Efficient One-Pot Synthesis of 5-Chloromethylfurfural (CMF) from Carbohydrates in Mild Biphasic Systems

WENHUA GAO, YIQUN LI, ZHOUYANG XIANG, KEFU CHEN, RENDANG YANG, and DIMITRIS S. ARGYROPOULOS

8.1 INTRODUCTION

Locating new and versatile platform chemicals and biofuels from sustain­able resources to replace those derived from petrochemicals is a central ongoing and urgent task prompted by depleting fossil fuel reserves and growing global warming concerns [1-4]. Alternative fine chemicals and biofuels that have been suggested to address some of these issues are butanol [5], ethanol [5], dimethylfuran [1], 5-ethoxymethylfurfural [2], y-valerolactone, and alkanes produced from biomass [6,7]. Many of these alternatives rely on the efficient conversion of biomass carbohydrates into furfural derivatives. This is because biomass carbohydrates constitute 75% of the World’s renewable biomass and cellulose [4] and as such, they represent a promising alternative energy and sustainable chemical feed-

Efficient One-Pot Synthesis of 5-Chloromethylfurfural (CMF) from Carbohydrates in Mild Biphasic Systems. © Gao W, Li Y, Xiang Z, Chen K, Yang R, and Argyropoulos DS. Moleculres 18 (2013), doi:10.3390/moleculesl8077675. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Li­cense, http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/3.0/.

stock. In this regard, 5-halomethyfurfurals such as 5-chloromethylfurfural (CMF) and 5-bromomethylfurfural (BMF) has received significant atten­tion as platform chemicals for synthesizing a broad range of chemicals and liquid transportation fuels [8,9].

CMF and BMF are extremely reactive [9] so that when subjected to further chemistries the provide a variety of important compounds for fine chemicals, pharmaceuticals, furan-based polymers and biofuels. These compounds include hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) [9,10], 2,5-dimethyl — furan (DMF) [1], and 5-ethoxymethylfurfural (EMF) [2], and some bio­logically active compounds [11]. Among them, DMF and EMF stand out since they possess excellent properties, including high energy density, high boiling point and water stability. For these reasons, they have been promoted as novel biofuels. In particular, EMF has been the subject of considerable attention since it possesses an energy density of 8.7 kWhL-1, substantially higher than that of ethanol (6.1 kWhL-1), and comparable to that of standard gasoline (8.8 kWhL-1) and diesel fuel (9.7 kWhL-1) [12]. Although, CMF and BMF themselves are not biofuels, they could readily be converted into EMF biofuels in ethanol in nearly quantitative yields.

The conventional synthesis of CMF involves the treatment of HMF or cellulose with dry hydrogen halide. More specifically, the hydroxyl group in HMF undergoes a facile halogen substitution reaction. Examples in the literature include those of Sanda et al. who obtained CMF from the reac­tion of ethereal gaseous hydrogen chloride with HMF [13]. Furthermore, while the conversion of cellulose into CMF was low (12%) [14,15], a sub­stantially higher yield (48%) was obtained for the preparation of BMF when dry HBr was employed [16]. Considering the importance of these compounds, Mascal et al. recently reported the synthesis of CMF from cellulose treated by HCl-LiCl and successive continuous extraction [2]. Unfortunately, 5-(chloromethyl)furfural, 2-(2-hydroxyacetyl)furan, 5-(hy — droxylmethyl), furfural and levulinic acid were also produced with this system. More recently, Kumari et al. reported the preparation of BMF from cellulose by a modified procedure using HBr-LiBr involving continuous extraction [17]. Despite the numerous efforts aimed at these transforma­tions, each of them suffers from at least one of the following limitations: diverse by-products in significant yields that reduce the selectivity of the reaction and its economics, low conversions and yields, harsh reaction conditions (dry hydrogen halide, relative high temperature), requirements for large amounts of costly reagents (LiCl, LiBr), prolonged reaction times and tedious operations with complex set ups (continuous extraction) [18]. These drawbacks seriously hamper their potential industrial applications. Consequently, as part of our program aimed at developing new biofuels and fine chemicals based on biomass, we embarked our research for the development of efficient and economical methods aimed at converting carbohydrates to CMF under mild reaction conditions.

In this communication we demonstrate the use of the biphasic mixture HCl-H3PO4/CHCl3 for the one-pot conversion of carbohydrates into CMF. The rational for the use of this biphasic approach is based on the thinking that as CMF is generated from HMF it is immediately transported and ex­tracted from the aqueous acidic phase into the organic phase significantly minimizing by-product yields [9].

TABLE 1. The effect various reaction variables on CMF yields from D-fructose1.

Entry

HCl/H3PO4 (v/v)

Temperature (°C)

Time (h)

Yields (mol%)b

1

1/0

45

20

28.4

2

2/1

45

20

36.9

3

3/1

45

20

42.1

4

4/1

45

20

46.8

5

5/1

45

20

45.5

aD-fructose (5.0 mmol) was added in a mixture with specific volume ratio of 37% HCl and 85% HpO4 (5.0 mL), and CHC13 (5.0 mL). The system was stirred continuously at 45 °C for 20 h. bIsolatedyields based on D-fructose.