Wave/Oscillatory Flow Reactors

Oscillatory flow bioreactors contain equally spaced orifice plate baffles in a tubular style reactor. This reactor has improved heat and mass transfer due to the oscillatory motion that is imposed on the net flow of the fluid, which means that the degree of mixing is independent of the net flow. This results in long residence times in rela­tively low length-to-diameter ratios. This reactor design, therefore, has the potential to decrease the energy required for mixing algae cultures, due to decreased pumping requirements, and also leads to decreased capital costs (Harvey et al., 2003).

TABLE 5.3

Examples of Productivities Achieved in Closed Bioreactors with Various Microalgal Species

Highest Productivity

Reactor Type

Species

g m-2d-1

g l-‘d-‘

Ref.

Vertical column

Phaeodactylum

0.69

Sanchez Miron et al., 1999

Isochrysis galbana

1.60

Qiang and Richmond, 1994

Tetraselmis

38.2

0.42

Chini Zittelli et al., 2006

Haematococcus

0.06

Lopez et al., 2006

pluvialis

Airlift tubular

Haematococcus

0.41

Lopez et al., 2006

pluvialis

Porphyridium

1.5

Rubio et al., 1999

cruentum

Porphyridium

20

1.2

Acien Fernandez et al., 2001

cruentum

Phaeodactylum

32

1.9

Molina Grima et al., 2001

Horizontal tubular

Spirulina maxima

25

0.25

Torzillo et al., 1986

Spirulina sp.

27.8

Torzillo et al., 1986

Spirulina platensis

27

1.60

Richmond et al., 1993

Isochrysis galbana

0.32

Molina Grima et al., 1994

Phaeodactylum

2.02

Fernandez et al., 1998

Phaeodactylum

2.76

Grima et al., 1996

Haematococcus

13

0.05

Olaizola, 2000

pluvialis

Inclined tubular

Chlorella sp.

72.5

2.90

Lee et al., 1995

Chlorella sp.

130

3.64

Lee and Low, 1991

Chlorella

1.47

Ugwu et al., 2002

sorokiniana

Helical tubular

Phaeodactylum

1.4

Hall et al., 2003

tricornutum Tetraselmis chuii

1.20

Borowitzka, 1997

Flat plate

Spirulina platensis

33

0.30

Hu et al., 1996

Spirulina platensis

51

4.30

Hu et al., 1996

Spirulina platensis

24

0.80

Tredici et al., 1991

Nannochloropsis

0.27

Cheng-Wu et al., 2001

Nannochloropsis

0.85

Richmond and Cheng-Wu, 2001

Haematococcus

10.2

Huntley and Redalje, 2006

pluvialis Chlorella sp.

22.8, 19.4

3.8, 3.2

Doucha et al., 2005

5.3.3.2 Hybrid Production Systems

As open and closed systems offer different advantages and disadvantages, it seems practical that a combination of the two could provide the best of both worlds. This idea has been investigated in various configurations, either by circulating culture between open and closed reactors through a single growth stage, or by having a two-stage culture regime where cells are moved from one to the other at a certain point. A simple single-stage intermediate design is produced by enclosing or semi­enclosing open ponds in tunnels or greenhouses to improve temperature control and reduce evaporation and contamination. This is very effective in improving produc­tivity, particularly in colder seasons, but comes at increased capital cost (Vonshak, 1997). Pushparaj et al. (1997) described a system where an alveolar panel oriented toward the sun was coupled with an open raceway for gas transfer. Adding the panels improved the productivity of the pond from 0.18 to 0.31 g L-1d-1.

In two-stage configurations, culture is usually grown initially in closed PBRs to optimize the growth rate and minimize contamination of the inoculum, which is then moved to an open pond for the second growth stage. Integration of open and closed PBRs in this way could provide sufficiently large, clean inoculants to limited — duration culture in outdoor raceways in order to significantly limit adverse events (Greenwell et al., 2010).

The second cultivation stage often involves nutrient stress for accumulation of a metabolite such as lipids or pigments. The nutrient stress stage is suited to open ponds because the growth rate is naturally low and therefore not affected by the low light availability (Brennan and Owende, 2010). Initial culture in closed reactors also implies that the culture entering the pond is relatively dense and therefore less likely to be contaminated, particularly in a nutrient-deprived environment (Singh et al., 2011). This sort of system has been used for the production of astaxanthin from Haematococcus (Huntley and Redalje, 2006) and described for the production of biodiesel from Nannochloropsis (Rodolfi et al., 2009).