Category Archives: BIOGAS

Awareness and cost of installing biogas facility

Findings show that one household plant could cost USD 550- 675 with wide standard deviation suggesting a high variation for the cost of installation depending on the expertise availability and the size of the biogas facility. The size for biogas plants ranged from 6­12m3.

poor (p<2%) categories. However, there was no significant difference of cost of installation between the less poor and the poor respondents. A major explanation to this is that a high proportion of the slightly well off respondents benefited from the pilot project in 1996 when the biogas facilities were installed at half cost by the Danish volunteers. This was a strategy used to sensitise and raise awareness and demand for the biogas facilities. Unfortunately, many people from the less poor and the poor categories could not take up this opportunity because of many reasons, one of them being risk averse. They wanted to learn from others how it worked and what the advantages were to be. However, by the time they were convinced by the technology and started adopting it, the price had gone back to the market price levels. Another reason for not adopting it during the promotion period was that they had other more pressing issues than biogas, such as a need for cash to carter farming activities and paying for education and health services. Various studies have shown that poor people are always risk averse and therefore it takes time for them to adopt a new technology. Many of the studies about technology adoption conclude that the pace of adopting a new technology in developing countries has been slow among the poor.[20] Feder et al., (1985) have identified factors such as aversion to risk and limited access to information as reasons that could partly explain why adoption is slow. Individual characteristics such as education, access to credit, the capacity to bear risk, availability of other inputs and access to information may play a big role in the adoption of the technology.

Wealth Category

Slightly Well-off

Less Poor

Comparison 1

Slightly Well-off

Less Poor

Level of significance

550

635

**

(215)

(125)

Comparison 2

Less Poor

The Poor

670

675

NS

(192)

(250)

Comparison 3

Slightly Well-off

The Poor

550

(250)

675

(176)

***

NS =not significant, ** Significant at p<5%, *** Significant at p<2%

Table 5. A comparison of cost (USD) of installation across wealth ranks

The worksheet G 486 «Gas quantity measurement, compressibility factors and gas law deviation factors of natural gases, calculation and application» from the DVGW regulations

The determination of gas quantity, or volume is carried out under operating conditions (metering conditions). The result is an operational flow VB (TB, PB) as a function of temperature and pressure. This operational flow needs to be converted to standard conditions (TN = 0 ° C, pN = 1.01325 bar) in order to compare volumes and so that it can be used as an input for gas billing. Since the model for an ideal gas is only approximately valid for real gases at low pressures, a compressibility factor Z (T, p, xi) is introduced into the equation of state for ideal gases. The compressibility factor is mathematically approximated by a series expansion of the molar density (virial approach). The calculation of standard volume is thus given by equation 8. 3:

V(TN > Pn ) = TnPb Zn (3)

V(TB, Pb) TbPn Zb

The ratio of the compressibility factors is called the gas law deviation factor.

Two methods for calculating compressibility factors are given in G 486 including the supplementary sheets: The standard GERG-88 virial equation and the AGA8-DC92 equation of state. The former requires input parameters of p, T, HS, N, p, xCO2 and XH2, the latter the mole fractions. The AGA8 equation of state requires a full analysis by means of a process gas chromatograph.

Economic factors which affect biogas production and commercialisation

The economy of a biogas plant consists of large investments costs, some operation and maintenance costs, mostly free raw materials, e. g., animal dung, water, aquatic weeds, terrestrial plants, sewage sludge, industrial wastes, agricultural wastes and income from sale of biogas or electricity and heat (Amigun and von Blottnitz, 2007). The economics of biogas production and consumption is dependent on a number of factors specific to the local situation, as shown in Table 4. The economics of biogas production and use, therefore, depends upon the specific country and project situation

a. Cost of biomass material, which varies among countries depending on land availability, agricultural productivity, labour costs, etc

b. Biogas production costs, which depends on the plant location, size and technology, which vary among countries

c. The cost of corresponding fossil fuel (gasoline, diesel) in individual countries

d. The strategic benefit of substituting imported petroleum with domestic resources____

Table 4. Economic factors which affect biogas production and commercialisation

The main limitations to the adoption of large-scale biogas technology are both institutional and economic. Establishing a self-sustaining institutional system that can collect and process urban waste and effectively market the generated biogas fuel is a complex activity that calls for sophisticated organisational capability and initiative (Karekezi, 1994b). The energy transition in Africa is an incremental process and not a leapfrog process, dependent upon household, national and regional accumulations of technological capabilities. Biogas technology absorption, therefore, cannot occur without the proper social, cultural, political and economic institutions to support adoption, dissemination and appropriate contextual innovation (Murphy, 2001). The Taka Gas Project in Tanzania (Mbuligwe and Kassenga, 2004) is a very good example of how large-scale biogas technology projects have failed to take off in Africa. The main objective of the Taka Gas Project was to obtain biogas through anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste from Dar es Salaam city and serve as a model for other urban areas in Africa to emulate. The project was well prepared with analysis of solid waste as feedstock for the project, strategies for operationalising the project, environmental impacts and economic feasibility and other technical and non-technical and socio-economic issues studied for the project but it has never took off the ground due to bureaucracy.

The investment cost of even the smallest of the biogas units is prohibitive for most rural households of sub-Saharan Africa. Evidence from the experiences in Eastern and Southern African countries is still limited, but the general consensus is that the larger combined septic tank/biogas units that are run by institutions such as hospitals and schools have proved to be more viable than the small-scale household bio-digesters. There is need for subsidy-led programmes which will be demand-driven and market-oriented to increase the adoption of biogas plants. Subsidies are justified to make up for the difference between ability to pay and the higher societal benefits (maintenance of forest cover, prevention of land degradation, and reduction in emissions of greenhouse gases) and private benefits (reduction in expenditure for firewood and kerosene, savings in time for cooking and firewood collection and health) accruing to users. Besides the expense, many consumers are hesitant to adopt the biogas technology reflecting the lack of public awareness of the relevant issues. To date, this combination of factors has largely stifled the use of biogas technology in Africa.

Two-phase Olive Mill Solid Waste (OMSW)

The OMSW used for the experiments was collected from a two-phase technology mill. The OMSW was derived from olives with a high ripening index (6.5) and an intense purple colour. Before use the small stone pieces were removed by sieving the OMSW through a 3.15 and 2.00 mm sieve. Two influent substrate concentrations were used for the experiments: 35 g COD/L (OMSW 1) and 150 g COD/L (OMSW 2). These concentrations were obtained by dilution of the collected waste. The features and composition of these two- phase OMSWs are summarised in Table 1.

Units

OMSW 1

OMSW 2

pH

*

5.6

5.8

COD

g O2/L

35

150

SCOD

g O2/L

15

67

TVFA

g acetic acid/L

0.70

2.90

Alkalinity

g CaCO3/L

0.74

2.20

TS

g/L

40.2

165.3

MS

g/L

5.6

21.1

VS

g/ L

34.6

144.2

TSS

g/ L

35.2

142.2

MSS

g/ L

4.1

15.7

VSS

g/ L

31.1

126.5

Total phenolic compounds

g caffeic acid/L

0.61

2.44

COD: total chemical oxygen demand; SCOD: soluble chemical oxygen demand; TVFA: total volatile fatty acids (as acetic acid); Alkalinity (as CaCO3). Values are averages of five determinations; there was virtually no variation (less than 3 %) between analyses.

Table 1. Composition and features of the OMSWs.

Adverse production-load situations (summer-winter)

image023

Fig. 2. Total load/feed-in (blue), industrial (RLM) and small consumer load (red) vs. time (hours) of a big city

In certain areas the biogas feed-in in the network is in wintertime only a small percentage and the area of influence is therefore small, too; but it is large in summertime. This fact principally leads to problems in pipeline connection, operation, constant gas quality delivery and fair billing (see below, Operational Aspects). In the future — when the number of plants and/or biogas production will increase — we will expect a considerable higher impact on network operation and surveillance tasks.

Application of ADM1 model for simulation of organic solid waste

Parameters

Middle

Minimum Maximum

Stand. Dev.

Num. samples

Sludge

pH

7.3

6.7

7.9

0.34

36

NH4+ (mg N/l)

3.9

1

13

4

24

TKN (mg N/l)

43.1

31.2

49.9

8.23

16

COD (mg COD/l)

670.7

596.8

748

44.49

16

Ptot (mg P/g TS)

603.4

241.7

770.6

149.73

10

TS (g/l)

35.6

26.6

47.5

4.67

36

TVS (g/l)

23.1

17.2

31.1

3.05

36

TVS sludge (%ST)

64.8

58.3

80.9

4.35

36

Flow (m3/ day)

0.019

0.019

0.019

0.00

45

Waste

TKN (mg N/l)

33.3

21.9

53.5

8.30

13

TCOD (mg COD/l)

996.2

829.7

1124.4

78.26

16

Ptot (mg P/g ST)

831.1

183.3

1540.9

411.99

11

TS (g/l)

160.2

72

269.9

56.42

38

TVS (g/l)

141.6

61.5

245.5

51.07

38

TVS (%TS)

89.4

73.7

94.7

4.28

38

Flow (m3/ day)

0.0032

0.0023

0.0036

0.00

45

Waste mixed with sludge

TKN (mg N/l)

41,7

29,9

50,4

TCOD (mg COD/l)

717,6

630,3

802,2

Ptot (mg P/g ST)

636,2

233,3

881,5

TS (g/l)

53,5

33,1

79,5

TVS (g/l)

40,2

23,6

62,0

TVS (%TS)

68,3

60,5

82,9

Waste (m3/day)

0.0032

0.0023

0.0036

Table 2. Influent characteristics

Parameters

Middle

Minimum

Maximum

Stand. Dev.

Num. samp

pH

7.84

7.6

8.1

0.10

44

NH4+ (mg N/l)

1022.1

900

1140

70

24

TKN (mg N/l)

37.8

28.7

49.1

5.45

9

TCOD(kg COD/m3)

22.2

18.3

24.7

1.92

16

SCOD (kg COD/m3)

4,6

2

7

2.07

5

Ptot (mg P/g ST)

752.2

383

1080.8

181.22

12

TS (g/l)

33.1

26.3

52.3

5.01

40

TVS (g/l)

18.9

15.5

26.8

2.18

40

TVS (% TS)

57.2

50

64.3

3.82

40

VFA (mg COD/l)

50.7

7.0

110.3

26.47

36

TA at pH 6 (mg CaCO3/l)

2466.7

2181.5

2911

186.67

44

TA at pH 4 (mg CaCO3/l)

4005.5

3806.4

4356

135.07

44

effluent flow (m3/day)

0.0225

0.0225

0.0225

0.00

45

Table 3. Effluent characteristics

Parameters
Biogas volume
(m3/day)

Подпись: Middle Minimum Maximum Stand. Dev. Num. samp 0.431 0.153 0.728 0.16 31 0.51 0.26 1.06 0.16 29 0.96 0.34 1.62 0.35 31 60.6 55 65 2.22 40 39.4 35 45 2.22 40 0.3 0.09 0.44 0.10 31 0.17 0.06 0.28 0.06 31 440 200 1044 204.91 31 SGP (m3 biog/kg TVS)
GPR

(m3 biogas/m3 day)

% CH4 (%)

% CO2 (%)
Volume of CH4
(m3/day)
Volume of CO2
(m3/days)

H2S (ppm)

Kinetic

Names

Units

Initial values

Initial

Estimate

parameter

used in

values

d values

s

ADM1

Kdis

Disintegration constant

Day-1

0.5b

0.7

0.7

Khyd. Ch

Carbohydrate hydrolysis

Day-1

10b

1.25a

1.0

Khyd. Pr

constant

Day-1

10b

0.5a

0.7

Khyd. Li

Proteins hydrolysis

Day-1

10b

0.4a

1.0

Table 4. Characteristics of biogas production

constant

Lipids hydrolysis

constant

a Middle values obtained from (Mata-Alvarez, 2003) b Values obtained from (Batstone and Keller, 2003)

image050

Table 5. Initial and estimated values of kinetic parameters

image051

Fig. 8. Comparison between the simulation and the experimental TVFA

However the simulated results of SCOD are somehow underestimated in comparison with the experimental ones. This may be explained by the fact that the substrate distribution between proteins, carbohydrates and lipids was not measured but default model values were adopted for this parameter.

The simulated TVFA results show good digester stability and are in good agreement with the experimental ones as well.

Figure 9 shows variation of the experimental and simulated results of total biogas volume produced, which depends on the nature, the composition and the biodegradability of solids. In this case, mass loading fluctuate as shown by the ORL, it should be underlined that the main objective of these experiments was to increase the ORL to the practical limits in order to treat a maximum quantity of solid waste however it was difficult to maintain it constant. Consequently these variations condition the tendency of biogas volume produced variation. The limitations of ADM1 imply that the simulated biogas production follows an average course; therefore, the simulated data overlaps partially the experimental values.

Figure 10 shows the experimental and simulated results of biogas production. The biogas is composed principally of methane and carbon dioxide and a small percentage of hydrogen. It can be noticed that the simulated results are in good agreement with the experimental ones. A similar remark concerning the average course of the curve can be held as well. Moreover, they show a good stability in the operating of the reactor

To have a clear picture of what is happening within the system, inorganic carbon (IC) and inorganic nitrogen (IN) as well as pH, were represented on the same graph as presented in Figure 11.

Since pH is approximately equal to 8, IC represents alkalinity. Any variation in alkalinity is due to neutralisation of VFA, if accumulated. Furthermore, alkalinity or IC is more sensitive to VFA accumulation than pH and therefore more reliable.

image052

4

 

It is noted that in this study, the simulated results show an acceptable fit for Total chemical oxygene demand (COD), biogas volume and composition, pH and inorganic nitrogen (IN). However, for inorganic carbon (IC), the simulated results do not show a good fit. It was confirmed that IC or bicarbonate alkalinity is a very sensitive parameter to volatile fatty acids (VFA) accumulation, compared to pH variations and hence it can be used as a monitoring parameter.

Substrates and metabolism

The metabolism of carbon during fermentation process towards hydrogen is based on transformation of pyruvate in presence of majority of microorganisms active in this reaction. The first step of dark fermentation is based on glycolysis occurying in cytosol of cell, also known as Embden-Mayerhof-Parnas (EMP) pathway (Stryer, 1999). This pathway is
initiated by one molecule of glucose, catalyzed by different enzymes and further transformed into 2 molecules of pyruvate. The energy liberated during oxidation of 3- phosphoglycerol aldehyde is sufficient for phosphorylation of generated acid towards 1,3- bisphosphoglycerol and reduction of NAD+ to NADH. This reaction is catalyzed by 3- phosphoglycerol dehydrogenase. Transformation of glucose to pyruvate is during glycolysis is accompanied by formation two molecules of ATP and two molecules of NADH.

Glucose is not the only substrate in glycolysis. Simple sugars such as fructose or galactose as well as complex sucrose — saccharose, lactose, maltose, cellobiose or cellulose can be used as the initial substrate for glycolysis. However, the incorporation of these complex sugars into glycolysis pathway require initial hydrolysis to the simple carbohydrates.

Glycerol can be considred as a good substarate for glycolysis. A part of glycerol is oxidized into dihydroxyacetone by glycerol dehydrogenase. Next, dihydroxyacetone is phosphorylated into phosphodihydroxyacetone in the presence of dihydroxyacetone kinase. Thanks to triozophosphate isomerase phosphodihydroxoacetone is transformed into 3- phosphoglycerol aldehyde and further participate in EMP pathway.

There are known also other anaerobic pathways transforming glucose into pyruvate as e. g. Entner-Daudoroff or phosphate pentose pathway (Schlegel, 2003, Dabrock, 1992, Vardar — Schara, 2008, Chin, 2003).

Entner-Doudoroff pathway goes from glucose to pyruvate and is known also as 2-keto-3-detoxy-6-phosphogluconate. Here, glucose-6-phosphate is transformed with phosphogluconate dehydrogense into 6-phosphogluconate. In the next step, the removal of water from 6-phosphogluconate leads to formation of 2-keto-3-deoxy-6-phosphogluconate. This process is followed by formation of pyruvate and 3-phosphoglycol phosphate. These transformations are analogous to glycolitic pathway already described. One molecule of glucose is transformed into molecules of pyruvate with simultaneous formation of one NADPH (reduced dinucleotide nicotinoamine adenine phosphate and one molecule of ATP (Schlegel, 2003).

Pentophosphate pathway is based on initial phosphorylation of glucose to glucose-6- phosphate with help of hexokinase. Further steps are more complicated. The glucose-6- phosphate dehydrogenaze transfer hydrogen to NAD simultaneously forming of gluconolactone. The phosphate gluconolactone dehydrogenase helps to generate 6- phosphogluconate acid. The last phase is based on decarboxylation of the acid into ribuloso-6- phosphate. The transfer of this compound into riboso-5-phosphate and xylulose-5-phosphate starts a non-oxidative phase. At this stage of reaction the reversible reaction between these compounds occurs with formation of sedoheptulose-7-phosphate and 3-phosphoglycerate aldehyde. Subsequent reactions can generate fructose-6-phosphate an erythrose-4-phosphate. In further reactions erythrose-4-phosphate is transformed into 3-phosphoglycerate aldehyde and fructose-6-phosphate. Thus, one cycle of pentophosphate pathway generates 2 molecules of fructose-6-phosphate, one molecule of 3-phosphateglycerol aldehyde, 3 molecules of CO2 and 6 molecules of NADPH. The pentophosphate pathway with glycolysis leads finally to the pyruvate formation (Schlegel, 2003).

In the next steps in anaerobic conditions, the oxidative decarboxylation of pyruvate occurs with acetylo-CoA and CO2 formation. This reaction is catalyzed by pyruvate oxyreductase and the reduced form of ferredoxin appears as a step in final oxidation catalyzed by hydrogenase. Here, electrons reduce protons to molecular hydrogen. The reduced ferredoxin is also formed in glycolysis as the result of NADH oxidation to NAD (Dabrock, 1992). Carbon dioxide, acetic acid, lactic acid ethanol, butanol and acetone accompany hydrogen formation:

C6H12O6 + 2H2O ^ 2CH3COOH + 2CO2 + 4H2 (4)

C6H12O6 + 2H2O ^ CH3COCH3 + 3CO2 + 4H2 (5)

C6H12O6 ^ CH3CH2CH2CH2COOH + 2CO2 + 2H2 (6)

C6H12O6 ^ CH3CH2CH2 CH2OH + 2CO2 + H2O (7)

C6H12O6 ^ 2CH3CH2OH + 2CO2 (8)

C6H12O6^2CH3CHOHCOOH (9)

These reactions indicate that theoretical yield of hydrogen should 4 moles of hydrogen per one of glucose when acetone or acetic acid are among the products (Vardar-Schara, 2008).

image101

Fig. 9. Scheme of fermentative hydrogen production in E. coli (Maeda, 2008).

Cells metabolize glucose into phosphoenolpyruvate, pyruvate, and formate. Phosphoenolpyruvate is converted to succinate by fumarate reductase (FrdC), and pyruvate is converted to either lactate by lactate dehydrogenase (LdhA), to carbon dioxide (CO2) and acetate by pyruvate oxidase (PoxB), to carbon dioxide by pyruvate dehydrogenase (AceE), or to formate by pyruvate formate lyase (PFL). Hydrogen is produced from formate by the formate hydrogen lyase (FHL) system consisting of hydrogenase 3 (Hyd 3) and formate dehydrogenase-H (FDHH); the FHL is activated by FhlA that is regulated by Fnr and repressed by HycA. Evolved hydrogen is consumed through the hydrogen uptake activity of hydrogenase 1 (Hyd 1) and hydrogenase 2 (Hyd 2). Formate is exported by FocA and/or FocB and is metabolized by formate dehydrogenase-N (FDHN; FdnG), which is linked with nitrate reductase A (NarG) and formate dehydrogenase-O (FDHO; FdoG). HypABCDEF are maturation proteins for hydrogenases 1, 2, and 3 (Maeda, 2008)

Transformation of pyruvate to acetylo-CoA and formic acid occurs in the presence of puruvate-formate liase with relatively anaerobic microorganisms. Formic acid is then transformed into hydrogen and CO2 in the presence of formic-hydrogen lyase. Here, 2 molecules of hydrogen from one molecule of glucose can be generated. Similarly as in the case of completely anaerobic bacteria, pyruvate can form lactic acid (reaction 9), whereas acetylo-CoA into ethanol and acetic acid (reactions 8 and 4). These processes can lower the theoretical amounts of generated hydrogen. Additional negative effect comes from the formation of succinic acid. Namely, formate-hydrogen lyase. become active only at low values of pH what in consequence is caused by formation of acids. Thanks to the decomposition of formic acid further fermentation towards other acids can proceed (Dabrock, 1992, Hallenbeck, 2009).

The absence of photosystem II in purple non-sulphur bacteria eliminates the problem of oxygen inhibition in hydrogen generation. However, in order to decompose water molecule and generate an electron in the photobiological process, the PNS bacteria need simple organic and inorganic compounds for photosynthesis. Organic compounds are a source of carbon and electrons. The PNS bacteria can use also CO2 as a source of carbon after transformation of metabolism into photoautotrophic one. However, if the light intensity is too low to reduce CO2 then the cell can use H2 and even H2S (at low concentrations) as a source of electrons (Kars, 2010). However, CO2 absorption is the basic metabolic process in the cell developing either in autotrophic or heterotrophic systems. The removal of RuBisCO enzyme via genetic modification of PNS bacteria results in the decline of photoheterotrophic development (Akkerman, 2002). Hydrogen generation with PNS bacteria can be realized in the presence of such simple organic molecules as acetate, lactate, malate or glucose. The maximum theoretical yields of conversion of these compounds to photogenerated hydrogen are described by the following equations:

(acetic acid)

C2H4O2 + 2H2O ^ 2CO2 + 4H2

(10)

(lactic acid )

C3H6O3 + 3H2O ^ 3CO2 + 6H2

(11)

(malic acid)

C4H6O5 + 3H2O ^ 4CO2 + 6H2

(12)

(glucose)

C6H12O6 + 6H2O ^ 6CO2 + 12H2

(13)

The theoretical amounts are usually much higher than those observed in experiments. The conversion of lactate and malate occurs easily with relatively high yields, but that of acetate and glucose is much more difficult and gives low yields of hydrogen (Kars, 2010). The discrepancies between theoretical values in hydrogen productivity and those obtained in experiments can be explained by different metabolic pathways of carbon in PNS bacteria (Figure 10, Koku, 2002).

image102The amount of electrons generated on absorption of organic compounds depends on the source of organic carbon. Even a slight difference in the molecular structure can lead towards completely different metabolic pathway. For example, D — and L-isomers of malate (after conversion into pyruvate) can easily join the TCA cycle. In this way the energy demand for hydrogen generation is met, whereas such a substrate as acetate is used in the other metabolic pathways: e. g. glyoxylate cycle, citramalate cycle, and ethylmalonyl-CoA pathway (Kars, 2010). The excess of electrons generated during assimilation of such substrates as glycerol or butyrate must be accepted during CO2 photoreduction. Therefore, when the only source of carbon is glycerol, it is not assimilated in significant amounts, which is changed after supplementation of glycerol with malate. Initially, malate is assimilated from the medium and evolution of CO2 occurs. In the second step of reaction, the evolved CO2 permits the use of glycerol as a substrate (Pike, 1975).

image103 image104

Fructose

Although the large variety of substrates can be used by photosynthetic bacteria, only a few fulfill the requirements for fast reaction rate and high yield of photogenerated H2. In general, the preferred substrates as anions of organic acids, whereas carbohydrates do not meet the above criteria (Koku, 2002).

Digestate: A New Nutrient Source — Review

Marianna Makadi, Attila Tomocsik and Viktoria Orosz

Research Institute of Nyiregyhaza, RISF, CAAES, University of Debrecen,

Hungary

1. Introduction

Digestate is the by-product of methane and heat production in a biogas plant, coming from organic wastes. Depending on the biogas technology, the digestate could be a solid or a liquid material.

Digestate contains a high proportion of mineral nitrogen (N) especially in the form of ammonium which is available for plants. Moreover, it contains other macro — and microelements necessary for plant growth. Therefore the digestate can be a useful source of plant nutrients, it seems to be an effective fertilizer for crop plants. On the other hand, the organic fractions of digestate can contribute to soil organic matter (SOM) turnover, influencing the biological, chemical and physical soil characteristics as a soil amendment.

Besides these favourable effects of digestate, there are new researches to use it as solid fuel or in the process of methane production.

Effect of chitosan on bacterial diversity in UASB treating POME

In their experiments, Khemkhao et al. (2011) found that DGGE patterns of bacterial diversity of the three bacterial groups, hydrolytic, acidogenic and acetogenic, persisted at all operating temperatures. However, the distribution of their members among bacteria in each group did show small changes under the different operating conditions. By the end of the operating period, the UASB with chitosan addition was found to contain a lower proportion of hydrolytic bacteria and a higher proportion of acidogenic bacteria than the control. However, the diversity of acetogenic bacteria was found to be similar in the two reactors. Sulfate-reducing bacteria were detected in the control but not in the chitosan reactor.

It is known (Bitton, 1994) that hydrolytic, acidogenic and acetogenic bacteria work together to degrade complex organic matters into acetate, CO2 and H2. Hydrolytic bacteria begin the process of degradation by breaking down complex organic molecules such as proteins, cellulose, lignin and lipids into soluble monomer molecules by extracellular enzymes, i. e., proteases, cellulases and lipases. The monomer molecules produced are amino acids, glucose, fatty acids and glycerol. These monomers are then degraded by the acidogenic (acid-forming) group of bacteria which convert them into organic acids, alcohols and ketones, acetate, CO2, and H2. The organic acids produced include acetic, propionic, formic, lactic, butyric, and succinic acids. The alcohols and ketones produced are ethanol, methanol, glycerol and acetone. In the final stage, the acetogenic bacteria (acetate and H2-producing bacteria) convert the fatty acids, alcohols and ketones into acetate, CO2 and H2.

Conditioning: Target L gas

Two different L gas target properties have been described. Because of their basic constitutions, one bio-methane mixture is conditioned with air and the other is conditioned with a combination of air and LPG.

Table 14 shows a summary of the admixtures with which a target calorific value-oriented mixture for the low calorific base gas property can be achieved.

In the case of simple air addition, particular attention should be paid to compliance with the maximum O2 volume fraction. This should not exceed 3 % vol. in dry networks according to DVGW worksheet G 260. This quantity is reached when adding pure air to the processed biogas, at an admixture of 15 vol -% of air. In the low caloric L gases (e. g. Weser Ems gas), this limit is never reached.

Furthermore, a minimum air addition may also be necessary, in order to achieve the required Wobbe Index according to DVGW worksheet G 260.

Table 15 shows the minimum air addition for the individual processing grades of methane to achieve an L gas compliant Wobbe Index of under 13.0 kWh/m3 (NTP).

Air admixtures to attain the target calorific value + / — 2%

Weser Ems L Gas

Methane concentration after

processing

in vol -%

Hs, n = 9,653 — 10,047 kWh/m3

Air admixture

in Vol.-%

94,0

3,6 — 7,7

96,0

5,8 — 10,0

98,0

8,0 — 12,3

99,5

9,7 — 14,0

Table 14. Air additions to the H gas properties under investigation

Methane

in

Biogas

Methane

in

admixture

CO2

in

admixture

Air to the Biogas

O2

in

admixture

Calorific

value

Wobbe

Index

rel.

Density

in Vol.-%

in Vol.-%

in Vol.-%

in Vol.-%

in Vol.-%

in kWh/m3

in kWh/m3

94,000

92,429

5,506

1,700

0,645

10,226

12,999

0,619

96,000

91,778

3,442

4,600

1,208

10,154

12,996

0,611

98,000

91,163

1,488

7,500

1,741

10,086

12,993

0,603

99,500

90,702

0,091

9,700

2,126

10,035

12,988

0,597

Table 15. Minimum quantity of air to attain L gas specification

For the high-caloric L gas mixtures (target properties according to Holland II L gas) the processed biogas is conditioned with air and LPG. Table 16 shows the correlating LPG-air additions, to reach the calorific value range (+ / -2%).

The gray-shaded areas show where a compliant combination of air and LPG additions is impossible. With increasing LPG additions, the necessary addition of air is limited by the maximum O2 volume fraction of 3 %. If too little LPG is added, only the lower calorific value range can be covered. The broadest coverage of the calorific value range lies in between and is marked by the wider bandwidth of air additions.

in the Vol -%

0

2.

4

6

8

Holland II

Hs, n =

9,996 — 10,404 kWh/m3

94

2

4

4

7

7

10

10

14

14

16

96

5

5

7

9

9

12

12

16

16

16

98

10

11

11

15

14

16

99,5

12

13

13

15

16

16

Methane concentration

LPG — addition [Vol -%]

Table 16. Air addition, depending on the addition of LPG and methane concentration