy, Y. Yang, Innovative Biofibers from Renewable Resources, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-45136-

[07Shi]. Basically, a poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) microfluidic device embed­ded with a glass capillary pipet was used for fiber production. Sodium alginate solution was introduced in the sample flow, and calcium chloride solution was introduced as the sheath liquid. Sufficient time is allowed for the fibers to

image64

Fig. 33.3 Alignment of cells on the grooved alginate fibers. (h) shows that the cells are oriented and grow along the grooves. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier [12Kan]

precipitate by changing the length of the outlet pipet. Mouse fibroblasts and bovine serum albumin-fluorescein isothiocyanate were loaded into the fiber during fiber production to evaluate the suitability of the fiber production method for medical applications. Cells loaded onto the fibers survived the production process and were embedded inside and had about 80 % viability after 24 h suggesting that the process could be useful to load therapeutic materials and for delivery of drugs.

References

[07Shi] Shin, S., Park, J., Lee, J., Park, H., Park, Y., Lee, K., Whang, C., Lee, S.: Langmuir 23, 9104 (2007)

[12Kan] Kang, E., Choi, Y. Y., Chae, S., Moon, J., Chang, J., Lee, S.: Adv. Mater. 24, 4271 (2012)

Electrospun Cellulose Fibers

Although cellulose is extensively available and has been used as fibers in native and regenerated form, it is difficult to dissolve cellulose in electrospinnable solvents and therefore there are limited reports on producing electrospun cellulose fibers. Ionic liquids that have been used to dissolve cellulose and produce regenerated fibers have also been used to develop electrospun fibers [08Xu]. Cotton linters with a degree of polymerization of 1,600 were dissolved using 1-allyl-3-methylimi — dazolium chloride (AMIMCl) and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) by stirring at 80 °C for 1 h. Fibers with diameters ranging from 100 to 800 nm were obtained using solution concentrations from 3 to 5 %. Addition of DMSO decreased the surface tension, entanglement density, and viscosity of the solution leading to the formation of nanofibers. Cellulose in the electrospun fibers had low crystallinity

image135

Fig. 58.13 Confocal images showing the morphologies of the 3T3 fibroblasts at different locations and depths on the fibronectin coated on derivatized hyaluronic acid [06Ji] (a) is the morphology of the cells on FN-adsorbed cover slips; (b) is below the surface of FN-adsorbed HA-DTPH scaffold; (c) on the surface of FN-adsorbed HA-DTPH scaffolds and (d) is 32 pm below the surface of the FN-adsorbed DTPH scaffold

image136

Fig. 58.14 Image of the hyaluronic acid/collagen blend scaffold obtained after electrospinning. From Kim et al. [08Kim]. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier

and was considered to be in the cellulose II form. Cellulose was dissolved in [Bmim][Cl] and heparin was added for potential use of the fibers for construction of artificial blood vessels [06Vis]. Although limited information was presented on the properties of the fibers, it was reported that heparin retained the anticoagulant property even after high voltage electrospinning.

image137

Fig. 58.15 Actual structure and morphology of the hyaluronic/collagen blend scaffold after washing and salt leaching. From Kim et al. [08Kim]. (a) digital image of the scaffold; (b) surface morphology; (c and d) SEM images at two different magnification. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier