Как выбрать гостиницу для кошек
14 декабря, 2021
Moridis and Reagan [131] showed that depressurization-induced dissociation appears to be the most promising gas production strategy in Class 2 deposits. They proposed new well configurations to maximize production and alleviate a persistent problem of substantial secondary hydrate (or ice) formation in a narrow zone (r < 10 m) around the well. Using the properties and conditions representative of the Tigershark formation and producing at an initial constant mass rate of QM = 19.2 kg/s (=10,000 BPD), Moridis and Reagan [131] showed (Fig. 13) that (a) QM cannot be
Fig. 11 Gas production from a class 1 hydrate deposit. Left: evolution of (a) the rate of CH4 release from hydrate dissociation, (b) the rate of CH4 production at the well, and (c) the corresponding rate replenishment ratio over the 30-year production period. Right: evolution of (a) the cumulative CH4 volume released from hydrate dissociation, (b) the produced CH4 volume at the well, and (c) the corresponding volume replenishment ratio over the 30-year production period [129]
Fig. 13 Rates of (a) hydrate-originating CH4 release in the reservoir (QR) and (b) CH4 production at the well (QP) during production from a class 2 oceanic hydrate deposit. Several production stages and the average production rate (Q ) over the simulation period (5,660 days) are also shown [131] |
maintained constant during the production period (but has to decline), (b) the gas production rate is highly variable, (c) it is encumbered by a long initial lead time during which little gas is produced, but (d) it can reach levels as high as QP=4.8 x 105 m3/day (=17 MMSCFD), with an average gas production Qav over the 5,660-day period of simulation is about 2.2 x 105 m3/day (=7.8 MMSCFD). This study showed very high recovery from hydrate deposits, although economic and geomechanical considerations may limit total recovery. Similar results were obtained from the study of an oceanic Class 2 deposit in the Ulleung Basin of the Korean East Sea [136] and (b) a permafrost-associated deposit in the North slope [133, 134], leading to the observation that QP on the order of several MMSCFD is attainable in Class 2 deposits despite significant differences in reservoir temperature, HBS thickness, and salinity.
The use of horizontal wells can substantially improve gas production from such deposits and reduce the initial period of low QP [137]. Conversely, Moridis and Kowalsky [128] determined that QP was too low to justify considering such accumulations as viable targets in the presence of permeable boundaries and/or with a deep WZ.
Fig. 14 Pressure-temperature equilibrium relationship in the phase diagram of the water-CH4 hydrate system [123]. The two arrows show the direction of increasing thermodynamic desirability of a deposit as a production target. Lw liquid water; H hydrate; V vapor (gas phase); I ice; Q} quadruple point = I+Lw+H + V |