Confinement of radioactivity

This safety function is ensured by protecting and maintaining the integrity of the potential radioactivity release barriers (fuel, reactor system boundary and containment). These barriers are passive components as themselves; in addition, several passive means are proposed in V — 407 and V-392 concepts for the protection of these barriers (some of them are reflected above). As the containment is the last and most important barrier, both these designs imply substantial improvement of the containment protection against different loads related to

design basis and severe accidents, and various passive systems are important part of this protection in V-407 and V-392 designs. This design decision is derived from the assumption that the active systems are more vulnerable to failures under conditions inside the containment during an accident.

In V-407 design, containment over-pressurization is avoided by passive containment cooling system (C-PHRS) as described above. To limit considerably the release of fission products beyond the containment, a permanent under-pressure is maintained in the inter-containment gap of the V-392 design. This safety function, one of the most important, is fulfilled by two systems: (1) an exhaust ventilation system equipped with a filtering plant with suction from the inter-containment gap and outlet into the stack; (2) a passive system of suction from the inter-containment gap. The first system is intended to control removal of steam-gas mixture from the inter-containment gap under accidents with total loss of power. The system is capable to remove at least 240 kg per hour that is equivalent to the inner containment leaks of 1.5% containment volume per 24 hours. The second system consists of lines connecting the inter-containment gap with the PHRS exhaust ducts, which are always in the hot state. This solution enables permanent removal and purification of inner containment leaks irrespective of the electricity supply and operator actions. According to estimations, the under-pressure is maintained at any point of the inter-containment gap with inner containment leaks up to 2.8% of containment volume per day (the design basis for the containment is 0.3%). The technical solution described above in combination with the systems for the containment pressure decrease (traditional spray system and new passive heat removal system) allows to give up the filtered venting system designed for V-392 in spite of this system follows the current requirements that filtered venting should not increase the risk of loosing the containment function and filtered venting is not required in the short term of a core melt accident.

Special systems and components are implemented in both new WWER designs to prevent hydrogen burning or explosion. For example, in V-392 design the hydrogen suppression system comprises passive catalytic hydrogen igniters based on an efficient high porosity cellular material. Each of 50 elements of this system is capable to oxidize about 30 grams of hydrogen per hour at its volumetric concentration 4%. This system prevents the explosive concentration of hydrogen even if 100% of the core Zr will be oxidized during an accident.

image067