Decarboxylation

Bio-oil contains considerable amounts of acids such as acetic, formic, and butyric acid, resulting in low pH values (c. a. pH 2-3). The presence of these acids creates various practical challenges for bio-oil applications. Highly corrosive nature makes bio-oil not suitable for applications with metals and rubber. Further, the presence of acids would increase O/C ratio and make bio-oil more reactive. Accordingly, it is critical to develop chemistries that can deal with carboxylic acids when upgrading bio-oil. Decarboxylation refers to the removal of oxygen in the form of CO2 from a carboxylated compound and can be given in a general equation as follows (eq.(2) ):

RCO2H — RH + CO2 (2)

Insights on effective catalysts for removing oxygen in carboxylic acids can be obtained from studies on decarboxylation of model systems that include stearic, palmetic, benzoic, and heptanoic acids. Equations (3) and (4) depict the thermodynamic favorability of the decarboxylation reactions. The negative values for AG° implies that the decarboxylation reactions of acetic and benzoic acids have a significant activation energy barrier to overcome[44].

CH3CO2H — s

► CH4 + CO2

AGo =

— 68.5 kJ / mol

(3)

C6H5CO2H-

— C6H6 + CO2

II

О

%

— 54.3 kJ / mol

(4)

Biodiesel research is an important area to look for information related to decarboxylation. Fatty acids and fatty acid methyl esters from biodiesel industry have been subjected further deoxygenation with the intension of obtaining higher quality liquid fuels [45, 46]. In one such study, Pd has been identified to be an active metal for decarboxylation of fatty acids present in plant oil. In this study, the ability to convert heptanoic acid to octane was investigated using Pd/SiO2 and Ni/АЬОз catalysts [47-50]. It was reported that 98% acid conversion was obtained with Pd/SiO2 at 330oC but only 64% was reported by Ni/АЬОз [44].

Pd supported on active carbon has also been tested as the catalyst for decarboxylation of stearic acid at 300oC. The results indicated that the reaction was selective toward n — heptadecane [47]. Further, they claimed that conducting the reaction in the presence of hydrogen increased the rate of decarboxylation. А comparative study performed with thermal and catalytic deoxygenation of stearic acid further proved that catalytic deoxygenation is highly selective toward hydrocarbons. In this study, 5%Pd supported on mesoporous silica, SBA-15, MCM-41and zeolyte-Y has been used as the catalyst. It was reported that SBA-15 had a selectivity of 67% for n-pentadecane [48]. The study further revealed that the deoxygenation activity reduces in the order as SBA -15 > MCM-41 > zeolite-Y.

In an analogous study, pure palmitic acid, stearic acid, and a mixture of 59% of palmitic and 40% of stearic acid was deoxygenated over 4 % Pd/C catalyst at 300 oC and 5% H2 in argon at 17 bar of pressure. The conversion of the catalyst was reported to be over 94% after 180 min of the reaction time with a selectivity of 99% [51]. The kinetic behavior of decarboxylation of ethyl stearate over Pd / C has been investigated with the aim to verify the reaction mechanism. As shown in figure (9), decarboxylation of ethyl stearate proceeded through fatty acid decarboxylation to the desired и-heptadecane. The produced paraffin simultaneously dehydrogenated to unsaturated olefins and aromatics. A kinetic model has been developed based on the proposed reaction network in figure (9) using Langmuir — Hinshelwood mechanism with the assumptions that the surface reaction is rate limiting and the adsorption reaction is rapid compared to surface reaction [52]. The rate equation for the proposed reaction scheme can be represented in a simplified form as shown in eq.(5). According to the rate information, step 6 in figure (9) can be considered as the rate limiting step with the rate constant of 1.45×10-12/min. Both decarboxylation steps which were represented in step 4 and 5 is shown to be the fastest steps in the scheme.

ki •C (5)

Ti-7—————

1+ Z Ki • Ci

(ri: reaction rate, ki: lumped reaction rate, Ci: concentration, Ki: equilibrium constant )

image135

Aromatic C17 compunds

Figure 9. Decarboxylation of elthyl stearate ( Information was adapted from Snare et al.[52])

HZSM-5 can be considered as a versatile catalyst that has the ability to do both dehydration and decarboxylation. For example, decarboxylation of methyl esters to hydrocarbon fuels has been studied using methyl octonoate (MO) on HZSM-5 [53]. The catalyst showed strong signs of MO adsorption on to the catalyst surface. This reaction produced significant amounts of C1-C7 hydrocarbon compounds and aromatics. Formation of octonic acid as a primary product indicates that acidic hydrolysis reaction has taken place. However, it was noted that these primary products further undergo conversion into aromatic compounds. The proposed reaction scheme for the MO conversion is presented in figure (10).

image136

Direct Cyclization

Figure 10. A possible reaction pathway for the deoxygenation of methyl octonoate ( Information was adapted from Danuthai et al. [53] ).

Rather than complete removal, partial removal of oxygen to aldehydes or ketones would also be useful during upgrading since the latter product(s) can go through HDO pathway relatively easily. Various studies have been conducted in this regard and many have used benzoic acid as the model compound [54-58]. In such a study, different weak base catalysts such as MnO2, CeO2, MgO, ZnO, Fe2O3, K2O supported on SiO2, AhO3, TiO2 have been tested for upgrading the acid-rich phase of bio-oil through ketonic condensation. The study further evaluated the effect of the presence of water on ketonic condensation of three model components, phenol, p-methoxyphenol, and furfural (typically seen in bio-oil). They reported that CeO2 on Al2O3 and TiO2 had better catalytic activity and tolerance to water. Although the presence of water and phenol did not have a significant impact on the ketonic condensation of acetic acid, the presence of furfural exhibited a strong inhibitory effect on the reaction [54].

Recent studies reported that the best catalysts for the conversion of carboxylic acids to aldehyde /alcohol(s) were Al2O3, SiO2, TiO2 or MgO supported transition/noble metals such as Pt, Pd, Cu, or Ru. For example, in deoxygenation of methyl stearate and methyl octanoate over alumina-supported Pt [59], 1% Pt/y-AhO3 reported to be highly active and selective toward deoxygenation. They reported that 1% Pt/TiO2 displayed a higher Q hydrocarbon selectivity than 1% Pt/AhO3. This was attributed to the presence of larger oxygen vacancies on the TiO2 support [59]. Results of a similar screening study for the decarboxylation of stearic acid are depicted in the figure (11). It is apparent that Pd, Pt on activated carbon and 5% Ru on MgO resulted in the highest conversion of stearic acids to hydrocarbons.

image137

Figure 11. Conversion of stearic acid on different catalysts ( Information was adapted from Snare et al. [45].)