Как выбрать гостиницу для кошек
14 декабря, 2021
The house has been simulated with the DEROB LTH (Dynamic Energy Response Of Buildings) version 00.04, developed by the Swedish Department of Building Science belonging to the Lund Institute of Technology. Natural ventilation has been considered
2609 kWh/y for heating (29 kWh/m2y) Fig. 8 — Model developed by DEROB LTH simulation programme |
during the whole year.
The results indicate that the volume A will re and 2812 kWh/y for cooling (30 kWh/m2y). This is a lower demand compared to the heating demand of a typical Italian residential building.
4.2 The heating systems (solar and biomass)
Since the energy consumption for heating is low, a great part of it could be covered by a solar heating system. Therefore two solar heating systems have been designed: a water solar system with solar collectors to cover a great part of the heating demand and the DHW needs (Costruzioni Solari s. r.l.[16]) and an air solar system (Solarwall[17]) to preheat the inlet air during the winter sunny days. The
Fig. 9 — Conventional solar system winter behaviour |
solar system will heat the house through a radiant pavement system at low temperature. The whole solar system is integrated with a wood stove to cover the complete heating demand during the coldest period.
The water solar system
Fig. 10- Solar water system for space and domestic water heating scheme |
Six solar thermal collectors of 1,9 sq meters each and one boiler of 700 litres for the space heating system are located in the south wall as reported in figure 9. The solar system scheme is reported in figure 10. This system should cover from 64% to 100% of the heating demand. In order to increase this percentage, a solar air system has been designed.
Days/ month |
Month |
Days /month |
Average daily radiation in the sloped surface |
Average system efficiency |
(Qa) Daily average thermal energy available/ sq m |
(Qa) Monthly thermal energy available/ sq m |
Monthly thermal energy available |
(Ea) monthly energy demand |
Surplus/integ ration |
% solar fraction |
kWh/m2 day |
kWh / m2 day |
kWh / m2 month |
kWh/ month |
kWh/ month |
kWh/ month |
% |
||||
31 |
January |
31 |
3,14 |
0,40 |
1,26 |
39 |
443 |
600 |
— 157 |
74% |
28 |
February |
28 |
3,42 |
0,40 |
1,37 |
38 |
437 |
542 |
— 105 |
81% |
31 |
March |
31 |
3,81 |
0,45 |
1,72 |
53 |
606 |
600 |
6 |
101% |
30 |
April |
0 |
0 |
0,50 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
31 |
May |
0 |
0 |
0,50 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
30 |
June |
0 |
0 |
0,50 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
31 |
July |
0 |
0 |
0,50 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
31 |
August |
0 |
0 |
0,50 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
30 |
September |
0 |
0 |
0,50 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
31 |
October |
0 |
0 |
0,50 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
30 |
November |
30 |
3,04 |
0,45 |
1,37 |
41 |
467 |
581 |
— 113 |
80% |
31 |
December |
31 |
2,73 |
0,40 |
1,09 |
34 |
385 |
600 |
— 215 |
64% |
365 |
TOTAL |
151 |
3,23 |
0,47 |
1,36 |
205 |
2.338 |
2.923 |
80% |
Table 2 — Heat production and the coverage (in %) of the solar system. |