Dehydration

Bio-oil has significant amounts of — OH groups in its components that require dehydration, i. e., removal of oxygen in the form of water, to make hydrocarbons. Dehydration occurs even during HDO process but what is considered here is the spontaneous removal of oxygen as water in the absence of extraneous H2.

Studies on dehydration as a method to produce motor fuel initiated several decades ago. With the advent of new catalysts, this area grew into new heights. A wide range of studies have been carried out with oxygenates ranging from simple methanol, to polyols like glycerol. The presence of light-molecular-weight alcohols such as methanol and ethanol in bio-oil is less common while phenolic compounds and polyols can be considered to be more abundant. However, studies on light alcohols give good insights into the chemistry and will be discussed in more detail below.

Dehydration of methanol to produce gasoline products such as benzene, toluene and xylene has been reported by different research groups [31-35]. In this regard, different heterogeneous catalysts have been studied. In particular, the molecular sieve ZSM-5 has received great attention for dehydration reactions. It has been widely accepted that Bronsted acid sites of the ZSM-5 catalyst play a crucial role for the dehydration reaction. Acid sites donates protons to the hydroxyl group of the oxygenate as shown in figure (7) to form water instigating dehydration.

Addition of metal oxides onto the catalyst framework was reported to increase the acidity of the support material. As a result, this would enhance dehydration reactions in turn facilitating the formation of higher molecular weight hydrocarbons. For example, methanol conversion to gasoline range hydrocarbons over metal oxides (such as ZnO and CuO) supported on HZSM-5 at temperature 400 OC and 1 atm pressure was reported [36]. The results indicate that pure HZSM-5 produced the lowest yields compared to metal-oxide — promoted catalyst such as CuO/ HZSM-5, CuO /ZnO/HZSM-5, ZnO/HZSM-5. The presence of CuO significantly increased the yields of aromatics. It was further concluded that addition of ZnO over CuO significantly reduced the catalyst deactivation potential [36]. Studies conducted to find the effect of different CuO loadings on methanol conversion indicate that the highest conversion of 97% was obtained when the CuO loading was at 7%. It was observed that further increase of oxide loading decreased methanol conversion. This behavior was attributed to loss of acid sites on the support. A subsequent catalyst deactivation study indicated that the catalyst deactivation increased with the increase in CuO loading. It was concluded that the deactivation of the catalyst occurred mainly due to
the deposition of large molecular weight hydrocarbons known as coke blocking the catalyst pores[37].

Dehydration of ethanol has also been studied extensively with other catalysts. A study of the effect of different additives such as ZnO, Ga2O3, Mo2C and Re, on ZSM-5 on deoxygenation of alcohols has provided new insights on renewable aromatic hydrocarbons production [38]. The product selectivities for different catalysts are depicted in figure (8). It is clear that Ga2O3 performed better in terms of selectivity toward benzene, toluene and xylenes found in gasoline.

Ethanol dehydration has been further studied in order to make ethylene as the precursor to make ethyl-tetra-butyl-ether (ETBE) [39, 40]. Ethers have gained much attention as a substitute for petroleum diesel. A study on ethanol dehydration to ethylene over dealuminated modernite (DM) and metals such as Zn, Mn, Co, Rh, Ni, Fe and Ag loaded DM has shown that Zn/DM and Zn/Ag/DM gives the highest selectivity to ethylene formation [40]. This indicates that incorporation of single metal or metal combinations onto dealuminated modernite makes the catalyst more selective toward ethylene production. Further, the results suggest that such combinations of metal and support would lower coke formation as high molecular weight compounds were not produced significantly.

Подпись: Experiment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

(a)

Experiment No:

Catalyst used

Reaction Temperature — K

1

ZSM-5(80)

773

2

ZSM-5(80)

873

3

ZSM-5(280)

773

4

ZSM-5(280)

873

5

2% Mo2C/ZSM-5(80)

773

6

2% Mo2C/ZSM-5(80)

873

7

2% Mo2C/ZSM-5(280)

773

8

2% Mo2C/ZSM-5(280)

873

9

2% Re/ZSM-5(80)

773

10

2% Re/ZSM-5(80)

873

11

2% Ga2O3/ZSM-5(80)

773

12

2% Ga2O3/ZSM-5(80)

873

13

2% ZnO/ZSM-5(80)

773

14

2% ZnO/ZSM-5(80)

873

15

ZSM-5(80) + 2% Mo2C/ZSM-5(80)

773

16

ZSM-5(80) + 2% Mo2C/ZSM-5(80)

873

17

ZSM-5(80) + 2% Ga2O3/ZSM-5(80)

773

18

ZSM-5(80) + 2% Ga2O3/ZSM-5(80)

873

19

ZSM-5(80) + 2% ZnO/ZSM-5(80)

773

20

ZSM-5(80) + 2% ZnO/ZSM-5(80)

873

Figure 8. (a) Selectivity towards different products from ethanol dehydration. (b) The catalysts and respective reaction conditions for each reaction.(Prepared with data from Barthos et al.[38])

(b)

There has been some studies on phenol dehydration [41, 42]. In once such study where HZSM-5 was used it has been observed that the reactivity of phenol and 2-methoxyphenol has been very low and that the catalyst had a greater tendency to form coke [42]. The rate of deactivation of the catalyst by coke formation reduced with increased water formation. In a separate study, lignin derivative guaiacol was attempted to be transformed to phenol at a temperature of 350 oC and 1atm pressure. In this study, first row transition metals (V to Zn) supported on alumina was tested [43]. Results indicate that vanadium oxide on alumina
gave the highest yield of phenol. They concluded that vanadium, as an early transition metal, has the oxophilic property and had helped the efficient removal of oxygen from guaiacol in the form of water. Nevertheless, water formed during dehydration has a tendency to adsorb onto acid sites dramatic decreasing the catalyst activity.