Calculation of the ecological footprint

Taking into account that in Athens the Public Power Corporation refers a mean yield of 30% per kWh between production and final consumption and that the production of each kWh causes CO2 emissions equal to 0.9 kg, (European Commission, 2001), the CO2 emissions, (in tn), caused by the total Athens’ heat island energy cost have been calculated. Finally, the ecological footprint of the Athens’ heat island, (in ha), is calculated by dividing the estimated CO2 emissions by the average world CO2 sequestration rate by the forests which is 5128.205 kg CO2/ha.

By considering that all buildings are air conditioned, we calculated, Table 5, the maximum potential ‘Athens heat island energy cost’ in kWh/m2, the maximum potential ‘total Athens heat island energy cost’ in GWh, the maximum potential CO2 emissions due to the total Athens heat island energy cost, in tn, and finally the maximum potential ecological footprint of the Athens heat island in ha.

As it can be observed, there is a remarkable potential energy cost of the urban heat island phenomenon in Athens ranging between 1300-1500 GWh/y, a very high potential increase of the CO2 emissions ranging from 4 to 4.6 Mtn. The calculated maximum potential ecological footprint because of the heat island effect varies between 780000 to 900000 ha.

Table 6 shows the actual Athens’ heat island energy cost, the actual total Athens’ heat island energy cost, the actual CO2 emissions due to the total Athens’ heat island energy cost in tn, and finally the actual ecological footprint of the Athens’ heat island.

References

Barett, J., and Scott, A.: 2001 ‘An ecological footprint of Liverpool: Developing sustainable scenarios’, Report for the Environmental Agency.

Geros, V., and Santamouris, M.: 1995, Summer-Building, Energy simulation tool,

University of Athens, Athens.

Hassid, S., Santamouris, M., Papanikolaou, N., Linardi, A., Klitsikas, N.,

Georgakis, C., and Asimakopoulos, D. N.: 2000, ‘The effect of the Athens heat island on air conditioning load’, Energy and Buildings 32, 131-141.

Hellenic Statistical Service : 1991, ‘Construction in Greece’.

Klitsikas, N. and Santamouris, M.: 1997, Final Report of the program ‘Sustainable Western Athens’, Association of the Municipalities of Western Athens.

Livada, I., Sant. amouris, M., Niachou, K., Papanikolaou, N., and Mihalakakou, G.:2002, ‘Determination of places in the great Athens area where the heat island effect is observed’, Theor. Appl. Climatol. 71, 219-230.

Mihalakakou, G., Flocas, H. A., Santamouris, M., and Helmis, C.: 2002,

‘Application of neural networks to the simulation of the heat island over Athens, Greece, using synoptic types as a predictor’, J. Appl. Meteorol. 41,

519-527.

Mi. halakakou, G., Santamouris, M., Papanikolaou, N., Cartalis, C., and

Tsangrassoulis, A. :2003, ‘Simulation of the urban heat island phenomenon in Mediterranean climates’, Pure and Applied Geophysics, In Press.

Psiloglou, V.: 1997, ‘Development of an atmospheric solar radiation model’, Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Athens, Physics Department, Athens, Greece.

09

Rees, W.: 1992, ‘Ecological footprints and appropriate carrying capacity: What urban economics leaves out’, Environment and Urbanisation 4, Part 2.

Santamouris, M., Mihalakakou, G., Papanikolaou, N., and Asimakopoulos, D. N.: 1999, ‘A neural network approach for modeling the heat island phenomenon in urban areas during the summer period’, Geophys. Res. Letters 26, 337-340.

Santamouris, M., Papanikolaou, N., Livada, I., Koronakis, I., Georgakis, C., Argiriou, A., and Asimakopoulos, D. N.: 2001, ‘On the impact of urban climate on the energy consumption of buildings’, Solar Energy 70, 201-216.

Simmons, C., and Chambers, N.: 1998, ‘Footprint UK Households : how big is your ecological garden?’ Local Environment 3, 355-362.

Wackernagel, M., and Rees, W.: 1996: ‘Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the Earth’, Gabriola Island, BC and Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers.

Wackernagel, M.: 2000, ‘Big things first: focusing on the scale imperative with the Ecological Footprint’ Ecological Economics 32, 391-394.

Mean Temperature, Mean Maximum Temperature and Cooling Degree Hours for the year 1997 and for the five experimental stations

Table 1

Station

Number

Mean

Temperature for the cooling season, (June, July, and August) in 0C

Mean Maximum Temperature for the cooling season, (June, July, and August) in 0C

Cooling Degree Hours (Base 26°C)

Reference

25.8

28.3

3615

7

32.6

38.5

9280

9

29.2

34.6

8200

12

31.9

39.2

9750

13

28.6

31.9

7700

Mean Temperature, Mean Maximum Temperature and Cooling Degree Hours for the year 1998 and for the five experimental stations

Table 2

Station

Number

Mean

Temperature for the cooling season, (June, July, and August) in °C

Mean Maximum Temperature for the cooling season, (June, July, and August) in °C

Cooling Degree Hours (Base 26°C)

Reference

27.4

30.1

4508

7

33.2

39.4

10004

9

30.8

36.0

8945

12

32.5

40.4

9912

13

29.3

34.2

8600

Table 3

Description of the reference building

Floor Area

200 m2

Floors’ Materials

Concrete, Marble

Roof’s Materials

Concrete, Insulation, Clay Coverage

The 90% of the External Walls

Double Brick with an Air Gap between the two brick layers, External Insulation

The 10% of the External Walls

Concrete, External Insulation

Windows

One-pane single glazing with shading coefficient equal to 0.1

Occupancy

3 persons in each floor

Artificial Lighting

5W/m2 for each floor

Electrical Equipment

5W/m2 for each floor

Infiltration

0.5 ACH

Natural Ventilation

0.5 ACH

Set Point Temperature for the air­conditioning system

26°C

Ground Temperature

17°C

Table 4

The mean cooling load in kWh/m2 for all stations and for the years 1997 and 1998.

Station Number

Mean Electrical Cooling load for 1997

(kWh/m2)

Mean Electrical Cooling load for Cooling load for 1998

(kWh/m2)

Reference Station

22.7

38.0

Urban Station No 7

70.4

77.9

Urban Station No 9

53.2

61.6

Urban Station No 13

55.9

71.4

Urban Station No 14

44.0

57.1

Mean Urban

55.9

67.0

Table 5

The maximum potential Athens’ heat island energy cost, the maximum potential total Athens’ heat island energy cost, the maximum potential CO2 emissions due to the total Athens’ heat island energy cost in tn, and finally the maximum potential ecological footprint of the Athens’ heat island.

Year

1997

1998

Maximum Potential Athens’ heat island energy cost (kWh/m2)

33.2

29.0

Maximum Potential Total Athens’ heat island energy cost (GWh)

1540.5

1345.6

Maximum Potential CO2 emissions (Mtn)

4,621

4,036

Maximum Potential Ecological footprint of the Athens’ heat island (ha)

901180

787176

Table 6

The actual Athens’ heat island energy cost, the actual total Athens’ heat island energy cost, the actual CO2 emissions due to the total Athens’ heat island energy cost in tn, and finally the actual ecological footprint of the Athens’ heat island.

Year

1997

1998

Actual Total Athens’ heat island energy cost (GWh)

120.7

105.5

Actual Potential CO2 emissions (Mtn)

0,362

0,316

Actual Ecological footprint of the Athens’ heat island (ha)

70562

61714