Microbial biomass application in animal food industry

The cost of diets in several animal cultures is predominantly due to the cost of protein component [75]. In the case of aquaculture, its massive expansion in the last decades has begun to face some important limitations like increasing prices of fishmeal, a raw material prime component of aquaculture diets. However, pressure caused in natural stocks (over­fishing) has depleted fishmeal production and, as a consequence, continuous increase in prices has been observed [76]. Moreover, growth of aquafeed industry (driven by an increase in fish/shrimp demand as the global population continues to growth), the competition with other animal cultures (such as swine and poultry) and differences in fishmeal quality also collaborated with increase in prices of fishmeal. The quality attributed to fishmeal includes high palatability, high content of digestible protein, highly unsaturated fatty acids (HUFA) and minerals.

In this context, alternatives should be evaluated opposing this non-optimism scenario. Aquaculture industry needs to investigate alternative source of proteins to replace less sustainable ones. Candidates of protein sources might have good digestibility, palatability, energy content, low ash content and present a well-balanced essential amino acids profile (EAA) [77].

In the past years, BFT has been emerged not only as promising alternative to grow-out system, but also as a method to obtain protein for compounds diets originated from its diverse microbiota. Collected in tanks/ponds [46, 62] or produced in bioreactors [17, 39, 67] biofloc (Fig 8) is a raw material to produce "biofloc meal". In bioreactors, biofloc production can clean up effluent waters from aquaculture facilities, converting dissolved nutrients into single-cell protein [78]. Usually, two types of bioreactors have been employed: sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) and membrane batch reactors (MBRs), both controlling ammonia, nitrite and suspended solids with great efficacy (for review of bioreactors and its employ, see Kuhn et al 2012). Moreover, excess of solids removed from culture tanks or ponds and/or concentrated into solid removal devices [28] could also be a recyclable source of biofloc for biofloc meal production. This sustainable approach of protein source is getting more attention in the aquaculture industry. The microbial particles can provide important nutrients such as protein [33, 46], lipids [10, 37], aminoacids [80] and fatty acids [33, 67, 81].

Biofloc meal (also called "single-celled" protein), added to compounded feed is currently focus of intensive research in nutrition fields [17, 78]. However, to produce this protein ingredient some processes are required such as drying, milling and storage. In this context, nutritional characteristics could be affected (by i. e. temperature during drying), which the "native" properties could be altered.

Nutritional composition of biofloc differs according to environmental condition, carbon source applied, TSS level, salinity, stocking density, light intensity, phytoplankton and bacteria communities and ratio, etc. Regarding to age of bioflocs, in "young" biofloc heterotrophic bacteria is mainly presented as compared to "old" biofloc dominated by fungi [79]. In biofloc particles, protein, lipid and ash content could vary substantially (12 to 49, 0.5 to 12.5 and 13 to 46%, respectively; Table 2). The same trend occurs with fatty acids (FA) profile. Essential FA such as linoleic acid (C18:2 n-6 or LA), linolenic acid (C18:3 n-3 or ALA), arachidonic acid (C20:4 n-6 or ARA), eicosapentanoic acid (C20:5 n-3 or EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (C22:6 n-3 or DHA), as well as sum of n-3 and sum of n-6 differ considerably between 1.5 to 28.2, 0.04 to 3.3, 0.06 to 3.55, 0.05 to 0.5, 0.05 to 0.77, 0.4 to 4.4 and 2.0 to 27.0% of total FA. Type of carbon source, freshwater or marine water and production of biofloc biomass (in bioreactors or culture tanks) definitely influence the FA profile (Table 3 and 4). Vitamin and amino acids profile from biofloc produced in large-scale commercial bioreactors [82] in given in Table 5.

image147

Figure 8. Biofloc particle (10x magnification) (Source: [54])

Information is still scarce about how microorganisms profile and its nutritional composition could impact animal growth. However, is already known that microorganisms in biofloc might partially replace protein content in shrimp diets, although were not always the case [10, 88]. Recent studies determined how reducing the protein content of diet would affect growth performance of shrimp reared in biofloc conditions. In the study [15] was found that at least 10% of protein content in pelletized feed can be reduced when F. paulensis postlarvae are raised in BFT conditions. In [89] was observed that shrimp fed with less than 25% crude protein under biofloc conditions performed similarly to shrimp raised under regular clear­water intensive culture with a 37%-protein diet. The biofloc system also delivered more consistent survival rates, especially at higher density. A low-protein biofloc meal-based pellet (25% CP) was evaluated as a replacement of conventional high-protein fishmeal diet (40% CP) for L. vannamei in a relatively low temperature (25oC) under biofloc conditions

[35] . The results showed that is possible to replace 1/3 part of a conventional diet by alternative low-protein biofloc meal pellet without interfering survival and shrimp performance.

Crude protein (%)

Carbohydrates (%)

Lipids (%)

Crude fiber (%)

Ash (%)

Reference

43.0

12.5

26.5

[27]

31.2

2.6

28.2

[83]

12.0 — 42.0

2.0 — 8.0

22.0 — 46.0

[84]

31.1

23.6

0.5

44.8

[10]

26.0 — 41.9

1.2 — 2.3

18.3 — 40.7

[80]

30.4

1.9

12.4*

38.9

[85]

49.0

36.4

1.13

12.6

13.4

[17]

38.8

25.3

<0.1

16.2

24.7

[78]

28.8 — 43.1

2.1 — 3.6

8.7 — 10.4

22.1 — 42.9

[86]

30.4

29.1

0.5

0.8

39.2

[37]

18.2-29.3

22.8-29.9

0.4-0.7

1.5-3.5

43.7-51.8

[47]

18.4-26.3

20.2-35.7

0.3-0.7

2.1-3.4

34.5-41.5

[87]

28.0-30.4

18.1-22.7

0.5-0.6

3.1-3.2

35.8-39.6

[62]

*Lignin+cellulose

Table 2. Proximate analysis of biofloc particles in different studies.

Also, recent studies have been demonstrated that fishmeal in shrimp diets can be partially replaced by other protein sources under biofloc conditions or by biofloc meal. In [90] was evaluated two fishmeal replacement levels (40 and 100% of replacement) by other ingredients (soyabean meal and viscera meals) in diets for Litopenaeus vannamei reared in a biofloc system. The authors observed that fishmeal can be replaced in a level of 40.0% without interfering on growth performance and water quality. On the other hand, incorporating treated solids (microbial flocs) generated from tilapia effluent into shrimp feed, [91] demonstrated that shrimp performance was significantly increased as compared to untreated solids (settling basins of tilapia culture units). In [92] a trial performed in clear­water conditions detected that fishmeal can be completely replaced with soy protein concentrate and biofloc meal (obtained from super-intensive shrimp farm effluent) in 38% CP diets without adverse effects on L. vannamei performance. Moreover, [17] observed that biofloc produced in SBRs bioreactors using tilapia effluent and sugar as a growth media could offer an alternative protein source to shrimp feeds. Microbial floc-based diets significantly outperformed control fishmeal-based diets in terms of weight gain per week with no differences in survival.

Regarding to biofloc meal production, one bottleneck seems to be the large amount of wet biofloc biomass required to produce 1kg of dry biofloc meal. Estimative indicates that biofloc plug in 1L settling cones contained only 1.4% of dry matter [14]. The reference [17] indicated that 1 kg of microbial floc could be produced per 1.49 kg of sucrose in bioreactors. Certainly more research is needed on this field. On the other hand, other applications of

biofloc meal in animal industry should be evaluated, mainly considering its nutritional profile and relatively low costs as compared to other protein sources (i. e. fishmeal) [17]. In aquaculture, biofloc meal could be included into broodstock pelletized feed, prior or after eyestalk ablation. Further research is encouraged in this field.

Fatty Acid

% of total fatty acid

C14:0

0.10

0.60

0.80

0.45

1.43

0.69

0.61

0.43

C15:0

0.15

0.25

0.25

0.30

0.31

0.31

0.17

0.26

C16:0

2.2

17.0

26.0

15.0

6.06

8.01

6.34

8.86

C16:1

4.0

3.7

3.0

5.0

6.61

2.61

1.61

1.54

C17:0

0.05

0.4

0.5

0.2

0.20

0.23

0.14

0.68

C18:0

0.5

4.0

7.1

6.0

2.37

4.82

3.94

6.27

C18:1 n-7

1.5

3.0

1.9

2.7

3.96

1.72

2.71

4.19

C18:1 n-9

1.8

19.0

30.0

18.0

3.34

7.26

8.12

12.05

C18:2 n-6 (LA)

5.0

19.0

28.2

11.0

1.91

17.24

11.95

21.87

C18:3 n-3 (ALA)

0.04

0.5

0.45

2.0

0.23

0.99

0.20

0.21

C20:0

0.10

0.20

0.20

0.06

0.34

0.33

0.49

C20:1 n-9

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.10

0.25

0.20

0.06

0.02

C20:3 n-6

0.15

0.10

0.06

0.07

0.55

0.36

0.15

0.04

C20:4 n-6 (ARA)

0.7

0.3

0.15

0.20

0.77

0.87

0.17

0.06

C20:5 n-3 (EPA)

0.10

0.11

0.05

0.25

0.15

0.15

0.19

0.12

C22:6 n-3 (DHA)

0.05

0.07

0.05

0.18

0.06

0.18

0.10

I Saturated

22.08

22.99

35.35

22.45

10.76

14.85

11.53

16.99

I

Monounsaturated

8.16

26.22

35.45

27.15

16.51

14.21

12.5

17.8

I n-3

0.4

0.6

0.7

0.65

1.04

2.02

0.60

0.43

I n-6

7.0

20.0

27.0

12.0

4.03

19.03

12.27

21.97

Type of water

freshwatei

freshwater

freshwater

freshwater

freshwater

freshwater

marine

marine

Carbon source

Acetate

Glycerol

(Glycerols

Bacillus)

Glucose

Glucose

Glycerol

Glucose

Glycerol

Collection

bioreactors

bioreactors

bioreactors

bioreactors

bioreactors

bioreactors

bioreactors

bioreactors

Reference

[39]

[67]

Table 3. Fatty acid profile of biofloc (produced in experimental bioreactors) using different carbon source in marine water and freshwater

Fatty Acid

% of total fatty acid

C14:0

2.02-2.48

13.8-16.1

5.4-6.2

C15:0

0.70-0.77

1.1-1.5

1.1-1.3

C16:0

17.88-19.10

45.4-53.5

48.7-49.3

C16:1

7.15-7.74

9.9-15.3

16.5-21.6

C17:0

0.7

0.9-1.0

C18:0

6.24-7.27

3.4-3.5

3.7-4.5

C18:1 n-7

11.05-11.28

C18:1 n-9

8.51-10.08

8.8-9.2

7.7-10.8

C18:2 n-6 9 (LA)

15.38-16.68

1.5-2.5

2.2-2.6

C18:3 n-3 (ALA)

0.65-0.73

2.0-2.3

2.2-3.3

C20:0

0.87-1.44

0.2-0.4

0.4

C20:1 n-9

0.74-0.80

0.3-0.4

0.5

C20:3 n-6

0.40-0.46

0.2

0.2

C20:4 n-6 (ARA)

3.11-3.55

0.3-0.4

0.3-0.4

C20:5 n-3 (EPA)

0.39-0.46

0.3-0.5

0.5

C22:6 n-3 (DHA)

0.74-0.77

0.2-0.4

0.3-0.4

Y Saturated

30.2-34.92

67.6-73.0

61.5-61.9

Y Monounsaturated

28.10-29-38

19.7-25.0

28.3-30.5

Y n-3

1.38-1.91

2.8-3.4

3.2-4.4

Y n-6

23.5-25.81

2.0-3.0

2.7-3.1

Type of water

freshwater

marine

marine

Carbon source

Wheat flour

molasses

molasses

Collection

Tilapia tanks

shrimp tanks

shrimp tanks

Reference

[33]

[87]

[62]

Table 4. Fatty acid profile of biofloc (collected in tanks) using different carbon source in marine water and freshwater

Amino Acids

As Fed(%)

Alanine

3.82

Arginine

3.60

Aspartic acid

6.36

Glutamic acid

8.04

Glycine

2.81

Histidine

1.46

Isoleucine

3.38

Leucine

5.06

Lysine

4.34

Methionine

1.41

Cysteine

0.55

Phenylalanine

3.29

Proline

2.77

Serine

2.82

Taurine

0.25

Threonine

3.11

Tryptophan

0.98

Tyrosine

2.83

Valine

3.52

Total

60.4

Vitamins

Niacin

83.3 mg/kg

Thiamine B1

7.7 mg/kg

Riboflavin

39.0 mg/kg

Vitamin B12

12.0 mg/kg

Vitamin E

29.8 IU/kg

Table 5. Example of vitamin and amino acids profile from biofloc produced in large-scale commercial bioreactors [82].