Power-Reactor Feedback

The neutron kinetics equations (Eqs. 6 11 and 6.12) that were applied to zero-power reactors also hold for power reactors However, additional relations exist here between reactor power and reactivity because the former is high enough to cause effects on the latter (see Fig. 6.4). This feedback of reactor power to reactivity is the

—*K+>

kfb

H, FEEDBACK

TRANSFER FUNCTION

Fig. 6.4—Relations between the feedback and the zero — power transfer functions which make up the transfer func­tion of a power reactor

important characteristic of power-reactor dynamics. As might be expected, transfer-function measurements are used to obtain information about this feedback.

Equations that relate power to reactivity can be numerous and complex, depending on the system. Specific forms for boiling — and pressunzed-water reactors have been summarized 74 Where commonly a set of linear differential equations adequately represent the system, the feedback transfer function from power to reactivity may be written

kfb(s) Y’ rijd+TgS)

Подпись:

Подпись: Method and excitation Reactors used Results Random pulsing of a neutron source GE Critical Assembly,5 Rubeole and Ulysse,6 UFTR,7,8 University of Florida subcnticals,9 0 0/1, subcntical reactivity Oscillating control CP-2,4 DFR,11 EBR-1 and EBR-2,1 2,1 3 EBWR,1 4 (t/l, verification of equip- rod Fermi,15 GTRR,1 6,17 KEWB,18 Kiwi-A,19 LPTR,20 LAMPRE-1,1 9 NORA,2 1 Pathfinder,2 2 Penn State,23 PTR,2 4 SHE,25 SPERT,2 6 Zephyr and Zeus11 ’2 7 ment performance Variance to mean (no excitation) AGN-201,28 Cornell,29 Ford,30 Homogeneous D2О Facility,31 NORA,21 32 Russian subcntical,33 SPERT-2 and SPERT-4,34'35 Tokyo Inst of Technology,36 ZPR-4,37,38 ZPR-537 0/1, absolute power level Pseudorandom con- ATSR,39 Brookhaven,40 Godiva-П,41 JRR-3 and (5/1, verification of equip- trol rod SHE,4 2 44 MSRE,443 Saxton,45 UFTR* ment performance Spectral analysis Atomics Int ,46 Babcock & Wilcox Test Reactor,47 0/1, subcntical re- and/or autocor* BSR,48-49 Battelle Plutonium Assembly,50 activity, absolute relation (no excitations) Brookhaven High Flux,5 0 a EBWR,51 Daphne and Jason,52,5 3 GLEEP,54, HFIR,55 HTR, JRR-1, SHE, and TRR-1,4 2 43'55a-55b ,owa State Umv _ UTR-10,5 6 KEWB and SRE,57 LFR,58 MSRE,59 NORA,2 1 ORNL Pool,6 0,61 Penn State,2 3 Savannah,62 Saxton,63 SPERT-1,34 SPERT-3, ATRC, ARMF-1, and PBF,64 SNAP-10A and ETR,65’66 UFTR,7’8 Westinghouse CES,67 ZPR-3, ZPR-4, ZPR-5, ZPR-7, and Argonaut,68 ZPR-66 8 a power level Two-detector cross GTRR,1 6 JPDR,55a Karlsruhe Argonaut,68b (i/l, subcntical reac- correlation (no ORNL Pool,69 Penn State,69a STARK,70 tivity, local power excitation) Savannah SR-305 Pile,71 TRR-1,72 ZPR-97 3 distribution
Подпись: Table 6.6—Results Achieved in Zero-Power Dynamic Studies

nfs)/N “ H(S) " 2j 7‘ П k (1 + Tlks)
1

Подпись: G(s) =Подпись:

Подпись: Table 6.7—Results Achieved in At-Power Dynamics Studies Method and excitation Reactors used Results Oscillating control BORAX-4 and BORAX-5,’5’76 DFR,11 EBR-1 Stability study, feedback rod and EBR2,12’13 77 EBWR,H'n Fermi,15 GE BWR,79 HTR,80 JPDR,8oa SPERT l,26 SRE,81 VBWR8 2 determination Pseudorandom con- Kiwi-АЗ,41 MSRE,4 4a’8 3 Saxton,84 ,8 5 JRR-38sa Stability study, control- trol rod system study Spectral analysis BORAX-1,-2,-4, and -5,75 ’’ 6,8 6 Chapelcross,8 7 Stability study, noise- (no excitation) Dresden,88 EBR-2,89 EBWR,90-92 Elk River,9 3 GTR,9 4 HBWR,9 5 HFIR and ORR,5 9 ’*6,9 7 HFBR,98 HRE-2," HTR and JRR-1 and JRR-2,42 -4 з.8 0.1 0 0.1 0 0 a Indlan polnt> Savannah, and Yankee,62 JPDR,553'1 00a Kyoto Umv.,1 01 ML-1,102 Pluto,53 Saxton,63 SPERT-4,1 03 SRE,81 THOR,1 04 Trino,85 VBWR105’106 source determinations Pseudorandom Nerva,1 01 Phoebus 1A,1 08 SNAP109 Intervariable transfer plant control functions Cross correlation DFR,1 1 0 DMTR,11 oa SNAP,46 Pathfinder111 Stability study, inter- and spectral variable transfer analysis functions, noise- source determinations

where s = ICO and the values of т are time constants associated with a system variable that has a feedback reactivity change of y, percent for a 1% power change (in the limit of very slow transients).

The transfer function between an external excitation reactivity, kln, such as an oscillator rod, and the reactor power is the solution of Eqs 6 14 and 6.17 if к = 1 + kln + kfb is used

G0(s)

1 — G0(s) H(s)

Since G0 is well known, this equation is generally used to obtain H(s) or G(s) from the other