Как выбрать гостиницу для кошек
14 декабря, 2021
Generally, heating coils are used to heat the raw material in biodiesel production process. This treatment can be also done by microwave method. An alternative heating system "microwave irradiation" has been used in transesterification reactions in recent years. Microwaves are electromagnetic radiations which represent a nonionizing radiation that influences molecular motions such as ion migration or dipole rotations, but not altering the molecular structure (Fini & Breccia, 1999; Varma, 2001; Refaat et al., 2008). The frequencies of microwave range from 300 MHz to 30 GHz, generally frequency of 2.45 GHz is preferred in laboratory applications (Taylor et al., 2005). Microwave irradiation activates the smallest degree of variance of polar molecules and ions with the continuously changing magnetic field (Azcan& Danisman, 2007). The changing electrical field, which interacts with the molecular dipoles and charged ion, causes these molecules or ions to have a rapid rotation and heat is generated due to molecular friction (Azcan& Danisman, 2007; Saifuddin & Chua, 2004). The absorption of microwaves causes a very rapid increase of the temperature of reagents, solvents and products (Fini & Breccia, 1999).
Microwave process can be explained for the biodiesel production with transesterification reaction: the oil, methanol, and base catalyst contain both polar and ionic components. Microwaves activate the smallest degree of variance of polar molecules and ions, leading to molecular friction, and therefore the initiation of chemical reactions is possible (Nuechter et al., 2000). Because the energy interacts with the sample on a molecular level, very efficient and rapid heating can be obtained in microwave heating. Since the energy is interacting with the molecules at a very fast rate, the molecules do not have time to relax and the heat generated can be for short times and much greater than the overall recorded temperature of the bulk reaction mixture. There is instantaneous localized superheating in microwave heating and the bulk temperature may not be an accurate measure of the temperature at which the actual reaction is taking place (Barnard et al., 2007; Refaat et al., 2008).
When the reaction is carried out under microwaves, transesterification is efficiently accelerated in a short reaction time. As a result, a drastic reduction in the quantity of byproducts and a short separation time are obtained (Saifuddin & Chua, 2004; Hernando et al., 2007) and high yields of highly pure products are reached within a short time (Nuechter et al., 2000). So, the cost of production also decreases and less by-products occurs by this method (Oner & Altun, 2009). Therefore, microwave heating compares very favorably over conventional methods, where heating can be relatively slow and inefficient because transferring energy into a sample depends upon convection currents and the thermal conductivity of the reaction mixture (Koopmans et al., 2006; Refaat et al., 2008). Microwave assisted transesterification process schematic diagram was presented in Figure 4.
There can be also a few drawbacks of microwave assisted biodiesel production, beside the great advantages. Microwave synthesis may not be easily scalable from laboratory small-scale synthesis to industrial production. The most significant limitation of the scale up of this technology is the penetration depth of microwave radiation into the absorbing materials, which is only a few centimeters, depending on their dielectric properties. The safety aspect is another drawback of microwave reactors in industry (Yoni & Aharon, 2008; Vyas et al., 2010). This survey of microwave assisted transformations is abstracted from the literature published from 2000 to 2011. And studies on microwave assisted method of transesterification reaction in the literature were summarized in Table 5. The biodiesel production have been studied by using microwave assisted method from different oils such as cottonseed oil (Azcan& Danisman, 2007), safflower seed oil ( Duz et al., 2011), rapeseed oil (Hernando et al., 2007; Geuens et al., 2008), soybean oil (Hernando et al., 2007; Hsiao et al., 2011; Terigar et al., 2010), corn oil (Majewski et al., 2009), macauba oil (Nogueira et al., 2010), waste frying palm oil (Lertsathapornsuk et al., 2008), micro algae oil (Patil et al., 2011), karanja oil (Venkatesh et al., 2011), jatropha oil (Shakinaz et al., 2010), yellow horn oil (Zhang et al., 2010), canola oil (Jin et al., 2011), camelina sativa oil (Patil et al., 2009), castor oil (Yuan et al., 2009), waste vegetable oils (Refaat et al., 2008), maize oil (Ozturk et al., 2010) and sunflower oil (Han et al., 2008; Kong et al., 2009).
Fig. 4. Microwave assisted transesterification process shematic diagram |
Raw material |
Catalyst |
Catalyst amount (wt%) |
Type of alcohol |
Alcohol/ oil molar ratio |
Microwawe conditions |
Reaction time |
Reaction tempe rature |
Performance (%) |
Ref. |
Cotton seed oil |
KOH |
1.5 |
Methanol |
6:1 |
21% of 1200 W |
7 min |
333 K |
92.4 (yield) |
Azcan& Danisman, 2007 |
Safflower seed oil |
NaOH |
1 |
Methanol |
10:1 |
300 W |
6 min |
333 K |
98.4 (conversion) |
Duz et al., 2011 |
Rapeseed oil Soybean oil |
NaOH |
%1.3 |
Methanol |
18:1 1.27 ml |
300 W |
1 min |
60 °C |
97 95 (yield) |
Hernando et al., 2007 |
Corn oil Soybean oil |
Diphenyla mmonium salts: DPAMs (Mesylate) DPABs(Be nzenesulfo nate) DPATs (Tosylate) DPAMs DPABs |
20 (molar) 10 (molar) 10 (molar) 10 9 |
Methanol |
5 g methenol / 2 g oil |
— |
20 min |
150°C |
100 96 100 92 97 (methyl ester yield) |
Majewski et al., 2009 |
Raw material |
Catalyst |
Catalyst amount (wt%) |
Type of alcohol |
Alcohol/ oil molar ratio |
Microwawe conditions |
Reaction time |
Reaction tempe rature |
Performance (%) |
Ref. |
Waste frying oil |
NaOH |
1 |
Methanol |
6:1 |
600 W |
5 min |
64°C |
93.36 (methyl ester content) |
Yucel et al., 2010 |
Macauba oil |
Novozyme 435 Lipozyme IM |
2.5 5 |
Ethanol Ethanol |
9:1 9:1 |
— |
15 min 5 min |
30°C 40°C |
45.2 35.8 (conversion) |
Nogueira et al., 2010 |
Waste frying palm oil |
NaOH |
3 |
Ethanol |
12:1 |
800 W |
30 s |
— |
97 (conversion) |
Lertsathaporn suk et al., 2008 |
Rapeseed oil |
KOH NaOH |
1 1 |
Methanol Methanol |
6:1 6:1 |
67 % of 1200 W |
5min 3min |
323 K 313 K |
93.7 92.7 (yield) |
Azcan & Danisman, 2008 |
Soybean oil |
nano CaO (heterogen eous catalyst) |
3 |
Methanol |
7:1 |
— |
60 min |
338 K |
96.6 (conversion) |
Hsiao et al., 2011 |
Soybean oil Oleic acid |
sulfated zirconia |
5 |
Methanol |
20:1 |
— |
20 min |
60 °C |
90 (conversion) |
Kim et al., 2011 |
Dry micro algae |
KOH |
2 |
Methanol |
9:1 |
800 W |
6 min |
— |
80.13 (conversion) |
Patil et al., 2011 |
Crude karanja oil |
KOH |
1.33 |
Methanol |
%33.4 (w/w) |
180 W |
150 s |
— |
89.9 (conversion) |
Venkatesh et al., 2011 |
Jatropha oil |
KOH |
1.50 |
Methanol |
7.5:1 |
— |
2 min |
65°C |
97.4 (conversion) |
Shakinaz et al., 2010 |
Crude palm oil |
KOH |
1.50 |
Ethanol |
8.5:1 |
70 W |
5 min |
70°C |
85 (yield) 98.1 (conversion) |
Suppalakpany a et al., 2010 |
Yellow horn oil |
Heteropol yacid (HPA) |
1 |
Methanol |
12:1 |
500 W |
10 min |
60°C |
96.22 (FAMEs) |
Zhang et al., 2010 |
Soybean oil |
NaOH |
1 |
Methanol |
6:1 |
900 W |
1 min |
303 K |
97.7 (conversion) |
Hsiao et al., 2011 |
Canola oil |
ZnO/La2O 2CO3 (heterogen eous catalyst) |
< 1 |
Methanol |
1:1 (w/w) |
< 5 min |
<100°C |
> 95 (yield) |
Jin et al., 2011 |
|
Camelina sativa oil |
Heterogen eous metal oxide catalysts (BaO, SiO) |
1.5 2 |
Methanol |
9:1 |
800 W |
— |
— |
94 80 (FAME yield) |
Patil et al., 2009 |
Castor bean oil |
Al2O3 / 50% KOH SiO2 / 50% H2SO4 SiO2 / 30% H2SO4 |
1 1 1 |
Methanol Methanol Ethanol |
1:6 1:6 1:6 |
40 W 40 W 220 W |
5 min 30 min 25 min |
95 95 95 (conversion) |
Perin et al., 2008 |
|
Castor oil |
H2SO4 / C |
5 |
Methanol |
1:12 |
200 W |
60 min |
338 K |
94 (yield) |
Yuan et al., 2009 |
Triolein |
KOH NaOH |
5 |
Methanol |
1:6 |
25 W |
1 min |
323 K |
98 (conversion) |
Leadbeater & Stencel, 2006 |
Raw material |
Catalyst |
Catalyst amount (wt%) |
Type of alcohol |
Alcohol/ oil molar ratio |
Microwawe conditions |
Reaction time |
Reaction tempe rature |
Performance (%) |
Ref. |
Frying oil |
NaOH |
0.5 |
Ethanol |
1:6 |
50% of 750 W |
4 min |
60°C |
87 (conversion) |
Saifuddin & Chua, 2004 |
Rapeseed oil |
— |
— |
Supercritica l 1-butanol |
2.5:1 |
— |
4 hour 80 bar |
310°C |
91 (fatty acid buthyl ester conversion) |
Geuens et al., 2008 |
Domestic waste vegetable oil Restaurant waste vegetable oil Neat vegetable virgin sunflower oil |
KOH |
1 |
Methanol |
6:1 |
500 W |
1 h |
65°C |
95.79 94.51 96.15 (biodies el yield) |
Refaat et al., 2008 |
Safflower seed oil |
NaOH |
1 |
Methanol |
10:1 |
300 W |
16 min |
60°C |
98.4 (methyl ester content) |
Duz et al., 2011 |
Soybean oil |
NaOH |
1 |
Methanol |
6:1 |
600 W (Ultrasonic) 900 W (Microwave) |
1 min 2 min |
333 K |
97.7 (conversion) |
Hsiao et al., 2010 |
Maize oil |
NaOH |
1.5 |
Methanol |
10:1 |
— |
— |
— |
98 (conversion) |
Ozturk et al., 2010 |
Soybean oil Rice bran oil |
NaOH |
0.6 |
Ethanol |
5:1 |
— |
10 min 73°C |
73°C |
99.25 99.34 (FAME yield) |
Terigar et al., 2010 |
Jatropha curcas |
NaOH |
4 |
Methanol |
30:1 |
— |
7 min |
328 K |
86.3 (conversion) |
Yaakob et al., 2008 |
Sunflower oil |
H2SO4 |
0.05 |
Methanol |
10:1 |
400W |
45 min- |
96.2 (conversion) |
Han et al., 2008 |
|
Sunflower oil |
DO2/SO4 |
0.02 |
Methanol |
12:1 |
300W |
-25 min |
94.3 (biodiesel yield) |
Kong et al., 2009 |
Table 5. Microwave assisted method studies of transesterification reaction in the literature |