A LCA for the paprika cultivation

In the LCA concept of this paper, the direct factors and the indirect ones have to be considered. In our definition, fossil fuel energy inputs (primary energy basis) and the electricity of fossil fuel origin are included in the direct factors. Also, chemical fertilizers are included in the indirect ones. Here, note that another greenhouse gases such as N2O and CH4 are not taken into consideration.

So far, in the biomass LCA analyses, the pre-processing process of chipping, transportation and drying of biomass materials, and the energy conversion process of a production energy of electricity and/or heat, through an energy system are included. This time, the paprika harvesting process has to be added to the entire life cycle stage. Using the chemical experimental data, the design of BT plant with SOFC units would be extremely significant in the biomass LCA. A target is to estimate a life cycle inventory of the entire system with BT gasifier and SOFC.

Подпись: Uncertainties on the transportation distance and the moisture content of raw material (Biomass material). Подпись: Exhausted Gas Supply (C02) Подпись: Fertilizer

Here, we describe on the system boundary in this study. Following ISO 14041 guidelines, we define the system boundary in the biomass energy system (see Fig. 10) (Dowaki et al., 2010b).

Подпись: Product(Paprika)

Подпись: Biomass Resources (Japanese Cedar) Подпись: 'ran spoliation) (1 Ct truck) j Подпись: ВТ Gasifier SOFC (15 t/d+2Q0kW*4 units) image352 image353 image354

Paprika greenhouse
(4.6 ha)

Подпись: Pre-processingEnergy conversion

Fig. 10. System boundary of a paprika production system.

The system boundary includes the entire life cycle of each energy input (electricity/thermal energy), including the pre-processing process, the energy conversion process and the paprika harvesting process. In the pre-processing process, there are sub-processes of chipping, transportation by trucks, and drying. In the energy conversion process, there are sub-processes of the gasification through the BT plant (19 t/d) with the four units of SOFC (200 kW / unit) process. In the paprika harvesting process, it is assumed that the exhausted gas of CO2 is available as a growth agent. Here, the target product is a paprika. Thus, the functional unit is assumed to be the unit per a produced paprika (Dowaki et al., 2011c).

Next, in the pre-processing process, there are sub-processes of chipping, transportation, and drying of biomass materials. In particular, within the sub-processes of transportation and drying, we have to consider uncertainties (see section 3.3.1). To date, there are a few studies considering these uncertainties. CO2 emissions in the biomass LCA would be affected by the moisture content of biomass materials, and the transportation distance from the cultivation site, or the site of accumulating waste materials, to the energy plant. Hence, it would be extremely significant to consider these factors. Table 7 shows the specific CO2 emissions, for each fuel with biomass materials, respectively.

Item

CO2

Note

Feedstock

Diesel Bunker A Kerosene Electricity

0.0 g-CO2/MJ-Fuel

74.4 g-CO2 /MJ-Fuel 76.9 g-CO2 /MJ-Fuel 73.6 g-CO2 /MJ-Fuel 123.1 g-CO2/MJ-Fuel*

at 20 wt.% (moisture content), Japanese Cedar, HV:13.23 MJ/kg Chipping, Transportation, HV: 35.50 MJ/L Paprika production (Boiler) Paprika production (Boiler) Paprika production (Ventilation and lightning)

Fertilizer (N) Fertilizer (P2O5) Fertilizer (K2O)

5.67 kg-CO2/kg 0.88 kg-CO2/kg 1.85 kg-CO2/kg

Indirect CO2 emission Indirect CO2 emission Indirect CO2 emission

Table 7. Data of the specific CO2 emissions.

On the energy conversion process, assuming that the 19 t/d BT plant and 4×200 kW SOFC (BT-SOFC system) were installed, we estimated the CO2 emission in the paprika production system. Here, the operational condition of SOFC unit is assumed to be almost full load operation. Also, the specification of SOFC unit is shown in Table 8.

Unit Scale

[kW]

200

Number of unit

4

Operating Temp.

[°C]

900

Current density

[mA/cm2]

612

Stoichiometric ratio

1.25

Tafel slope

[mV/dec.]

2.2

Cell Resistance

[ohm]

0.52

Open Circuit Voltage

[mV]

950

DC/AC converter Eff.

[%]

95

Table 8. Specification of SOFC unit.

Due to the specification data in each system, the performance of BT-SOFC system is obtained as Table 9. Also, the thermal energy supply to the facility is assumed to be due to the heat pump (COP: 5.5).

Feedstock

781.3

10,338

kg/h

MJ/h

BT Process (19t/d)

Cold-Gas eff. (Eq.

(7))

56.2

LHV%

Auxiliary Power

127.3

kW

Power eff. vs.

syngas

45.5

LHV%

SOFC (4×200 kW)

Power eff. vs. feed

25.0

LHV%

Net eff. vs. feed

20.6

LHV%

Net power scale

590

kW

Table 9. Performance of BT-SOFC system.