Как выбрать гостиницу для кошек
14 декабря, 2021
Auto industry
Published on November 12th, 2014
by Christopher DeMorro
7
Few businesses have managed to become as culturally relevant as Apple has in the past decade, and having pioneered and conquered the smartphone space, the tech giant is looking for new places to invest. One repeated suggestion among stock and technology analysts is that Apple should buy Tesla Motors, and such a move might end Tesla Motors as we know it.
This suggestion was made yet again by Business Insider writer Jay Yarow, who demonstrates his ignorance of auto manufacturing within the first few paragraphs of his piece. The crux of his arguement is is that because Apple can manufacture millions of iPhones are a (relatively) low price, then they could do the same thing for Tesla Motors, which is experiencing something of a production bottleneck.
Forget for a moment that Apple outsources most of the manufacturing of its products to China’s Foxconn, which has had to put suicide safety nets up so its workers won’t kill themselves. Building a phone and building a car are two *very* different things, and there are more regulations related to taillight placement and dimensions than Yarow can even imagine. Apple also works a tremendous amount of profit margin into each of its iPhones, with an estimated 49% to 58% gross margin on each phone it sells. That’s more than twice the profit margin Tesla makes on its top-end Model S sedans; if Apple had set the pricing of the Model S, it would have started at $100,000 instead of $70,000. Imagine what that would do for sales.
How does Apple do it? Primarily buying underpaying its workforce, as the people building iPhones make less than $300 a month. Apple has also been accused of profiting from child labor, something I can’t ever recall associating with any part of the auto industry. Meanwhile, Tesla has the highest revenue-per-employee in the industry, pays some of the highest wages and best benefits, and doesn’t pertain to the cult of secrecy and scare tactics that has evolved at Apple.
To be sure, a Tesla-Apple technology alliance could be of great benefit to both companies, though I would argue with Yarows assertion that Tesla’s software needs that much work (nothing is perfect, and Apple has had plenty of iOs problems of its own). Apple CarPlay is positioning itself as the infotainment solution for certain luxury automakers, though Google and Microsoft are making a go at it as well. There’s little doubt that Apple wants to get into the automotive technology world, and buying Tesla would be an easy way to take a big step into an all-new market. But a company like Apple may not be able to leave well-enough alone, and that could undermine the powerful but delicate momentum electric cars (and especially Tesla) are building.
Tesla is more than a money-making machine; Musk has stated the ultimate goal is to advance the adoption of electric vehicles by all automakers. To succeed in the way Elon Musk envisions, as a company that shares its patents with the world and encourages the competition to build even better electric vehicles, Tesla must remain independent of a profit-driven monolith like Apple. The iPhone maker could literally buy Tesla five times over at its current $30 billion valuation, but it would expect a hefty return for its investment. Can you imagine Apple delaying the iPhone 6 three times? Me neither, and the desire for profit hasn’t stopped Apple from launching ultimately flawed products in the past, for which they ultimately had to settle out of court.
Meanwhile, Musk has said in his most recent quarterly report that his company will forgo short term gains in favor of long term profitability, even if it means delaying the Model X again. That’s not something a lot of companies, even outside of the automotive world, are willing to do, and Tesla has succeeded because of how different Musk has made it. I have my doubts that Apple would keep that culture of openness and product perfection intact, even though a recent teardown of the Model S revealed more similarity to smartphones than conventional cars. So I’m not sure what, besides its massive cash reserves and marketing expertise, Apple could offer Tesla.
Then again, Apple is still a hip, cool company, and people see their products as a status symbol as well as a communication device. Perhaps some of their marketing knowledge could even speed up the sale and adoption of electric vehicles, making plug-in cars as popular and commonplace as the iPhone in relatively short order. The two companies have already met, though just what came out of that conversation remains a mystery, and Tesla has managed to snag a couple of former Apple higher-ups for its ranks as well. If Apple can do for electric cars what it did for smartphones, the world as we know it will be a much better place.
That’s a mighty big “IF” though. What do you think? Would Apple buying Tesla help accelerate electric vehicle adoption, or would the electric automaker become bogged down by a profit-driven mega corporation until its just another car company?
MAKE SOLAR WORK FOR YOU!
Christopher DeMorro A writer and gearhead who loves all things automotive, from hybrids to HEMIs, Chris can be found wrenching or writing- or esle, he’s running, because he’s one of those crazy people who gets enjoyment from running insane distances.
if Apple built an Icar. (1) you couldn’t steer it yourself. (2) You could only go places that apple has approved. (3) You wouldn’t be able to turn right for at least 3 years, when they got around to adding that ‘feature’ to a future model. (4) You would have to replace it at least every two years. (5) You could only get support if you bought an applecare contract. J/K
Tesla uses Linux as it’s underlying OS. That writer is trying to say that Apple’s OS is better than Tesla’s OS. If that writer wants Apple to get into Real Time OS development market then he is trying to expand Apple from a consumer focused company to an industry focused company. Industry is simply not interested in paying for Apple’s massive profit margins and the serious technical experts who make hardware/firmware recommendations will never recommend Apple OS.
If on the other hand all he wants is the Apple UX so that his car and phone provide the same interface then he might be onto a niche market for Apple obsessives. These people will pay ridiculous amounts of money for anything with an Apple logo.
Mac OS X is a certified UNIX. Linux is a flavor of UNIX as well. They’re not so far apart.
People won’t pay ridiculous amounts of money for anything with an Apple logo. There have been two desktop computers — the 20th Anniversary Mac and the G4 Cube — that sold poorly because they were priced too high.
Apple and other manufacturers are using Blackberry’s QNX system for their CarPlay system. They don’t need to use Mac OS X or even iOS in the car. They already have a system for real-time automotive controls.
What would Apple bring to Tesla? At most switch the GUI of the touch screen! In an iPhone, 90% of the customer experience is the Apple software, that is what people are paying for. In the Tesla, the UI software accounts for at most 5% of the experience. People want a car to go from A to B with excellent performance, they don’t buy a Tesla to surf the web.
Apple buying Tesla doesn’t make much sense at all, they are completely different businesses. In addition Tesla is a very high risk investment which perhaps isn’t a huge deal for Apple. Tesla is very highly valued while at the same time not really doing anything miraculous. It wouldn’t take very long at all for other car manufacturers to catch up to Tesla if they really wanted, but they have correctly determined that the mass market isn’t really there yet.
I will give up on Tesla if Apple buys it.
Why will you give up? The rabid investors located in the “Big Apple” will always write positively about Apple, Inc.
This in turn, will pump up stock valuations, so Apple can buy other companies, in adjacent industries.
Surely you know that Apple is also considering a tender offer for the Sears Tower in Chicago. Apple will require it be painted Space Grey.
Then, the circle office in Cupertino will become the “Big Hole”, and the Sears Tower will become the “Big Wang”
Tim Cook will work in the circle office because he was missing something when he was born. Thusly, he will sing show tunes and songs from Lady Gaga while prancing around in a circular fashion.
Don’t taunt these ideas as they were already decided around a big table during a closed meeting before Steve Jobs died. Just continue to invest in Apple like a rabid monkey, whose never heard of Enron.
I want to start by saying “SETTLE THE F— DOWN”. Apple isn’t going to buy Tesla. It makes no sense. This buyout rumor has been on the books for a long time.
Apple has acquired companies in the past, only to use them for their margins. One of the most recent acquisitions was Beats. They are NOT changing the Beats headphones and are likely merging their own Apple Radio service with Beats’ own streaming service. They’re not “Apple-izing” Beats.
They’ve done the same with other acquisitions over time too — leaving the underlying company alone and buying them for their IP.
The new CEO, Tim Cook, is very different from Steve Jobs. He is calculating and rather unemotional about his decisions, and is very, very smart. He isn’t going to jump into automotive manufacturing. He isn’t going to even try and force CarPlay onto the Tesla screens. If anything, look for a battery production joint venture, but nothing more.