Biomass Harvesting and Logistics

Pierre Ackerman, Bruce Talbot, and Bo Dahlin

6.1 Introduction

As with conventional timber harvesting and transport, the selection of machine systems for biomass production is often based on local availability, traditional harvesting methods and systems and the innovative spirit of entrepreneurs. However, piecing together an optimal biomass harvesting and transport systems to fulfil sustainable biomass supply requires substantial knowledge and insight into and of the whole biomass supply chain. When considering the number of potential options available at any decision point in the chain, it becomes apparent that biomass supply chains are in fact unidirectional supply networks and not single or unique chains. The best employment of production factors represents the minimum cost flow through the network, from standing tree to boiler grate. Knowledge of the options available and the consequence of employing each of these is therefore important in plotting the best way forward through the network.

Biomass production networks are characterized by a number of state and form combinations. The required state or form of the biomass, e. g., Full-tree (FT — felled trees with branches and top intact), Tree-length (TL — trees felled, debranched and top removed), Cut-to-length (CTL — log assortments), and comminuted material,

P. Ackerman (H)

Department of Forest and Wood Science, Faculty of AgriSciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa e-mail: packer@sun. ac. za

B. Talbot

Forest Technology and Economics, Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute, As, Norway e-mail: bta@skogoglandskap. no

B. Dahlin

Department of Forest Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki,

Helsinki, Finland

e-mail: bo. dahlin@helsinki. fi

T. Seifert (ed.), Bioenergy from Wood: Sustainable Production in the Tropics, Managing Forest Ecosystems 26, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7448-3__6,

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 at each stage in the network (e. g., at stump, roadside landing, terminal, plant) determines, or is determined by, the production methods. Some of these can be directly linked in function and time, while others can be totally detached. A full year may pass between extraction and processing of stumps while in some cases hardwood trees can be felled, chipped and combusted on the same day.

Almost all final consumption plants, whether for combustion or as a raw material in further processing to; e. g., briquettes or pellets, requires biomass in a chipped or crushed form. This process of conversion is called comminution. A challenge for the operations manager is determining at what stage in the network comminution should happen. Every alternative has consequences for the choice of harvesting, extracting, processing and transport equipment. In the following overview, examples of a supply network in which comminution takes place at each cardinal point; in­field, at roadside, at a terminal, and at a conversion plant are provided. This chapter provides the reader with broad insight into making these comminution decisions through discussion of the positive and negative aspects at each of these cardinal points.

The proliferation of publications, trade fairs, seminars and internet sites (e. g., www. forestenergy. org) providing information on biomass production equipment and machinery, and the rapid technical developments that are being undertaken limit the relevance of a detailed technical description. In the following section, the working principles and intentions behind the main categories of equipment and machinery are presented and the reader is urged to keep abreast of developments through other media.