Как выбрать гостиницу для кошек
14 декабря, 2021
As differences in dose rates can confound direct comparison between neutron and ion irradiations, it is important to assess their impact. A simple method for examining the tradeoff between dose and temperature in comparing irradiation effects from different particle types is found in the invariance requirements. For a given change in dose rate, we would like to know what change in dose (at the same temperature) is required to cause the same number of defects to be absorbed at sinks. Alternatively, for a given change in dose rate, we would like to know what change in temperature (at the same dose) is required to cause the same number of defects to be absorbed at sinks. The number of defects per unit volume, NR, that have recombined up to time t, is given by Mansur14
|
|||
|
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
energy of 1.3 eV, the experiment will be invariant in Ns with the BWR core irradiation (e. g., RIS) at a proton irradiation temperature of 400 °C. Similarly, using eqn [16], a proton irradiation temperature of 300 °C will result in an invariant Rs (e. g., swelling or loop growth). For a Ni2+ ion irradiation at a dose rate of 10~3 dpas, the respective temperatures are 675 °C (Ns invariant) and 340 °C (Rs invariant). In other words, the temperature ‘shift’ due to the higher dose rate is dependent on the microstructure feature of interest. Also, with increasing difference in dose rate, the AT between neutron and ion irradiation increases substantially. The nominal irradiation temperatures selected for proton irradiation, 360 °C and for Ni2+ irradiation, 500 °C represent compromises between the extremes for invariant Ns and Rs.