Anaerobic Digestion of Algae

Production of biogas from seaweeds and microalgae by AD was a subject of research starting in the mid-sixties [109, 110]. The first detailed large-scale study of seaweed cultivation and AD was performed in the Institute of Gas Technology by Chynoweth et al. [79, 111]. Substrate chemical composition and conversion parameters deter­mine the amount and composition of biogas generated in the ADP. The theoretical yield of biogas can be estimated by the Bushwell equation [112].

CcHhOoNn + yH2O ^ xCH4 + nNH3 + (c — x)CO2

where:

x = (4c + h — 2o — 3n — 2s) / 8
y = (4c — h — 2o + 3n + 3s) / 4

The theoretical methane yield from different algae is presented in Table 15.

Lipids have the lowest oxidation state and largest theoretical methane yield, which is more than twice the methane yield from proteins, glycerol, and carbohydrates. The theoretical methane yield correlates with the average carbon oxidation state of the substrate (Fig. 2) . Macroalgae with high carbohydrate content and cyanobacteria with high protein content are theoretically poorer feedstock for methane produc­tion while microalgae with high lipid content have higher potential methane yield.

Feedstock

Chemical formula

Average carbon oxidation state

Mole ratio C/N

Theoretical yield CH4 (L/gVS)

NH3 (mg/gVS)

CH4 (%)

References

Lipids

c5AA

-1.296

0.97

66.2

C. pyrenoidosa (oily)

А. Аоз. Азл*

-1.29

57.2

0.84

16.8

66.1

[506]

Scenedesmus sp.

AAAAAvS

-0.760

7.38

0.64

110.3

59.5

[594]

ChloreUa sp.

CHONS

AS7,3П543.7 А20іN33.2°

-0.71

8.65

0.59

88.5

58.9

[436]

M. pyrifera

-0.261

17.4

0.50

41.0

55.3

[79]

Anabaenopsis sp.

ААзлА. зз*

-0.223

7.94

0.49

88.4

52.8

[506]

ChloreUa sp. (lipids depleted residues)

CHONS

^ 121.8П217.3^ 66.6і N 21.8°

-0.154

5.59

0.47

121.4

51.9

[436]

Chlamydomonas sp.

АА. ГзАо^

-0.148

9.52

0.46

70.6

51.9

[506]

S. bacillaris

-0.030

6.16

0.46

112.6

50.6

Proteins

Ci3h25o7n3s

-0.154

3.17

0.45

152.2

51.9

Laminaria sp.

С H О N S

А3.4П150.7 A52.7iN 5.5°

-0.095

16.81

0.45

39.9

39.9

[593]

C. pyrenoidosa

с, Ао. АА

-0.010

6.20

0.45

109.2

50.1

[506]

M. pyrifera

AA^AA

-0.088

8.13

0.44

80.2

51.1

[79]

S. fluitans

A8A. A„,n

-0.014

28.77

0.44

23.07

50.2

[121]

G. verrucosa

c,48A. A,A

0.057

8.48

0.44

80.2

49.3

A. maxima

AA. AAAA

0.007

5.51

0.43

119.7

49.9

[594]

Glycerol

c3h8o3

-0.667

0.43

58.3

G. tikvahiae

C8.22H17.21°6.23N

-0.214

8.22

0.42

74.1

52.7

[121]

S. pteropleuron

ААз. АА

0.067

58.93

0.42

10.9

49.2

Ulva sp.

A A A-A..s

0.044

10.68

0.42

60.6

49.5

[506]

A. nodosum

CAO№

-0.038

11.69

0.42

54.2

50.5

[531]

M. pyrifera

СШЗ. А8,А, Аз,8

-0.034

28.61

0.41

21.4

50.5

F. vesiculosus

CHONS

A1.6n-68.9W30.8iN3.32O

0.061

12.54

0.41

51.0

49.2

Carbohydrates

(CSH, A)

v 6 10 5’n

0.00

0.41

50.0

Table 15 Theoretical methane yield from different algal species and biochemical compounds

894 P. Bohutskyi and E. Bouwer

Fig. 2 (a) Theoretical methane yield in relation to the average carbon oxidation state. circles— pure compounds; crosses—microalgae; pluses—macroalgae. (b) Mean theoretical methane yield and (c) C/N ratio with maximum and minimum values (base on Table 15)

Based on this observation, increasing the lipid content in algae is a promising approach for enhancing the methane yield. Another observation is that all microalgae have C/N ratio lower than optimal range for AD and high potential level for ammonia release. In contrast, several macroalgae and oil rich microalgae have a C/N ratio that is too high and possibly require addition of nitrogen for optimal AD conditions.