Как выбрать гостиницу для кошек
14 декабря, 2021
L. L. Snead
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA
M. Ferraris
Politecnico di Torino, Italy © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Introduction
Background
Plasma-Facing Materials Particle-Matter Interactions The Advantages of Carbon as a PFC Plasma Impurities and the Need for Graphite Materials Thermomechanical Loading of PFMs Transient Loading of PFMs
Irradiation Effects on Thermophysical Properties of Graphite and CFCs
Graphite Irradiation Damage Surface Effects
Properties and Property Evolution of Graphite Fiber Composite
Irradiation-induced dimensional changes in CFCs Irradiation-induced changes in strength and modulus Thermal conductivity degradation Plasma-Particle Interactions Chemical Erosion
Doping of Graphite to Suppress Erosion Physical Sputtering Radiation-Enhanced Sublimation Erosion of Graphite in Simulated Disruption Events Tritium Retention in Graphitic Materials HHF Component Technology Joining of CFC to Heat Sink Evaluation of HHF Joint Summary and Conclusions
Abbreviations |
|
ASTM |
ASTM International |
CFC |
Carbon(graphite) fiber |
composite |
|
CTE |
Coefficient of thermal |
expansion |
|
CVD |
Chemical vapor deposition |
DPA |
Displacement per atom |
EU |
European Union |
FoMd |
Disruption figure of merit |
FoMth |
Thermal figure of merit |
GMP |
Galvanic Metallization Process |
HIP |
Hot isostatic press |
ITER |
International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor |
JET |
Joint European Torus |
LAM |
Low activation materials |
PAN |
Polyacrylonitrile |
PFC |
Plasma facing component |
PFM |
Plasma facing material(s) |
PVD |
Physical vapor deposition |
RES |
Radiation enhanced sublimation |
RT |
Room temperature |
SATIR |
Transient infrared thermography |
SEM |
Scanning electron microscopy |
XRD |
X-ray Diffraction |
4.18.1 Introduction
Graphite-moderated, gas-cooled reactors led the way into the nuclear age starting with the Chicago Pile-1 reactor, where the first controlled and sustained critical nuclear reaction was initiated in December 1942. The first commercial nuclear power plant, Calder Hall in the United Kingdom, went critical in 1956. As the graphite moderator was literally at the core of these early reactors, graphite became one of the first and most extensively studied nuclear materials. As discussed in Chapter 4.10, Radiation Effects in Graphite, the fission-born neutron results in significant thermophysical property changes in graphite. Moreover, depending on the type of fission reactor, other environmental factors such as graphite oxidation become extremely important. In addition to being the moderator of gas-cooled reactors, graphite has found a number of new nuclear power applications. As examples, pyrolytic graphite is a key functional element in TRi ISOtropic (TRISO) fuels, which continue to be developed and utilized for gas-cooled reactors; carbon fiber composites (CFCs) are now under development for core application in high — temperature gas-cooled reactors1 and have been widely used as plasma-facing components (PFCs) in fusion reactors.2 The latter application began in 1978, when the Princeton Large Torus made a transition from tungsten to graphite ‘limiters.’ This enabled the first thermonuclear temperatures, beginning the widespread application of graphite materials in fusion systems, the subject of this chapter. As will be discussed, the primary motivation for the use of graphite in fusion systems is not (as in fission reactors) for neutron moderation, but for reasons related to its exceptional high temperature performance and its relatively innocuous interaction with the plasma. However, the fusion reactor environmental effects on graphite, including irradiation-induced property evolution, are very similar to those of their fission reactor analogs.
In contrast to the fission of heavy elements such as uranium or plutonium, which releases a large amount of energy in their fission fragments and a moderate amount of energy in the form of neutron kinetic energy (mean about 1 MeV), fusion can occur for a number of light elements, some of which have reactions that release very high-kinetic-energy neutrons. Several possible routes to fusion are shown below in
1H1 +1 H1 !1 D2 + positron = 1.4MeV
1H1 +1 D2 !2 He3 = 5.5 MeV
1H1 +1 T3 !2 He4 = 19.9 MeV
1D2 +1 D2 !2 He3 + neutron = 3.3 MeV
1D2 +1 D2 !1 T3 +1 H1 = 4.0MeV
1D2 +1 T3 !2 He4 + neutron = 17.6MeV
1D2 +2He3 !2 He4 +1H1 = 18.2 MeV I1]
For any of these reactions to take place, the ionized atoms must be brought together with sufficient force to overcome the coulombic barrier. In thermonuclear fusion, this is accomplished by heating the ‘plasma’ of these atoms to the point where the kinetic energy is sufficient to overcome that barrier. Currently, it is thought that D+T fusion is the most accessible route to fusion, though the gaseous temperature required for D+T reaction is more than 50 million Kelvin.
Control and containment of high-temperature, high-density fusion plasmas is the primary challenge and obstacle to fusion power. Many reactor concepts have been studied in the past and attention is now focused on the ‘tokamak’ system. This toroidal confinement machine system was developed in the mid-1960s in Russia. In this design, a high-strength twisted helix of magnetic lines forms a magnetic bottle. Ions, which are trapped within a certain gyro — radius, travel along these lines circulating around the helix in opposition to the plasma electrons. For non — collisional plasmas, the ions can be heated by magnetic induction or through various external means to the extreme temperature necessary for the fusion reaction to take place. This concept is the basis for the four largest present-day fusion machines (Table 1), and is the premise for the ITER machine currently under construction. To give an idea of scale, in all of the present-day machines listed in Table 1, the helical cavity is big enough in size for an adult to walk within, and the radius from the center of the machine to the middle of the helix is typically several meters. A depiction of the inside of the JET torus, complete with beryllium-coated CFC wall, is given in Figure 1.