Bioproducts from thermochemical biorefineries

Researchers have developed detailed TEAs for several biofuels including hydrogen, methanol, ethanol, mixed alcohols, Fischer-Tropsch liquids, and naphtha and diesel range blend stock fuels (Wright and Brown, 2007a). Biofuel synthesis pathways can be categorized by the feedstock intermediate, subsequent upgrading process, and type of biofuel output. Feedstock intermediates are classified here as the primary products from biomass torrefaction, pyrolysis, and gasification. Upgrading processes are associated with specific intermediate products, although torrefied biomass and bio-oil can be converted into syngas and upgraded through alternative pathways. An overview of the main thermochemical biomass-to-liquid fuel pathways is shown in Fig. 2.1.

The syngas pathway leads to several types of biofuel products depending on the upgrading process: alcohol synthesis can output mostly methanol,

image012

2.1 Thermochemical biomass conversion pathway intermediates, upgrading processes, and final products.

ethanol, or mixed alcohols; methanol from alcohol synthesis can be further upgraded to gasoline and liquefied petroleum gas via the methanol-to — gasoline (MTG) process; steam reforming results in high hydrogen yields, and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis generates a mixture of hydrocarbons ranging from light gases to waxes (C1 ^ C120). Fischer-Tropsch liquids can substitute for diesel, but they have slightly different properties than conventional diesel. Therefore, some studies include a hydroprocessing unit to increase the output of naphtha — and diesel-range biofuels.

Capital costs vary significantly between different biofuel synthesis routes and plant configurations. Table 2.1 shows capital costs for biomass conversion to hydrogen, methanol, mixed alcohols, and Fischer-Tropsch liquids via syngas production and conversion. These capital costs have been re-categorized from the original analyses according to major process steps or sections. In general, pretreatment includes feedstock drying and grinding; gasification consists of the gasifier and auxiliary equipment; oxygen separation refers to the air separation island; gas cleaning includes particulate, tar, and impurity removal; syngas conditioning refers to water gas shift or reforming processes required for synthesis; synthesis/production is the main step to produce the desired fuel based on given specifications; steam and power generation, and utilities/miscellaneous group all auxiliary units required for the overall operation of the facility.

The selection of processes shown in Table 2.1 includes high and low temperature gasifiers; oxygen and air blown gasification systems; and steam and power export configurations. High temperature gasifiers tend to be more expensive due to strict metallurgy and operating constraints, but they deliver a higher quality syngas, which reduces gas cleaning and conditioning costs. Air blown gasifiers do not require air separation equipment, which is expensive, but they dilute syngas with nitrogen, which increases the size of downstream equipment. Excess heat and fuel gas are typically converted into steam and/or power depending on the quantity and quality available.

Biofuel costs include feedstock and operating costs in addition to annualized capital costs. Feedstock costs typically contribute between a quarter and more than half of the final biofuel cost because of high biomass costs. By-products, mostly heat and power, can sometimes contribute significant revenue.

Table 2.2 shows the annualized costs for selected biofuels via the syngas pathway. These costs illustrate some of the differences in assumptions found in the literature. Although the biorefinery capacities are similar, the annualized capital, operation and management, and biomass costs vary widely. Annual capital expenditures, including depreciation and capital charges, depend on the estimates described in Table 2.1 and several financial assumptions. Operation and management costs are typically based on local labor rates and factors for equipment maintenance. The differences in

Hydrogen (Hamelinck and Faaij, 2002)

Methanol (Hamelinck and Faaij, 2002)

Mixed alcohols (Phillips et at., 2007)

Fischer — Tropsch liquids (Tijmensen et al„ 2002)

Gasoline (Phillips et al„ 2011)

Naphtha and diesel via FTL (Swanson et al„ 2010)

Cost basis (year)

2001

2001

2007

2001

2007

2007

Capacity (dry metric

1920

1920

2000

1920

2000

2000

tonnes per day)

Capital costs ($MM)

Pretreatment

38.2

38.2

23.2

71.6

25.0

22.7

Gasification

73.0

30.4

12.9

61.4

14.6

67.8

Air separation

27.7

0

0

51.2

0

24.3

Syngas cleaning

12.4

38.1

14.5

61.4

44.3

33.5

Syngas conditioning

13.3

62.8

38.4

3.41

Synthesis/Production

53.3

41.3

27.8

20.5

21.6

49.4

Steam and power

64.8

13.9

16.8

61.4

23.1

45.6

generation

Utilities/Miscellaneous

3.6

10.2

5.9

33.1

Total installed

137

145

309

equipment cost

Total project investment

282

224

191

341

200

606

Operating costs ($MM)

Hydrogen (Hamelinck and Faaij, 2002)

Methanol (Hamelinck and Faaij, 2002)

Mixed

Alcohols

(Phillips

et al„ 2007)

Fischer — Tropsch liquids (Tijmensen et al„ 2002)

Gasoline (Phillips et al„ 2011)

Naphtha and diesel (Swanson et al„ 2010)

Capital

33.6

26.7

34.4

34.1

38.0

106.4

Operation and management

11.3

9.0

13.3

16.8

15.1

26.6

Biomass

24.7

24.9

27.0

34.2

39.1

51.3

By-product credit

-17.4

0.0

-12.8

0.0

0.0

-5.6

Total

52.1

60.6

61.9

50.8

92.2

178.7

Biofuel MFSPa($/gal)

$0.33

$0.52

$1.01

$1.89b

$1.39

$4.26

Biofuel MFSP ($/gge )

$1.26

$1.05

$1.54

$1.77

$1.39

$4.26

aMFSP: Minimum fuel selling price.

bAssumes 34.4MJ/L Fischer-Tropsch liquid energy density.

CGGE: gallon of gasoline equivalent (32.3 MJ/L gasoline energy density).

biomass costs are due to the wide range of assumed feedstock prices ($30—$75 per metric ton). Finally, we should note that these cost assessments involve assumptions for process maturity and projections for technology improvement that significantly impact the final estimates.

There are fewer techno-economic analyses for alternatives to the syngas thermochemical pathway, such as bio-oil upgrading and hydroprocessing of lipids. This is due in part to the commercial maturity of these processes. There has been little commercial adoption in the biomass industry of alternative processes such as biomass pyrolysis to bio-oil and hydrothermal processing to bio-crude despite being under development since the 1970s. However, with rising petroleum costs, there is renewed interest in processes that replace petroleum products beyond transportation fuels.

The following processes adopt alternative routes to producing transportation fuels with valuable co-products. Biomass pyrolysis produces primarily bio-oil, which can be upgraded to fuels. Pyrolysis co-products include biochar — a soil amendment and potential carbon sequestration agent, and chemicals. Extraction and hydrolysis of bio-oil recovers sugars (pentose and hexose) that can subsequently be fermented to ethanol. Biorefineries could obtain high valued chemicals benzene, toluene, ethylene, and propylene among other hydrocarbons from bio-oil via integrated catalytic processing (ICP) using a modified HZSM-5 catalyst. Syngas fermentation could produce polyhydroxyalkonate (PHA), a biodegradable polymer, while yielding excess hydrogen. Table 2.3 shows capital and operating costs for these alternative biorefineries.

A small number of ventures have commercialized the hydroprocessing of lipids to renewable diesel and jet fuels. Commercial lipid hydroprocessing employs by-products from the food industry such as vegetable oils, waste oils, and fats. Algal biomass has the potential to become the main feedstock

Table 2.3 Capital and operating costs for alternative biorefineries producing ethanol, PHA, and aromatics and olefins

Bio-oil

fermentation (So and Brown, 1999)

Syngas fermentation (Choi etal, 2010)

Bio-oil integrated catalytic processing (Brown et al., 2012)

Product

Ethanol

PHA

Aromatics and olefins

Co-product

Sugars

Hydrogen

Capacity (per year)

240 MM kg

6.5 MM kg

34.1 MM kg

Capital cost

$69

$103

$100

Operating cost

$39.2

$18.2

$74.5

Product cost

$1.59/gal

$2.80/kg

$2.18/kg

for lipid hydroprocessing if its production costs are drastically reduced (Roesijadi et al, 2010).