Insolation

Подпись: TABLE 4.1 Insolation at Various Latitudes for Clear Atmospheres0 Maximum Location Latitude W/m2 Btu/ft2-day Equator 0° 315 2400 Tropics 23.5° 341 2600 Mid-earth 45° 355 2700 Polar circle 65.5° 328 2500 ‘'Brinkworth (1973). Nearly total divided by 365.

The intensity of the incident solar radiation at the earth’s surface is one of the key factors in photosynthesis, as shown in Chapter 3. Except in a few rare cases, nat­ural biomass growth will not occur without solar energy. Isolation varies with ge­ographic location, time of day, and season of the year, and as is well known, it is high in the tropics and near the equator. The approximate changes of insolation with latitude are illustrated in Table 4.1 (Brinkworth, 1973), and Fig. 4.1 shows how the mean annual insolation varies at the earth’s surface with geographic location (Crutchfield, 1974). A more quantitative summary of average total daily insolation values over the continental United States is shown in Table 4.2 (U. S. Dept, of Commerce, 1970). At a given latitude, the incident radiation is not constant and often exhibits large changes over relatively short distances. Although several environmental factors influence biomass productivity, there is usually a relatively good correlation between the annual yields of dry biomass per unit area and the average insolation value (see Table 3.1). All other factors being equal, it is generally true that the higher the insolation, the higher the annual yield of a particular energy crop provided it is adapted to the local environment. C4 biomass species often exhibit higher productivities in terms

Minimum

Averageb

W/m2

Btu/ft2-day

W/m;

! Btu/ft2-day

236

1800

263

2000

171

1300

263

2000

70.9

540

210

1600

0

0

158

1200

image065

180

180

TABLE 4.2 Average Daily Insolation for Selected U. S. Cities’1

January October

Location

(W/m2)

April (W/m2)

July (W/m2)

(W/m2)

Annual (V

Arizona—Tucson

146

289

288

208

229

California—Fresno

93

290

338

187

229

Florida—Lakeland

135

260

247

189

210

Indiana—Indianapolis

90

188

242

120

157

Louisiana—Lake Charles

109

215

236

175

191

Minnesota—St. Cloud

76

178

275

104

157

Montana—Glasgow

72

190

299

118

175

Nevada—Ely

108

257

288

176

210

Oklahoma—Oklahoma City

81

212

264

155

183

Texas—San Antonio

113

198

286

182

199

Vermont—Burlington

76

182

208

100

146

Virginia—Sterling

91

173

233

113

159

Washington—Seattle

37

179

276

98

151

“U. S. Dept, of Commerce (1970).

of growth rates and annual yields because of their capability to utilize incident solar radiation at higher efficiencies for photosynthesis.