Как выбрать гостиницу для кошек
14 декабря, 2021
For the economic analysis an emerging market for solar tower plants is assumed with concentrator costs of 132 €/m2 for a 120 m2 glass-metal heliostat. The receiver costs are 16 k€/m2, 33 k€/m2 and 37.5 k€/m2 for the low, medium and high temperature receiver.
The investment costs for the conventional part (power block incl. BOP) are 560 €/kW for the Mercury system and 510 €/kW for the PGT10 Combined Cycle system.
For the detailed cost calculations a 2nd generation plant is considered. The engineering cost for gas turbine solarisation are shared between 10 similar plants, and the plant is operated remotely in a ‘virtual park’ of 4 similar plants with a high degree of automation. For the calculation of levelized electricity costs (LEC) a debt rate of 75% at 4.2% interest rate is assumed. Other financial parameters are: common equity rate of 25% at 14% rate of return, 2.5% inflation rate, 12 years debt payback time, 20 years plant lifetime.
The results of the LEC calculations for the stand-alone option can be found in [9]. The total LEC range from about 6.3 €cent/kWh to 20 €cent/kWh depending on power level, capacity factor and solar share. The solar incremental LEC are calculated as the additional costs compared to the generation at a market price of 4 €cent/kWh divided by the incremental solar generated electricity. They range from about 12.8 €cent/kWh to 41.4 €cent/kWh for the 2nd generation plants in daytime operation (Table 2).. For the largest system a total LEC of 8.6 €cent/kWh at a solar share above 50% is calculated.
power system |
Mercury-50 800°C |
PGT10 800°C |
PGT10 1000°C |
|
ISO rating |
[MW] |
4.2 |
16.1 |
16.1 |
annual DNI |
[kWh/m2] |
2791 |
2791 |
2791 |
receiver therm. power at DP |
[MW] |
3.5 |
18.5 |
28.59 |
solar fraction at DP |
38.3% |
57.8% |
87.8% |
|
total refl. area |
[m2] |
7038 |
37615 |
62733 |
receiver aperture |
[m2] |
12 |
55 |
82 |
optical tower height |
[m] |
50 |
100 |
130 |
capacity factor |
54.0% |
54.0% |
54.0% |
|
net. electric energy |
[MWh] |
17170 |
66294 |
62738 |
solar incremental electricity |
[MWh] |
3060 |
20511 |
32914 |
incremental solar share |
17.8% |
30.9% |
52.5% |
|
incremental CO2 avoidance |
[t/a] |
1680 |
9537 |
15304 |
incr. solar to electric efficiency |
15.6% |
19.5% |
18.8% |
|
total investment costs |
[T€] |
6302 |
20421 |
26023 |
thereof solar equipment |
33.8% |
37.2% |
47.1% |
|
spec. investment costs |
[€/kWe] |
1801 |
1438 |
1859 |
fixed O&M costs |
[T€/a] |
725 |
1572 |
1887 |
thereof personal expenses |
33.5% |
47.2% |
49.7% |
|
fuel costs |
[€/MWh LHV] |
13.43 |
13.43 |
13.43 |
levelised electricity cost (LEC) |
[€/kWh] |
0.1066 |
0.0764 |
0.0860 |
CO2 avoidance cost |
[€/kg] |
0.6804 |
0.2531 |
0.1884 |
solar incremental LEC |
[€/kWh] |
0.4135 |
0.1577 |
0.1276 |
Table 2: Summary of performance calculation and cost analysis for daytime operation |
Relating the solar LEC to the annual amount of CO2 that can be avoided3 when operating the hybrid plant instead of the pure fossil reference plant, the CO2-avoidance costs can be calculated for each individual plant. For the higher power level a value well below 200 €/ton CO2 can be reached.
a CO2 production from natural gas of 200 kg/MWh LHV is assumed.