Как выбрать гостиницу для кошек
14 декабря, 2021
Tables D.22 and D.23 summarize the input data to the LOCA frequency calculation. Tables D.24 through D.26 give the results at T = 25, 40 and 60 years, respectively. Consistent with the LOCA frequency elicitation structure, Table D.27 is summary of mid values (MV, or 50th percentiles) at T = 25 years rather than mean values, however. Figure D.41 shows the time-dependent LOCA frequencies. Figure D.42 shows selected weld failure rates. Figures D.43 through D.46 show the contribution to LOCA frequency by respective Base Case. Note that Figure D.45 includes the contribution to LOCA frequency by PWR-1 (Reactor Coolant System Hot Legs; all 3 loops are accounted for in this figure) and PWR-2 (Pressurizer Surge Line). Note that the Base Case results used in Table 4.1 in the main body can be obtained from Tables D.16, D.17, and D.20 in this report.
Table D.22 Summary of Key BWR Base Case Input Data
|
Table D.23 Summary of Key PWR Base Case Input Data
|
Table D.24 Calculated LOCA Frequencies (T = 25 Years)
|
Table D.25 Calculated LOCA Frequencies (T = 40 Years)
|
Table D.26 Calculated LOCA Frequencies (T = 60 Years)
13 BWR-1 is the combination of RR Loop A and B. 14 N/A = not applicable. 15 The results are for FW Loop A and B. 16 The results are for 3-of-3 RC hot legs. 17 The results are for 2-of-2 HPI/NMU lines. |
Base Case |
Median (MV) LOCA Frequency [per Reactor-year] |
|||||
Flow Rate Threshold Value [gpm |
||||||
Cat1 V > 100 |
Cat2 V > 1,500 |
Cat3 V > 5,000 |
Cat4 V > 25,000 |
Cat5 V > 100,000 |
Cat6 V > 500,000 |
|
BWR-1 |
8.23E-06 |
1.08E-06 |
4.03E-07 |
1.29E-07 |
2.19E-08 |
N/A |
BWR-2 |
1.09E-06 |
1.35E-07 |
5.03E-08 |
1.65E-08 |
2.10E-09 |
N/A |
PWR-1 |
1.54E-07 |
2.25E-08 |
8.33E-09 |
2.85E-09 |
8.53E-10 |
1.58E-10 |
PWR-2 |
1.37E-08 |
1.39E-09 |
5.15E-10 |
1.54E-10 |
5.46E-11 |
N/A |
PWR-3 |
6.87E-06 |
1.15E-06 |
2.14E-07 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Years |
Figure D.41 Time-Dependent Cat 1 LOCA Frequencies
|
|
|
|
Figures D.48 (BWR) and D.49 (PWR) show the influence of in-service inspection on the time-dependent LOCA frequency; no ISI and ISI with POD = 0.5 and 0.9, respectively.
Figure D.48 Influence of ISI on Time-Dependent BWR-1 Cat 1 LOCA Frequency
Figure D.49 Influence of ISI on Time-Dependent PWR-1 Cat 1 LOCA Frequency