Generation-IV Reactors

Gen-IV reactors are the futuristic reactors for which research and development efforts are currently in progress. These reactors will be more efficient, safer, longer lasting (60 years and beyond), proliferation-resistant, and economically viable com­pared to the present nuclear reactors. Six reactor designs were selected at the out­set. They are summarized in Table 1.4 including information on the type (fast or thermal spectrum) of the reactor, coolants, and approximate core outlet tempera­tures. Two reactor concepts, sodium fast reactor (SFR) — along with the advanced burner reactor (ABR) concept under the erstwhile Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative Program) — and very high-temperature reactor (VHTR) under the Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP) are of the highest priority in the United States (Figure 1.15a and b, respectively). VHTR is the reactor concept employed for the Next Generation Nuclear Plant program where the heat generated will cogenerate electricity and hydrogen.

The demanding service conditions (higher neutron doses, exposure to higher temperatures, and corrosive environments) that the structural components will experience in these reactors would pose a significant challenge for the structural materials selection and qualification efforts. Because of the stringent requirements noted above, the materials employed in today’s commercial reactors are not suitable for use in Gen-IV reactors. For example, zirconium alloys (Zircaloy-2, Zircaloy-4, Zr-2.5Nb, M5) have been used routinely as fuel cladding and other reactor internals in both light and heavy water reactors because of their low neutron capture cross section and acceptable mechanical and corrosion resistance in high temperature

Table 1.4 A summary of Gen-IV reactor system designs.

Reactor system

Priority/timeline

Coolant

Neutron

Core outlet

spectrum

temperature

TO

Gas-cooled fast

Medium/long term

Gas (e. g., He)

Fast

~850

reactor (GFR) Lead-cooled

Medium/long term

Liquid metal

Fast

550-800

reactor (LFR)

(e. g., Pb, Pb-Bi)

Molten salt

Low/long term

Molten salt

Thermal

700-800

reactor (MSR)

(e. g., fluoride salts)

Sodium-cooled

High/mid term

Liquid metal (Na)

Fast

~550

fast reactor (SFR) Very high-

High/mid term

Gas (e. g., He),

Thermal

> 900

temperature reactor (VHTR)

CO2

Supercritical

Medium/long term

Water

Thermal/fast

280-620

water-cooled reactor (SCWR)

image019

Figure 1.15 Schematics of (a) a sodium fast reactor and (b) a very high-temperature reactor. (Courtesy: US Department of Energy Gen-IV Initiative)

(probably never exceeding 350-380 °C under normal service conditions) aqueous environment. However, higher temperatures envisioned in Gen-IV reactors would limit the use of zirconium alloys because of increased susceptibility to hydrogen embrittlement due to severe hydride formation, allotropic phase changes at higher temperatures (a-fi phase), poor creep properties, and oxidation. It is instructive to note that some high-performance zirconium alloys may be of possible use in rela­tively low-temperature Gen-IV reactor design (such as SCWR). Furthermore, the out-of-core components (pressure vessel, piping, etc.) may need to be made from materials other than the low-alloy ferritic steels (e. g., A533B) currently employed primarily because similar components in Gen-IV reactors are expected to withstand much higher temperatures and neutron doses. Some of the fabrication difficulty involved in the VHTR construction demands mention here. For example, the pres­sure vessel for VHTR reactor as shown in Figure 1.16 is about double the size of the currently operating PWRs. Heavy component forgings will be needed in the construction of these huge pressure vessels.

image020

Figure 1.16 A schematic size comparison between the reactor pressure vessels in a typical PWR and a conceptual VHTR. Courtesy: Nuclear News.

Test Reactors

So far we have discussed the past, current, and future nuclear reactors in detail. Now let us discuss about a test reactor. One of the well-known test reactors in the United States is the Advanced Test Reactor located at the Idaho National Laboratory near Idaho Falls, ID. ATR is a flagship reactor that serves the US Department of Energy, Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program, and different other governmental and commercial entities. It also acts as a user facility that the university-led teams can use to irradiate materials and perform postirradiation examination (PIE) upon going through a competitive proposal process. ATR started its operation in 1967 and is being operated continuously since then with 250+ days of operation in an average year. A view section of the ATR is shown in Figure 1.17.

ATR is a pressurized, light water cooled and moderated, 250 MWth reactor with beryllium reflectors and hafnium control drums. The metallic fuel (U or U — Mo) is in the plate morphology clad in an aluminum alloy. There are 40 fuel assemblies in the reactor core; each core contains 19 fuel plates. At 250 MW, maximum thermal neutron flux is ~1015 n cm-2 s-1, and the maximum fast neu­tron flux could reach 5 x 1014 ncm~2s~ Thus, ATR can be used to study the radiation damage under the fast neutron spectrum. The ATR has 77 irradiation positions (4 flux traps, 5 in-pile tubes, and 68 in-reflector) (for details, see Figure 1.18). The reactor pressure vessel is made of stainless steel, and is 3.65 m in diameter and ~10.67 m in height. Table 1.5 lists some of the differ­ences between ATR and a typical PWR.

ATR even though used for neutron irradiation experiments is not a fast reactor facility. Note that at present the United States does not have any operating/underconstruction fast reactor test facility (EBR-II and FFTF facili­ties were shut down during 1990s) as opposed to countries like France (Phe — nix), India (prototype fast breeder reactor (PFBR)), Japan (Joyo and Monju), Russia (BOR-60), and China (China experimental fast reactor (CEFR). The lack of a fast reactor facility is a challenge for the US nuclear R&D commu­nity. The proposed Advanced Burner Test Reactor (ABTR), a sodium-cooled fast reactor, is still under the planning stage, and there is no further confir­mation of its installation yet.

 

1.9