Как выбрать гостиницу для кошек
14 декабря, 2021
Throughout this report, pipe sizes are referenced by nominal pipe size (NPS), which indicates standard pipe size without an inch symbol. The smallest pipe size considered in this study is NPS3-% (Plant A. b). All references to specific material types are made according to designations by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). The term “weld failure” is used to indicate a rejectable (non-through-wall or through — wall) flaw.
During the NRC LOCA Elicitation Kick-off Meeting [D.1], a LOCA was defined as “a breach of the reactor coolant pressure boundary which results in a leak rate greater than 380 lpm (100 gpm).” Instead of using the traditional (or historical) LOCA size classes (small — medium — large) that are based on break size, this study uses LOCA sizes that are based on leak rate threshold values as indicated in Table D. 1 (adapted from [D. 1 ]) and Table D.2.
Table D.1 LOCA Size Classification Threshold Values
LOCA Category |
Flow Rate (v) Thresholds gpm (lpm) |
Comment |
0 |
v > 10 (38) |
Cat0 corresponds to a pressure boundary failure (breach) resulting in a leakage exceeding the T. S. limit for identified leakage. |
1 |
v > 100 (380) |
Breach in piping of up to 1.8-inch diameter (BWR), and 1.7-inch diameter (PWR); see Table D.3. |
2 |
v > 1,500 (5,700) |
Breach in piping of up to 3.3-inch diameter (BWR), and 3-inch diameter (PWR) |
3 |
v > 5,000 (19,000) |
Breach in piping of up to 7.3-inch diameter (BWR), and 6.8-inch diameter (PWR) |
4 |
v > 25,000 (95,000) |
Breach in piping of up to 18.4-inch diameter (BWR), and 14-inch diameter (PWR) |
5 |
v > 100,000 (380,000) |
Breach in NPS28 RR piping (BWR) yields on the order of 230,000 gpm. Breach in RCS hot leg piping of up to 31-inch diameter. |
6 |
v > 500,000 (1,900,000) |
Applies to PWR RCS-HL base case only, and only for a relatively short time following a postulated DEGB |
Table D.2 Estimated Flow Rates from Restrained Double-Ended Guillotine Break (DEGB)2 |
Pipe Size [NPS] |
Restrained DEGB (Plant A — PWR) |
Restrained DEGB (Plant B — BWR) |
||||
Break Size [sq. in.] |
Press. [psig] |
Max. Flow Rate [gpm] |
Break Size [sq. in.] |
Press. [psig] |
Max. Flow Rate [gpm] |
|
1 |
.41 |
2250 |
540 |
.41 |
1250 |
467 |
2 |
1.65 |
2250 |
2158 |
1.65 |
1250 |
1869 |
4 |
6.60 |
2250 |
8633 |
6.60 |
1250 |
7476 |
6 |
14.84 |
2250 |
19424 |
14.84 |
1250 |
16823 |
8 |
26.39 |
2250 |
32280 |
26.39 |
1250 |
29908 |
12 |
59.37 |
2250 |
72495 |
59.37 |
1250 |
42411 |
14 |
80.81 |
2250 |
98624 |
80.81 |
1250 |
57698 |
22 |
199.54 |
2250 |
243542 |
199.54 |
1250 |
142478 |
28 |
323.22 |
2250 |
394497 |
323.22 |
1250 |
230790 |
30 |
371.05 |
2250 |
452867 |
N/A |
— |
— |
2 Technical basis for leak rate calculation is documented in an attachment to Minutes of Meeting (2nd Elicitation Meeting), Bethesda (MD), June 4-5, 2003. |
The estimation of weld failure rates uses Bayesian reliability analysis methodology, and involves the development of prior and posterior failure rate distribution. In this study the term ‘prior’ refers to piping reliability characteristics before the implementation of industry programs to mitigate or eliminate susceptibilities to certain degradation mechanisms. The term ‘posterior’ refers to observed or expected reliability characteristics after reliability improvement actions have been implemented.