The analytical study should provide a systematic comparative assessment of the consequences (costs, benefits, impacts and risks) of alternative energy options (technologies). For decision-making purposes, these results need to be evaluated and presented in a coherent way. The evaluation and presentation of the results should focus on pointing out the main findings and conclusions that could support decision taking.

In order to assist decision makers effectively, analysts should present their results in a transparent manner (no "black boxes"), focusing on the verifiable results and their interpretations. In particular: input data and assumptions should be specified clearly and the boundaries and limits of the study should be indicated; comparison of alternatives should be based upon indicators that have been estimated quantitatively and qualitatively.

In general, the presentation of the results has to be adapted to the target audience of the study. The primary audience will be decision makers. However, in most cases, the study will also be disseminated to, and used by, interested and affected parties, e. g. local communities or NGOs. In both cases, the audience has not the same experience and knowledge on technical and economic issues as do the analysts. Therefore, results should be presented clearly and concisely, pointing out the main findings and outcomes.