Flow regimes

Many researchers have attempted the prediction of flow regimes in two-phase vertical flow. As yet, a much smaller group has examined flow regimes in cross-flow over tube bundles. Some of the first experiments were carried out by I. D.R. Grant (Collier, 1979) as it was the only available map at the time. Early studies in two-phase cross-flow used the Grant map to assist in identifying tube bundle flow regimes (Pettigrew et al., 1989) and (Taylor et al., 1989). More recently, Ulbrich & Mewes [180] performed a comprehensive analysis of available flow regime data resulting in a flow regime boundaries that cover a much larger
range of flow rates. They found that their new transition lines had an 86% agreement with available data. Their flow map is shown in Figure 21 by (Feenstra et al., 1990) with the flow regime boundary transitions in solid lines and the flow regimes identified with upper-case text. The dotted lines outline a previous flow regime map based on Freon-11 flow in a vertical tube from (Taitel et al., 1980).

Fig. 21. Flow regime map for vertically upward two-phase flow: From (Feenstra et al., 1986, Taitel et al., 1980). □ (Pettigrew et al., 1989), A (Axisa, 1985), V (Pettigrew et al., 1995), О (Feenstra et al., 1995).

Almost every study of flow regimes in tube bundles has concluded that three distinct flow regimes exist. In fact, several studies have shown that these regimes can easily be identified by measuring the probability density function (PDF) of the gas component of the flow (Ulbrich & Mewes, 1997), (Noghrehkar et al., 1995) and (Lian et al., 1997).