Как выбрать гостиницу для кошек
14 декабря, 2021
The PIPExp database has evolved over a period of about ten years. A first database version was developed with financial support from the Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate (SKI). Since the conclusion of the initial R&D effort in 1998 an active maintenance program has supported the database.
Designed in Access, the database consists of searchable free-format text fields and a large number of data fields that are used as data filters in support of a range of data processing needs. Table D. A. 1 is a summary of text and data fields.
D. A.2 Completeness and Quality Management
The completeness of the pipe failure data is addressed through a continuous database management program. Extracted from Monthly Summary Reports, Table D. A.2 provides snapshots of the database evolution from 1998 to the present. In PIPExp, each record is assigned a ‘Quality Index’ (Table D. A.1, item #4, and Table D. A.3) as one means of monitoring the completeness and technical accuracy of source information as well as the process of classifying and coding of the source information.
Table D. A.1 Description of Data Fields in PIPExp
Item No. |
Field Name |
Type |
Description |
1 |
UPDATE |
Date |
Date of the most recent update. |
2 |
MER |
Yes/No21 |
Multiple Events Report; some reports include information on more than one crack/leak in one system. Used to identify events where a discovery resulted in an investigation (e. g., augmented ISI) to identify further piping degradation due to a common cause. A new record is added if additional degradation is positively identified (by component socket). |
3 |
DDA |
Text |
Data filter used to classify a record as either ‘public’ (= Licensee Event Report), ‘restricted’ or ‘proprietary.’ |
4 |
QA-Index |
Number |
QA-Index of ‘1’ signifies a data entry determined to be ‘complete.’ By contrast, a QA-Index of ‘6’ signifies a database entry for which only a LER (or equivalent) abstract was available. |
5 |
EVENT DATE |
Date |
Event date (MM/DD/YY); date of discovery (in case of ISI). |
6 |
PLANT TYPE |
Text |
Plant type; e. g., BWR, PWR, used as data filter. |
7 |
DESIGN |
Text |
NSSS design/design generation; keyword using generally accepted or standard nomenclature. This field is used as a data filter. |
8 |
NSSS-VENDOR |
Text |
Reactor vendor; e. g., ABB-Atom, KWU/Siemens, Westinghouse; used as data filter. |
9 |
PLANT NAME |
Text |
Plant name |
10 |
COUNTRY |
Text |
Two-letter code based on the ISO 3166-1-alpha-2 code elements. |
11 |
CONSTRUCTOR |
Text |
Name of company responsible for the original piping system design. The default name is the architect engineering firm. Used as data filter. |
12 |
COD |
Date |
Date (MM/DD/YY) of commercial operation as default. If known, date of initial criticality. For U. S. data, based on NUREG-0020 |
13 |
PLANT |
Text |
Plant operational state (at the time of discovery); keyword using generally accepted or standard nomenclature. This field is used as a data |
21 A check box without check mark implies ‘No’ or ‘Unknown/Pending.’ |
Item No. |
Field Name |
Type |
Description |
OPERATIONAL STATE — POS |
filter. Pulldown menu with the following options: § CSD — Cold Shutdown § HSD — Hot Shutdown § HSB — Hot Standby § Refueling § Shutting Down § Starting Up § Power Operation |
||
14 |
REFERENCE-1 |
Text |
Primary reference |
15 |
REFERENCE-2 |
Text |
Secondary (or supplemental) reference |
16 |
REFERENCE-3 |
Text |
Tertiary (or supplemental) reference |
17 |
LER-RO? |
Yes/No |
Check if the information source is a Licensee Event Report (or equivalent); i. e., from a regulatory reporting system. |
18 |
EVENT TYPE |
Text |
Event type; ‘Crack’, ‘Wall Thinning’, ‘P/H-leak’ (P/H = pinhole), ‘Leak’, ‘Severance’, ‘Rupture.’ Used as data filter. |
19 |
FAILURE-ON- DEMAND |
Yes/No |
Check if pipe failure occurred when a demand was placed on the affected system (e. g., standby system). Used as data filter. |
20 |
SYNERGY |
Yes/No |
Check if the pipe failure was caused by multiple degradation mechanisms; e. g., crack initiation through IGSCC and crack propagation through thermal fatigue. Used as data filter. |
21 |
DEGRADATION+ LOADING |
Yes/No |
Check if the pipe failure resulted from the combined effect of a degradation mechanism (e. g., flow-accelerated corrosion, FAC) and a severe (or unusual) loading condition. Used as data filter. |
22 |
ECA |
Text |
Event Category. Used as data filter. This database field is used to characterize actual or potential impact on plant risk by a degradation or failure. The following options are available: § S-/M-/L-LOCA (implies that a pressure boundary failure resulted in ESF actuation); § S-/M-/L-LOCA Precursor (implies mitigation of a pressure boundary failure through prompt operator response; e. g., plant shutdown prior to reaching ESF actuation setpoint); § Internal Flooding (spill rate in excess of room/compartment floor drain capacity); § Internal Flooding Precursor (accumulation of large water volumes prevented through prompt operator response); § Common Cause Initiating (CCI) Event (pressure boundary failure results in spatial effects through spraying or steaming of safety equipment); § CCI Precursor (pressure boundary failure results in spraying or steaming but prompt operator action prevents safety equipment from being affected); § System Disabled (pressure boundary failure is large enough to incapacitate a system function); § System Degraded (default used for at-power events that result in an entry into a Technical Specification Action Statement). |
23 |
CCC |
Yes/No |
Check if event is considered to be a ‘common cause candidate’ (CCC) event. Used as data filter. |
24 |
CA |
Text |
Corrective Action. Used as data filter. The following types of corrective action are defined: § REPAIR (used in a generic sense); § REPLACEMENT § REPLACEMENT — IN-KIND § REPLACEMENT — NEW MATERIAL § TEMP. REPAIR (temporary repair to allow continued operation until next refueling outage or major maintenance outage at which time a Code-repair (which would require system isolation and |
Item No. |
Field Name |
Type |
Description |
draining) or a replacement is performed. § WOR (= weld overlay repair); primarily applies to ASME Section XI Class 1 or 2 (or equivalent) piping. |
|||
25 |
ISS |
Yes/No |
Safety system actuation; check if pipe failure resulted automatic actuation of a make-up system or other safety system. Used as data filter. |
26 |
IRT |
Yes/No |
Automatic reactor trip; check if pipe failure resulted in automatic reactor trip/turbine trip. Used as data filter. |
27 |
IPO |
Text |
Impact of pipe failure on plant operation; e. g., power reduction, manual reactor trip. Used as data filter. |
28 |
TTR |
Number |
Repair time in hours. |
29 |
TTR-Class |
Number |
A data filter: 1: TTR < 8 hours; 2: 8 < TTR < 24 hours; 3: 24 < TTR < 96 hours; 4: 96 < TTR <168 hours; 5: TTR > 168 hours. |
30 |
NARRATIVE |
Memo |
Event narrative; includes details on plant condition prior to event and plant response during event, method of detection, corrective action plan. This field should include sufficient information to support independent verification of the event data classification. |
31 |
LQT |
Number |
Quantity of process medium released [kg] |
32 |
DOL |
Text |
Duration of release |
33 |
LRT |
Number |
Leak rate [kg/s] |
34 |
gpm |
Number |
Leak rate [U. S. gallons/minute] |
35 |
LEAK CLASS |
Number |
A data filter: 1: Leak Rate (LR) < 1 gpm; 2: 1 < LR < 5 gpm; 3: 5 < LR < 10 gpm; 4: 10 < LR < 50 gpm; 5: LR > 50 gpm. |
36 |
FLO |
Text |
Location of crack/leak/rupture; description of where in the piping system a degradation or failure occurred. Include sufficient detail to support the consequence evaluation/classification. |
37 |
K1 |
Yes/No |
Data filter; steamline break outside containment. |
38 |
K2 |
Yes/No |
Data filter; feedwater line break |
39 |
K3 |
Yes/No |
Data filter; steamline break inside containment. |
40 |
IMPULSE-LINE |
Yes/No |
Check (= ‘Yes’) if affected line is a valve impulse line. |
41 |
INSTR. LINE |
Yes/No |
Check (= ‘Yes’) if affected line is an instrument sensing line. |
42 |
ISOMETRIC DRAWING # |
Text |
Isometric drawing number |
43 |
P&ID # |
Text |
Piping and instrument drawing number. |
44 |
MSA |
Text |
Name of the affected plant system |
45 |
SHARED |
Yes/No |
Check (= ‘Yes’) if affected piping is shared by two reactor units. Mainly applies to support systems (e. g., Service Water, Instrument Air) where sections of a piping system may be shared by two reactor units; this is relatively common in the U. S. |
46 |
OSA |
Text |
Name of other systems affected by the degradation or failure. Secondary effects of piping failure |
47 |
S-TYPE |
Text |
Category of system affected by the degradation or failure. Used as data filter. The following types are used: • RCPB (Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary); • SIR (Safety Injection & Recirculation); includes emergency core cooling systems & decay heat removal). • CS (Containment Spray) • AUX (Reactor Auxiliary Systems); includes component cooling water, chemical & volume control, reactor water cleanup, control rod drive, containment heat removal, standby liquid control, radwaste control, spent fuel pool cooling. • FWC (Feedwater & Condensate Systems) • STEAM (Main Steam System) • SUPPORT (Service Water & Instrument Air systems) • PCS (turbine generator) • FIRE (Fire Protection). |
Item No. |
Field Name |
Type |
Description |
48 |
ISO |
Yes/No |
Check if the affected pipe section can be isolated to prevent or mitigate direct/indirect impacts. |
49 |
DET |
Text |
Method of detection; e. g., ISI, WT = walk-through inspection, leak detection system in combination with control room indication and/or alarm. Used as data filter. Pulldown menu with the following options: § Walk-through § UT-examination § Liquid penetrant testing § Hydrotesting § Leak detection § Containment/drywell inspection § Control Room Indication |
50 |
DRYWELL ENTRY |
Yes/No |
BWR-specific data field. Checked for ‘at-power’, unidentified P/H-leak or leak requiring power reduction or reactor shutdown for containment drywell entry to determine leak source. Used as a data filter. Also, this data could be input to plant availability models. |
51 |
CONTAINMENT ENTRY |
Yes/No |
Check if power reduction initiated to allow for containment entry to identify source of leakage. Used for other than BWR plants. |
52 |
CRS |
Text |
Verbal description of crack morphology; orientation and size/ geometry of crack or fracture |
53 |
CRACK-DEPTH |
Number |
Crack depth in percent of wall thickness (a/t-ratio) |
54 |
AXIAL-LENGTH |
Number |
Axial crack length in [mm]. |
55 |
CRACK-LENGTH |
Number |
Circumferential crack length as percent of inside diameter |
56 |
ASPECT-RATIO |
Number |
Ratio of crack depth (a) to flaw length (L) |
57 |
WELD-CONFIG |
Text |
Configuration of the affected weld in a piping system; e. g., BP = bend-to — pipe weld, PP = pipe-to-pipe weld, etc. |
58 |
INSIDE CONTAINMENT |
Yes/No |
Check if pipe failure located inside containment |
59 |
AUXILIARY BUILDING |
Yes/No |
Check if pipe failure located in Auxiliary Building (PWR) |
60 |
REACTOR BUILDING |
Yes/No |
Check if pipe failure located in Reactor Building (BWR) |
61 |
TURBINE BUILDING |
Yes/No |
Check if pipe failure located in Turbine Building |
62 |
Not used |
N/A |
N/A |
63 |
Not used |
N/A |
N/A |
64 |
CTA |
Text |
Component Type; pulldown menu with the following options: § Bend § Elbow § Elbow — 45-degree § Elbow — 90-degree § Elbow — LR (Long Radius) § Pipe § Reducer § Tee § Weld § Socket weld |
65 |
ASME Class |
Number |
Differentiate between 1, 2, 3 and 4 (= non-Code Class) |
66 |
BELOW-GRADE |
Yes/No |
Check if ‘Yes’; Below Grade / Underground Piping. Used as data filter. |
67 |
FIELD-WELD |
Yes/No |
Check if ‘Yes’. Used as data filter. |
68 |
SHOP-WELD |
Yes/No |
Check if ‘Yes’. Used as data filter. |
69 |
CONCRETE-LINED |
Yes/No |
Check if ‘Yes’; could apply to essential or non-essential service water (or equivalent) system piping. Used as data filter. |
70 |
REPLACEMENT |
Yes/No |
Check if piping replaced using new material. |
71 |
REPL-DATE |
Date/Time |
Date of component (e. g., weld and spool piece) replacement. Used in hazard plotting. |
Item No. |
Field Name |
Type |
Description |
72 |
YOO |
Number |
Years of commercial operation when failure occurred. Used in aging analysis. |
73 |
AGE |
Number |
Age of component socket [hours]. Used in hazard plotting. For additional information. |
74 |
CLASS |
Number |
Based on diameter; events grouped in six diameter classes; 1 = (< DN15), 2 = (15 < DN < 25), 3 = (25 < DN < 50), 4 = (50 < DN < 100), 5 = (100 < DN < 250), 6 = (> DN250). DN = nominal diameter in [mm]. This field is used as a data filter. |
75 |
THOMAS |
Number |
Ratio of diameter and pipe wall thickness ([CSI/WTK]); for details, see the paper by H. M. Thomas (1981): “Pipe and Vessel Failure Probability,” Reliability Engineering, 2:83-124. This field is used as a data filter. |
76 |
CSI |
Number |
Nominal diameter [DN] in [mm]. Used as data filter. |
77 |
WTK |
Number |
Wall thickness [mm] |
78 |
SCHEDULE |
Number |
Pipe schedule number |
79 |
DIS-MET |
Yes/No |
Dissimilar metal weld; check if ‘yes’. Used as data filter. |
80 |
MTR |
Text |
Material; e. g., carbon steel, stainless steel, etc. Used as data filter. |
81 |
MTR-DES |
Text |
Material designation according to national standard; e. g., AISI 304, SS2343, etc. Used as data filter. |
82 |
PMD |
Text |
Process medium. Used as data filter. |
83 |
RAW WATER |
Text |
Source of raw water (applies to Fire Protection and Service Water piping); differentiate between LAKE — RIVER — SEA-BRACKISH. Used as data filter. |
84 |
STG |
Yes/No |
Normally stagnant process medium? Used as data filter. |
85 |
HWC |
Yes/No |
For BWRs; hydrogen water chemistry; check if ‘Yes’. Used as data filter (e. g., in factor-of-influence assessments). |
86 |
HWC-START |
Date/Time |
Date when HWC was introduced |
87 |
NMCA |
Yes/No |
Check if Noble Metal Chemical Addition. Used as data filter. |
88 |
NMCA-Start |
Date/Time |
Date when NMCA started. |
89 |
IHSI |
Yes/No |
Induction heat stress improvement; check if ‘Yes’. Used as data filter. |
90 |
IHSI-DATE |
Date/Time |
Date when IHSI was performed |
91 |
MSIP |
Yes/No |
Check if Mechanical Stress Improvement Process applied to weld. Used as data filter. |
92 |
MSIP-Date |
Date/Time |
Date of MSIP application |
93 |
S-A |
Number |
Stress intensity allowance; ratio of the critical stress intensity factor to the assessed stress intensity factor given a flaw. This information is extracted from fracture mechanics evaluations. |
94 |
OPA |
Number |
Operating temperature [°C] |
95 |
DPA |
Number |
Design temperature [°C] |
96 |
OPB |
Number |
Operating pressure [MPa] |
97 |
DPB |
Number |
Design pressure [MPa] |
98 |
OPC |
Text |
Process medium chemistry (for primary system); e. g., NWC = normal water chemistry, HWC = hydrogen water chemistry. Used as data filter. |
99 |
MPR |
Text |
Method of fabrication; e. g., cold formed, hot formed. Used as data filter. |
100 |
SYS |
Yes/No |
Systematic failure? Used as data filter to enable queries that address the effectiveness of remedial actions (e. g., preventing recurring failures). |
101 |
RFL |
Text |
Description of the extent and nature of a systematic failure |
102 |
REST |
Yes/No |
Failure due to deficient system restoration?; e. g., no venting prior to fill procedure, etc. Used as data filter. |
103 |
CEA |
Text |
Apparent cause of failure; e. g., IGSCC, PWSCC, TGSCC, etc. Used as data filter. Pull down menu with the following options: • B/A SCC (B/A = boric acid) • Corrosion (general, pitting or crevice corrosion) • Corrosion-fatigue • Erosion |
Item No. |
Field Name |
Type |
Description |
• Erosion-cavitation • Flow accelerated corrosion (FAC) • Fretting • HF: Construction/installation error • HF: Human error • HF: Repair/maintenance error • HF: Welding error • HPSCC (High Potential SCC) • IGSCC • MIC (Microbiologically induced corrosion) • Overpressurization • PWSCC • Severe overloading (other than water hammer) • SICC (Strain-rate induced SCC) • TGSCC • Thermal fatigue • Unknown • Unreported • Vibration • Vibration-fatigue • Water hammer |
|||
104 |
EPRI-CODE |
Text |
Failure code as used in the EPRI ’97 / EPRI ’98 databases (see for example EPRI TR-110161 (Piping System Reliability and Failure Rate Estimation Models for Use in Risk-Informed In-Service Inspection Applications, December 1998). Used as data filter. Pull down menu with the following options: § CF — Corrosion-fatigue § COR — General corrosion, microbiologically induced corrosion (MIC), pitting corrosion § COR-EXT — external corrosion § D&C — Design & Construction errors § E-C — Erosion-cavitation § E/C — Erosion-corrosion § FRET — Fretting § HE — Human Error § OVP — Overpressurization § SCC — Stress corrosion cracking § TF — Thermal Fatigue § UNK — Unknown § VF — Vibration-fatigue § WH — Water hammer |
105 |
RC1 |
Text |
Contributing factor number 1 |
106 |
RC2 |
Text |
Contributing factor number 2 |
107 |
CEC |
Memo |
Description of events and causal factors. Include sufficient technical detail from the root cause analysis process so that recurrence may be prevented. |
108 |
CMT |
Memo |
Any other information of relevance to understanding of underlying causal factors. Also, information on the type and extent of repair/replacement. The purpose of this free-format database field is to facilitate future applications, for example, by codifying the information on piping replacements. |
109 |
ISI |
Yes/No |
Deficient ISI; e. g., ISI not performed, or ISI failed to detect a flaw. Used as data filter to identify events caused by ISI program deficiencies (e. g., affected component should have been included in program) or an inspection prior to failure missed a degradation that propagated in the |
Item No. |
Field Name |
Type |
Description |
through-wall direction. |
|||
110 |
ISI-CMT |
Memo |
Comments on ISI history; e. g., date of last inspection, details on examination technique(s). |
111 |
mCF |
Yes/No |
Check if there are multiple circumferential flaws in a weld. |
112 |
Number of Flaws |
Number |
|
113 |
D0-1 |
Number |
Distance from 12 o’clock position to the first circumferential flaw; this field is repeated for up to nine flaws. |
114 |
CF-1 |
Number |
Length of the first circumferential flaw (counted from the 12 o’clock position |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||