To evaluate seven rotational crops

The changes in soil properties were relatively small as should be expected with only one rotation. The rotational crops can contribute with organic residues, but, in general, the amounts of organic C added to the soil are usually not enough to cause significant changes in soil organic matter in the short term (Table 2).The letters in the tables represent statistical comparisons. Means followed by at least one equal letter do not differ statistically. Means followed by all the different letters differ significantly. The rotational crops also affected some soil attributes (Table 2). The organic matter content increased in the soil upper layer (0-0.2 m) with the cultivation of peanut cv. IAC-Tatu and velvet bean, and in the 0.2-0.4 m layer, with mung bean, sunflower IAC-Uruguai, and peanut cv. IAC-Tatu. The increase of soil exchangeable magnesium was also observed for peanut cv. IAC-Tatu and velvet bean, although the original Mg content was already high.

Organic matter

Mg

Rotational crops

0-0.2 m

0.2-0.4 m Average

0-0.2 m

0.2-0.4 m

Average

— g kg-1 ——

mmolc dm

-3 ——

Control

20 Ab

19 Ab

19

21

19

20 b

Mung bean cv. M146

19 Ab

20 Aa

20

19

18

19 b

Peanut cv. IAC-Caiapo

21 Ab

19 Bb

20

24

15

20 b

Peanut cv. IAC-Tatu

23 Aa

21 Aa

22

29

23

26 a

Soybean cv. IAC-17

19 Ab

17 Bb

18

20

17

18 b

Sunflower cv. IAC- Uruguai

20 Ab

20 Aa

20

20

19

19 b

Sunn hemp IAC 1

19 Ab

18 Ab

18

19

17

18 b

Velvet bean

23 Aa

18 Bb

21

28

18

23 a

Average

21 A

19 B

20

22 A

18 B

20

JC. V.(%)

8.1

8.1

18.4

22.6

Means followed by the same lower-case letter in the columns and capital letter in the rows are not different (Comparisons among means were made according to Tukey-Kramer test, p > 0.1).

Coefficient of variation. Adapted from [14].

Table 2. Organic matter and exchangeable magnesium in soil sampled after rotational crops.

Sunflower accumulated more above-ground dry matter of total biomass and soybean more grain yield than the other crops (Table 3). Soybean, sunn hemp, velvet bean, and sunflower extracted the greatest amounts of N and P (Table 4). Sunflower also recycled more of K, Ca, Mg, and Zn than the other rotational crops, probably as a consequence of the higher biomass yield (Tables 3 and 4).

Soybean presented the highest N content, and sunflower the lowest. No differences were observed between peanuts and velvet bean and between sunn hemp and mung bean (Table 5). Among the macronutrients, N had the highest and P the lowest accumulation in the rotational crops. On the average Fe was recycled in the highest amounts in the above­ground parts of the rotational crops and Zn in the lowest (Table 4). The same results were observed by [29]) who evaluated pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) and stylo plants (Stylosanthes guianensis var. vulgaris cv. Mineirao).

The high AMF infection rate, which helps the uptake of micronutrients (Table 3), may explain the high amounts of Zn returned to the soil when sunflower was grown before sugarcane. There is an increasing utilization of sunflower as a crop rotation with sugarcane in Brazil, due to its use for silage, seed oil production, and to its potential as a feedstock for biodiesel [30].

The amounts of N in the above-ground parts of sunn hemp (Table 4) were relatively low compared to those of [31], who reported the extraction of up to 230 kg ha-1 of N, and to those of [12], who found 196 kg ha-1 of N. However, the amounts of N returned to the soil are directly related to the nutrient concentration in the plant, which varies with the local potential for biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) and with the growth stage of the crop at the time of cutting, and with the biomass yield, which is affected by the weather, soil, and crop growing conditions.

Rotational crop

Above ground dry matter2

Grain yield2

Natural infection of AMF

———— kg ha-1———-

%

Control

Mung bean cv. M146

2,225 d

798 d

51 b

Peanut cv. IAC-Caiapo

1,905 d

1,096 c

74 a

Peanut cv. IAC-Tatu

1,783 d

1,349 c

57 b

Soybean cv. IAC-17

3,669 c

2,970 a

56 b

Sunflower cv. IAC-Uruguai

15,229 a

1,805 b

73 a

Sunn hemp IAC 2

6,230 b

49 c

Velvet bean

5,049 b

65 a

!CV. %

5.1

22.1

15.9

Means followed by the same letter in each column are not different (Comparisons among means were made according to Scott-Knott test, p = 0.05).

1Coefficient of variation.

2 Analysis of variance were made after data transformation to log (*).Adapted from [14].

Table 3. Dry mass and grain yields of the rotational crops and percentage of infection of natural arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) in roots of rotational crops.

Rotational crops

N

P

K2

Ca2

Mg2

Fe2

Mn2

Zn2

— kg ha

1 ——-

g ha-1 —

Control

Mung bean cv. M146

27 b

2.4 b

17 d

17 d

12 d

2,073 a

258 a

43 c

Peanut cv. IAC-Caiapo

39 b

2.7 b

35 c

19 d

13 c

3,279 a

222 a

47 c

Peanut cv. IAC-Tatu

34 b

3.8 b

27 c

18 d

11 c

1,679 a

81 b

37 c

Soybean cv. IAC-17

122 a

8.7 a

14 d

46 c

28 b

1,424 a

186 a

56 c

Sunflower IAC- Uruguai

Sunn hemp IAC 2

71 a

7.7 a

120 a

171 a

98 a

2,736 a

324 a

259 a

97 a

5.8 a

33 c

34 c

21 b

1,313 b

178 a

84 b

Velvet bean

109 a

8.9 a

50 b

61 b

17 b

792 a

159 a

90 b

!C. V. %

10.9

42.5

13.3

9.7

13.0

9.5

10.1

9.9

Means followed by the same letter in each column are not different (Comparisons among means were made according to Scott-Knott test, p = 0.05).

1Coefficient of variation.

2 Analysis of variance were made after data transformation to log (*).Adapted from [14].

Table 4. Nutrient content of above ground biomass of the rotational crops, excluding the grains.

Perin [32] found substantial amounts of N derived from BNF present in the above ground parts of sunn hemp (57.0%) grown isolated and 61.1% when intercropped with millet (50% seeded with each crop). The sunn hemp+ millet treatment grown before a maize crop resulted in higher grain yield than when sunn hemp alone was the preceding rotation. This effect was not observed when N-fertilizer (90 kg N ha-1) was added. Intercropping legume and cereals is a promising biological strategy to increase and keep N into the production system under tropical conditions [32]. A large proportion of the N present in soybeans usually comes from BNF. Guimaraes [33] found that 96% of the N present in above ground parts of soybeans were derived from BNF, values which are in agreement with those obtained by [32] for sunn hemp. However, in the present study, only about 27% of the N present in the soybean residues were from BNF (Table 5), probably because of poor specific population of fixing bacteria for soybeans in the experimental site, which have been grown with sugarcane for long time. No inoculation of soybean with Bradyrhizobium was done. The contribution of BNF for the peanut varieties was significantly different: it reached 70% of the N in the cv. IAC — Caiapo but only 37.7% in the cv. IAC-Tatu (Table 5). Usually the natural population of rhyzobia is high enough to guarantee root colonization for peanuts but probably the bacteria population in the soil of the experimental site was not efficient for peanuts cv. IAC-Tatu.

Rotational crop

C content

N content

C : N

N-BNF

————- g kg-i————-

%

Mung bean cv. M146

426 a

12.5 c

34.1 b

89 a

Peanut cv. IAC-Caiapo

424 a

20.9 b

20.3 b

70 b

Peanut cv. IAC-Tatu

440 a

19.2 b

23.0 b

38 c

Soybean cv. IAC-17

426 a

31.9 a

13.3 b

27 c

Sunflower IAC-Uruguai

429 a

4.6 d

92.4 a

Sunn hemp IAC 2

449 a

17.2 c

26.1 b

69 b

Velvet bean

446 a

21.6 b

20.7 b

62 b

1C. V. %

2.8

19.1

19.6

13.7

Means followed by the same letter in each column are not different (Comparisons among means were made according to Scott-Knott test, p = 0.05).

Coefficient of variation. Adapted from [14].

Table 5. Carbon and nitrogen concentration, carbon to nitrogen ratio, and N derived from biological N2 fixation (BNF) in the aboveground parts of the rotational crops at harvesting.

The rate of natural colonization with AMF was relatively high in all crops (Table 3). Peanut cv. IAC-Caiapo and sunflower cv. IAC-Uruguai, followed by velvet bean, had at least 64% of root infection with AMF. At the same time, sunflower produced the greatest amount of above-ground biomass, followed by C. juncea and velvet bean. Soybean had the highest grain yield (Table 3) and also presented a considerable percentage of root infection with AMF: 56% (Table 3). Besides the symbiotic association with rhizobia, roots of the legumes can be colonized by fungi of the family Endogonaceae that form vesicular-arbuscular (VA) endomycorrhizas, which help enhance the uptake of phosphorus and other nutrients [34].

Results of a nursery study on the effect of a short season pre-cropping with different mycotrophic herbaceous crops on growth of arbuscular mycorrhiza-dependent mandarin orange plants at an early stage after transplantation were presented by [20]. Mandarin orange seedling plants 180 days after transplantation showed variation in shoot growth in response to single season pre-cropping with seven different crops—maize, Paspalum millet, soybean, onion, tomato, mustard, and ginger, and two non-cropped fallow treatments— non-weeded and weeded fallows. Net growth benefit to the orange plants due to the different pre-crops and the non-weeded fallow treatment over the weeded fallow treatment plants showed a highly positive correlation with mycorrhizal root mass of the orange plants as it varied with the pre-crop treatments. Increase in citrus growth varied between 0 and 50% depending upon the mycorrhizal root mass of the pre-crops and weeds, AMF spore number, and infective inoculum density of the pre-cropped soils. These pre-crop variables individually and cumulatively contributed to the highly significant positive correlation between the AMF potential of the pre-cropped soils and growth of mandarin orange plants through their effect on mycorrhizal root mass development (i. e. extent of mycorrhization) of the mandarin orange plants. The choice of a pre-crop from the available options, grown even for a short season, can substantially alter the inherent AMF potential of soils to a significant influence on the performance of the mycorrhiza-dependent orange plant. The relationship between soil mycorrhizal potential left by a pre-crop and mycorrhizal benefit drawn by the succeeding AMF responsive plant can be of advantage for the exploitation of native AMF potential of soils for growth and nutrition management of crops in low nutrient, low input-output systems of production [20].

Sugarcane yield increased more than 30%, in average, due to the rotational crops as compared with the control treatment; those benefits lasted up to the third harvest (Table 6). In the first cutting, sunflower was the rotational crop that induced the greater yield increase, followed by peanut cv. IAC-Caiapo, and soybean cv. IAC 17. [35] observed that sunn hemp residues increased the sugarcane yield; in the first harvest after the green manure, the effect of the legume crop was better than that of chemical fertilization with nitrogen. Similar results were reported later by [36], with a yield rise of 15.4 tons ha-1 of sugarcane stalks, which represented about 24% increase in relation to the control. Positive effects on stalk yields were also found by [31] when sugarcane was grown after Crotalaria spectabilis, and by [36], who cultivated sugarcane after sunn hemp and velvet bean.

Sunflower was the best rotational treatment, causing an yield increased of around 46% in the first harvest after the rotational crops (Table 6). Meanwhile, in the average of three cuttings, peanut showed an yield increase of around 22% whereas sunflower presented a 10% yield increase; these results are in agreement with those of [31, 36].

The sugar content of sugarcane stalks is important because the raw material remuneration takes into account this parameter. Some crops that preceded sugarcane had a high effect on sugar yield (Table 7); this was observed mainly in the first harvest in areas where sunflower, peanuts and C. juncea were previously cultivated (Table 2). The 3-year average data showed a sugar yield increase, in the best treatment, of 3 t ha-1 in relation to the control. These results were already observed by [35, 31] who found an average increase of 2.98 ton-1 ha due to green manure crops grown before sugarcane.

Rotational crops

Stem yield

First cut

Second cut Third cut

Average

————— ton ha-1 ——————-

Control

47.6 Bc

111.2 Aa

50.7 Ba

69.8

Mung bean cv. M146

61.6 Bb

131.9 Aa

54.7 Ba

82.7

Peanut cv. IAC-Caiapo

67.6 Ba

130.6 Aa

58.0 Ba

85.4

Peanut cv. IAC-Tatu

60.6 Bb

114.9 Aa

66.8 Ba

80.8

Soybean cv. IAC-17

67.5 Ba

124.9 Aa

56.7 Ca

83.1

Sunflower cv. IAC-Uruguai

69.5 Ba

105.2 Aa

55.3 Ca

76.7

Sunn hemp IAC 1

65.9 Bab

125.8 Aa

51.1 Ca

80.9

Velvet bean

61.3 Bb

116.3 Aa

61.2 Ba

79.6

Average

62.7

120.1

56.8

SEM1

0.85

3.80

1.65

Means followed by the same lower-case letter in the columns and capital letter in the rows are not different

(Comparisons among means were made according to Tukey-Kramer test, p > 0.1).

Standard error of the mean. SEM for

comparison of rotational crops is

4.22. Adapted from [14].

Table 6. Yield of millable stems of sugarcane grown after rotational crops planted before the first

sugarcane cycle.

Rotational crop

Sugar yield1

First cut

Second cut

Third cut Averag

e SEM2

— ton ha-1 ————

Control

6.9 Bb

18.1 Aa

7.5 Ba 10.3

1.4

Mung bean cv. M146

9.3 Ba

19.6 Aa

8.3 Ba 12.4

1.7

Peanut cv. IAC-Caiapo

9.9 Ba

21.2 Aa

8.9 Ba 13.3

1.6

Peanut cv. IAC-Tatu

8.8 Cab

18.5 Aa

10.5 Ba 12.6

1.3

Soybean cv. IAC-17

10.0 Ba

17.7 Aa

8.8 Ba 12.2

1.3

Sunflower cv. IAC-Uruguai

10.3 Ba

15.5 Aa

8.1 Ca 11.3

1.0

Sunn hemp IAC 2

9.3 Ba

19.2 Aa

7.5 Ca 12.0

1.5

Velvet bean

9.2 Ba

18.5 Aa

9.5 Ba 12.4

1.3

Average

9.2

18.6

8.6

SEM2

0.2

0.6

0.3

Means followed by the same lower-case letter in the columns and capital letter in the rows are not different (Comparisons among means were made according to Tukey-Kramer test, p > 0.1).

1 Apparent sucrose content in the cane juice.

2Standard error of the mean. Adapted from [14].

Table 7. Sugar yields of three consecutive cuttings of sugarcane grown after rotational crops.

Studying crop rotation with legume plants in comparison with a control with and without a mineral N addition, [35] observed that, after a crop rotation, the sugarcane yield was higher after C. juncea and velvet bean, with 3.0 and 3.2 stalk tons ha-1 increase, respectively. The treatments with an addition of N fertilizer but no-rotation with green manure resulted in only 1.1 tons ha-1 of a sugar yield increase, in the average of three years, suggesting that the beneficial influence of leguminous plants is not restricted to the N left by the leguminous plants after harvest.

Farmers must combine the resources of land, labor, management, and capital in order to derive the most profit. Since resources are usually scarce, maximizing returns on each one is important. Crop rotations provide income diversification. If profitability of one crop is reduced because of price variation or some unpredicted reason, income is not as likely to be adversely affected as if the whole farm was planted to this crop, provided that a profit potential exists for each crop in a rotation. This is especially important to the farmer with limited capital.

Some of the general purposes of rotations are to improve or maintain soil fertility, reduce the erosion, reduce the build-up of pests and diseases, best distribute the work load, reduce the risk of weather damage, reduce the reliance on agricultural chemicals, and increase the net profits. Crop rotations have fallen somewhat into disfavor because they require additional planning and management skills, increasing the complexity of farming operations.

Crop rotation can positively affect yield and increase profit (Table 8). Except for peanuts, all other rotational crops contributed to raise the net income. This was true both for the green manures (crotalaria juncea and velvet bean), as for the grain crops (soybean, sunflower and mung bean). Peanuts caused an increase in the sugarcane stalk yields relative to the control, especially in the first harvest (Table 8), but the high cost of production of this grain somewhat cancelled out the benefit of this rotation. However, in many sugarcane regions in Sao Paulo State peanuts are extensively grown in rotation with sugarcane, probably because in those sites yields are higher and the cost of production, lower. Mung beans are a niche crop. Although it provided a relatively high net return in the present study (Table 8), the risks may be high due to the market restrictions and price fluctuations.

Rotational crop

Gross revenue

Cost of production

Net income

— U$ ha-1———————

Control

3,710

3,111

599 b

Mung bean cv. M146

6,131

5,118

1,012 a

Peanut cv. IAC-Caiapo

4,784

4,591

193 b

Peanut cv. IAC-Tatu

4,606

4,401

205 b

Soybean cv. IAC-17

4,961

3,624

1,337 a

Sunflower cv. IAC-Uruguai

4,431

3,584

847 a

Sunn hemp IAC 2

4,263

3,195

1,068 a

Velvet bean

4,193

3,212

981 a

C. V.(%)

24.1

Means followed by the same letter in the column are not different (Comparisons among means were made according to Scott-Knott test, p > 0.05).

aGross revenue includes sales of the three harvests of sugarcane plus grains of rotational crops. Cost of production includes land and crop management, chemicals, feedstock, and harvesting costs of all sugarcane and rotational crops, but excludes land rental. Adapted from [14].

Table 8. Economic balance1 of sugarcane production including revenues and costs of crop rotation.

2. To evaluated the recovery of nitrogen by sugarcane when applied green manure crop and mineral N

To evaluate the utilization of nitrogen by sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) fertilized with sunn hemp (SH) (Crotalaria juncea L.) and ammonium sulfate (AS):

The presence of a green manure crop and mineral N applied together caused some soil alterations that could be detected in samples collected in the sugarcane planting and harvesting seasons (Table 9). There was an increase in calcium and magnesium availability, and consequently in base saturation and pH, in relation to the AS-15N treatment, at planting. Similar results were obtained by [38], who worked with four velvet bean cultivars, velvet bean, Georgia velvet bean, cow itch, and cratylia. The presence of green manure caused a significant sum of bases increase, due to increases in calcium and magnesium; consequently, treatments involving velvet bean showed higher CEC values. The presence of organic acids in the plant mass could be the reason for this change.

During sugarcane harvest, increases in Mg concentration, pH, and base saturation (V%) were observed in the treatments containing SH-15N+ AS in relation to the treatment containing AS-15N alone. Also, a significant reduction in potential acidity was observed in treatments containing SH-15N+ AS in relation to the treatment containing AS-15N alone (Table 9).

Soil sampling at sugarcane planting

Treatment

pH (CaCl2)

Ca

Mg

H+Al

SB

V

0.01mol l-1

—- mmolc dm-3

—- % ——

Control

5.1 ab

20.5 ab

14.5 ab

37.8 a

35.4 ab

48.2 a

AS-15N2

4.7 b

15.8 b

9.8 b

47.0 a

25.9 b

36.0 a

SH + AS -15N

5.3 a

24.8 a

17.8 a

32.0 a

42.8 a

55.8 a

SH-15N

5.0 ab

18.0 ab

13.0 ab

39.0 a

31.4 ab

44.5 a

Mean

5.0

19.8

13.8

39.0

33.9

46.1

C. V.%

5.12

7.55

10.76

20.77

6.81

22.52

Control

Soil sampling at sugarcane harvest 5.0 ab 17.8 a 14.0 ab

39.8 ab

32.2 a

44.5 ab

AS-15N

4.7 b

15.3 a

9.8 b

46.5 a

25.4 a

35.8 b

SH + AS -15N

5.6 a

24.7 a

26.8 a

25.5 b

44.4 a

67.5 a

SH-15N

5.0 ab

19.0 a

15.3 ab

36.3 ab

34.5 a

48.5 ab

Mean

5.0

18.0

16.4

37.0

33.5

49.1

C. V.%

8.00

30.88

15.18

25.87

32.45

29.57

Means followed by different letters in columns in each sampling season are different (Comparisons among means were made according to Tukey test P < 0.05).

2 Treatments were: Control (no N fertilizer applied), AS-15N (15N-labeled ammonium sulfate), SH + AS -15N (Sunn hemp + 15N-labeled ammonium sulfate), SH-15N (15N-labeled Sunn hemp). Adapted from [12].

Table 9. Chemical characterization of the soil (0.0-0.2 m depth) in the sugarcane planting and harvesting seasons.

The presence of organic acids in decomposing plant residues can help Mg movement in the soil [39]. Crops with high C:N ratio may release N more slowly and cause an increase in N uptake by succeeding crop In addition, rotational plants that were grown before sugarcane could recycle nutrients that would otherwise be leached contribute with N derived from BNF and keep some elements in plant available forms, which could be transformed into more recalcitrant forms if the soil lie fallow for some time.

There was no variation in nutrient contents for macronutrients N and P, and for micronutrients B and Zn in sugarcane stalks at harvest time (Table 10). However, there were differences in Ca and K contents; the latter showed higher values in treatments involving fertilizer application, either mineral or organic, while Ca showed a higher value in the treatment with green manure and mineral N, indicating better nutrition with this element in the treatment containing higher nitrogen supply.

Nitrogen and potassium absorption is greatly influenced by moisture; this relation has been known for a long time [40], and the fact that treatments involving green manure crops maintained environments with higher moisture due to soil mulching with plant mass could have favored better potassium nutrition. With regard to calcium, nitrogen seems to favor absorption [41].

Treatment

N

K

P

Ca

Zn

B

Contents determined

in sugarcane

stalks at harvest

-g kg-1——

-mg kg-1—

Control

7.2 a

3.3 b

0.8 a

1.6 b

10.9 a

12.1 a

AS-15N2

8.1 a

6.7 a

0.9 a

1.7 b

15.3 a

14.9 a

SH-15N

7.7 a

7.1 a

0.9 a

1.8 b

13.3 a

14.8 a

SH + AS -15N

8.8 a

8.5 a

1.0 a

2.4 a

13.7 a

15.4 a

Mean

8.0

6.4

0.9

1.88

13.3

14.3

C. V.%

11.52

27.89

15.61

8.14

19.80

18.00

Means followed by different letters in columns are different (Comparisons among means were made according to Tukey test P < 0.05).

2 Treatments were: Control (no N fertilizer applied), AS-15N (15N-labeled ammonium sulfate), SH-15N (15N-labeled Sunn hemp), SH + AS -15N (Sunn hemp + 15N-labeled ammonium sulfate). Adapted from [12].

Table 10. N, K, P, Ca, Zn, and B contents in sugarcane stalks at harvest time.

When sugarcane was cultivated for five years and was harvested three times. 15N recovery was evaluated in the two first harvests. In the sum of the three harvests, the highest stalk yields were obtained with a combination of green manure and inorganic N fertilizer; however, in the second cutting the yields were higher where sunn hemp (SH) was used than in plots with ammonium sulfate (AS) (Table 11).

Millable stalk yields of the first cycle (plant cane, harvested 18 months after planting) were higher than those of the second and the third cycle (Table 11). The yield decline with time is common, especially in the cases such as the present experiment when only the first cycle crop was fertilized in order to evaluate the residual effect of N application in the mineral or green manure forms. In the first year the stalk yield was numerically higher in plots fertilized with a combination of green manure and AS; however, in the second year the plots that received SH produced more cane than those fertilized only with AS or the control treatment, indicating that the green manure applied before planting still affected plant growth and yield after 34 months. In the third cycle, there were no differences among the treatments, showing that the residual effect of both N sources had disappeared (Table 11). In the sum of three cuttings, the combination of AS and green manure resulted in highest yields.

Treatments2

Harvests

Total of three

Mean ± SEM3

24 Aug 2002

08 Oct 2003

20 Sep 2004

cuttings

Control

86.0 Ba

61.1 Bab

— Stalk yield, Mg ha-1—————

47.1 Ab b194.2

64.7 ± 4.6

AS15N

106.2 ABa

64.7 Bb

42.3 Ab

ab213.2

71.1 ± 4.6

SH + AS15N

128.7 Aa

84.5Ab

45.0 Ac

a258.2

86.1 ± 4.6

SH15N

92.4 ABa

83.8 Aa

41.2 Ab

ab217.3

72.4 ± 4.6

Mean ± SEM

103.3 ± 3.8 a 73.5 ± 3.8 b

43.9 ± 3.8 c

215.4 ± 18.9

Control

11.9

10.4

— POL, Mg ha-1

17.9

b40.2

13.5 ± 0.7 B

AS15N

14.9

11.1

17.5

ab43.5

14.5 ± 0.6 AB

SH + AS15N

17.0

14.1

18.4

a49.5

16.5 ± 0.6 A

SH15N

12.9

14.2

18.1

ab45.2

15.1 ± 0.6 AB

Mean ± SEM

14.2 ± 0.9 b

12.4 ± 0.9 b

18.0 ± 0.9 a

43.8 ± 2.4

Means followed by a different letter lower-case letter, in the rows, and upper-case letter, in the columns, are different (Comparisons among means were made according to Tukey-Kramer p < 0.1). Means followed by superscript letters differ vertically (Comparisons among means were made according to Tukey-Kramer p < 0.1).

1 Cane was planted on 01 Mar 2001. POL =apparent sucrose content in the cane juice.

2 Treatments were: Control (no N fertilizer applied), AS15N (15N-labeled ammonium sulfate); SH + AS15N (Sunn hemp + 15N-labeled ammonium sulfate); SH15N (15N-labeled Sunn hemp).

3 Standard error of the mean. Adapted from [17].

Table 11. Millable stalk yield and POL1 of sugarcane plants in three consecutive harvests as a function of N applied at planting as ammonium sulfate (AS) or Sunn hemp (SH) green manure1

[36] showed evidence of the positive effect of green manure fertilization with sunn hemp in sugarcane, with greater sugarcane yield increase than with the application of 40 kg ha-1 mineral N to the soil. [43], studying lupine in maize, and [44], studying velvet bean and sunn hemp in rice, could not find response to mineral N applied after green manure, and no N fertilizer was needed when vetch (Vicia spp.) was grown after wheat, and when cotton followed faba beans [42].

The effect of fertilizer source on sugar concentration was less evident. In the average of three cuttings, the value of pol in plots, treated with both AS + SH was higher than in that observed in plots that received no N (Table 11). Pol in cane juice was higher in the third cutting than in the two previous ones. Variations in pol measurements among cropping seasons are usually more affected by environmental conditions (temperature and drought) that determine cane maturation than by nutrition. However, high N tends to decrease sugar content and delay maturation [45]; therefore, after two years with no N fertilization, sugar content in cane plants was more likely to be high.

The recovery of N by the first two consecutive harvests accounted for 19 to 21% of the N applied as leguminous green manure and 46 to 49% of the N applied as AS.

Nitrogen derived from AS and SH in the leaves and top parts of the sugarcane plant, excluding the stalks, varied from 6.9 to 12.3 % of the total N at the end of the first cycle (plant cane) and was not affected by N source (Table 12). But the amounts of N from both sources accumulated in the leaves and tops were in the range of only 4.5 to 6.0 kg ha-1, which represent a recovery of 6.4 to 8.1% of the N applied as AS and 2.7 and 3.1% of the N from the green manure (Table 12). The recovery of 15N in the second cycle decreased when the N source was the inorganic fertilizer. In the second year the percentage of N derived from sunn hemp was greater than that from the AS, indicating a slightly higher residual effect of the green manure (Table 12).

Sampling Treatments2 Mean ± SEM3

dates AS15N SH-15N + AS SH15N AS15N+ SH

————————— Ndff,%—————————

24 Aug 2002

12.3 Aa

11.1 Aa

10.9 Aa

6.9 Aa

10.3 ± 1.1

08 Oct 2003

1.7 Bb

5.5 Aa

4.1 Aab

1.7 Bb

3.2 ± 1.1

Mean ± SEM

7.0 ± 1.6

8.3 ± 1.6

7.5 ± 1.6

4.3 ± 1.6

——- QNdff, kg ha-1————-

24 Aug 2002

5.7

6.0

5.2

4.5

5.4 ± 0.6 A

08 Oct 2003

1.8

6.8

4.6

2.9

4.0 ± 0.6 A

Mean ± SEM

3.7 ± 1.0 a

6.4 ± 1.0 a

4.9 ± 1.0 a

3.7 ± 1.0 a

———— R, % —

24 Aug 2002

8.1 Aa

3.1 Aa

2.7 Aa

6.4 Aa

5.1 ± 0.6

08 Oct 2003

2.6 Ba

3.5 Aa

2.3 Aa

4.1 Aa

3.1 ± 0.6

Mean ± SEM

5.3 ± 0.9

3.3 ± 0.9

2.5 ± 0.9

5.3 ± 0.9

Means followed by a different letter lower-case letter, in the rows, and capital letter, in the columns, are different [Comparisons among means were made according to Tukey-Kramer and F’ tests (p < 0.1), respectively].

1 Cane was planted on 01 Mar 2001.

2 Treatments were: Control (no N fertilizer applied), AS15N (15N-labeled ammonium sulfate); SH + AS15N (Sunn hemp 15N-labeled ammonium sulfate); SH15N (15N-labeled Sunn hemp).

3 Standard error of the mean. Adapted from [12].

Table 12. Percentage (Ndff) and quantity (QNdff) of nitrogen in leaves derived from the labeled fertilizer source and nitrogen recovery (R) in samples taken in the first and second harvests1.

The percentage of N derived from the AS or SH accumulated in the stalks harvested in the first cycle were similar and ranged from 7.0 to 10.5% of the total N content. In the plant cane cycle the amounts of N in the stalks that had been applied as inorganic or organic fertilizers were higher than those measured in the leaves and tops and varied from 27.3 to 24.1 kg N ha-1 (Table 13). The recovery of N derived from inorganic fertilizer — 30.1 to 34.4% — was higher than that of the sunn hemp — 8.8 to 9.8%. However, in the second harvest the N the green manure supplied more N to the cane stalk than AS (Table 13). The difference in the amounts of N in the sugarcane plants derived from green manure and mineral fertilizer in the ratoon crop was around 1to 2 kg ha-1 N in leaves and tops (Table 12) and 4 to 7 kg N ha-1 in the stalks (Table 13), which were relatively small compared to the amounts of N accumulated in the ratoon plants (179 kg N ha-1 in plants supplied with AS and 243 kg ha-1 N in the SH treatments, or a 64 kg N ha-1difference — Table 13). These results suggest that the effect of green manure on the yield of the second ratoon crop (Table 11) may not be only due to the extra N supply, but rather to other beneficial role of green manure on soil physical — chemical or biological activity properties.

Adding up the amounts of N taken up by the sugarcane plant and contained in the above­ground parts of the plant (leaves, tops and stalks), AS supplied 32.4 to 34.2 kg N ha-1or about 46 to 49% of N recovery; the N taken up by sugarcane from sunn hemp varied from 37.4 to 40.0 kg ha-1, which represented 19.1 to 20.8% N recovery (Tables 12 and 13).

The recovery of N from fertilizers by sugarcane is usually lower than that of grain crops: the latter varies from 50 to 70% [46] whereas for sugarcane the figures vary from 20 to 40% [47­49, 25]. Results of several studies show that the utilization of N from green manure by subsequent crops rarely exceeds 20% [43, 50, 12, 51] and most of the N remains in the soil, incorporated in the organic matter fraction. In the present study the application of AS along with SH increased N utilization by sugarcane plants. This result is in line with that of [44] who used an organic source isolated or combined with an inorganic fertilizer in rice crops and concluded that the green manures improved the mineral N utilization, resulting in N use efficiency of up to 79%.

In a study in pots [51] observed that maize plants took up more N from sunn hemp incorporated to a sandy soil (Paleudalf) than to a clayey soils (Eutrudox) and that the N derived from the roots was more recalcitrant than that of the shoots. Between 50 and 68% of the 15N of the sunn hemp shoots remained in the soil whereas the figures for roots varied from 65 to 80%. Unaccounted for 15N, probably lost in gaseous forms, varied from 5 to 15% of the sunn hemp N [51].

In a detailed account of the first year of the present experiment, [12] showed that 8 months after planting, the recovery by sugarcane plants (above ground parts) of the N derived from AS or from sunn hemp was similar: 3 to 6% of the added N. However, 12 and 15-month-old sugarcane plants recovered between 20 and 35% of the AS but only 6 to 8% of the sunn hemp-derived N.

The percentage of recovery of the inorganic fertilizer N contained in the stalk when the sugarcane plants were harvested after 18 months of planting varied from 30 to 34%; the corresponding figures for the N derived from sunn hemp were significantly lower: around 9

AS[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]N + SH

Подпись: Treatments2 Подпись: Mean ± SEM3

to 10% (Table 13). The residual effect of the N from both sources in the second harvest of the sugarcane plant was similar: between 4 and 6% of the N supplied at planting as AS or SH was recovered in the stalks of the sugarcane plant 31 months after planting (Table 12).

Подпись: 24 Aug 2002 10.5 Aa 7.0 Aa 8.2 Aa 08 Oct 2003 1.4 Bb 3.8 Aa 3.7 Aa Mean ± SEM 6.0 ± 1.2 5.4 ± 1.2 5.9 ± 1.2 QNdff, kg ha'1 24 Aug 2002 24.1 Aa 19.3 Aa 17.3 Aa 08 Oct 2003 2.7 Bb 8.6 Aa 10.3 Aa Media ± SEM 13.4 ± 2.6 14.0 ± 2.6 13.8 ± 2.6 R, % 24 Aug 2002 34.4 Aa 9.9 Abc 8.8 Ac 08 Oct 2003 3.9 Ba 4.4 Aa 5.3 Aa Mean ± SEM 19.1 ± 3.2 7.1 ± 3.2 7.0 ± 3.2 - Cumulative N kg ha-1 24 Aug 2002 177.4 235.6 257.0 08 Oct 2003 181.0 190.8 228.0 Mean ± SEM 179.2 ± 12.0 a 213.2 ± 12.0 a 139.9 ± 12.0 a Подпись: Sampling dates AS15N SH 15N + AS SH15N Ndff, % Подпись: 10.3 Aa 1.7 Bb 6.0 ± 1.2Подпись: 21.1 Aa 3.9 Bb 12.5 ± 2.6Подпись:Подпись: 220.4 270.8 245.6 ± 12.0 a 9.0 ± 1.2

2.6 ± 0.1

20.4 ± 2.78

6.4 ± 0.8

20.8 ± 1.9

4.8 ± 1.9

222.6 ± 9.2 A

217.6 ± 9.2 A
accumulation during the last three months, as also observed by [49]. The nitrogen contents found in the above-ground part of sugarcane, Table 10, are in agreement with results of [47].

As the amounts of N applied as AS or SH to sugarcane in the first cycle were different (70 kg N ha-1as AS and 196 kg N ha-1 as SH), the quantities of N derived from the green manure in the second harvest were larger than those from the inorganic fertilizer, although the percentage of N recovery was similar (Table 12).

Because less N derived from the green manure was recovered by the sugarcane plant in the first cycle it would be expected that a higher proportion of that N would be taken up in the second cycle (first ratoon), but this did not happen. It seems that the residual N that is incorporated to the soil organic matter has a somewhat long turnover. Other authors have reported low recovery (about 3.5% of the N) by the second crop after sunn hemp cover crop

[52] or hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth) plowed into the soil [53]. Low recovery of residual N has also been observed for inorganic fertilizer sources: less than 3% of the N derived from fertilizers was taken up by soybeans (Glicine max (L) Merril) [54], maize (Zea Mays L.) [52],

[53] or sugarcane (Saccharum spp) [55], results similar to those obtained in the present study (Table 12 and 13).

The amounts of inorganic N, derived from both N sources, present in the 0-0.4 m layer of soil in the first season after N application and were below 1 kg ha-1.

The average concentration of inorganic nitrogen in the 0-40 cm layer of soil was relatively low in most samples taken after 8, 12, 15, and 18 months of planting (Table 14). Samples taken in February, in the middle of the rainy and hot season, presented somewhat higher values of (NH4+ + NO3-)-N probably reflecting higher mineralization of soil organic N (Figure 2). Later in the growing season (samples of May and Aug 2002) soil inorganic N content decreased again. This coincides with beginning of the dry season with mild temperatures, when the sugarcane plant reached maturity and probably had already depleted the soil for most of the available N.

Treatments1

Sampling dates

29 Oct 2001

20 Feb 2002

28 May 2002

24 Aug 2002

Mean ± SEM2

Control

2.7 Ab

-mg kg-1——-

7.3 ABa

2.3 Ab

2.8 Ab

3.8 ± 0.22

AS15N

2.6 Ab

9.1 Aa

2.2 Ab

3.2 Ab

4.3 ± 0.22

SH15N + AS

2.9 Ab

7.0 ABa

2.7 Ab

3.1 Ab

3.9 ± 0.22

SH15N

2.8 Ab

5.8 Ba

1.5 Bc

2.8 Ab

3.2 ± 0.22

SH + AS15N

2.7 Ab

7.2 ABa

3.1 Ab

2.6 Ab

3.9 ± 0.22

Mean ± SEM

2.7 ± 0.19

7.3 ± 0.19

2.4 ± 0.19

2.9 ± 0.19

Means followed by a different letter lower-case letter, in the rows, and capital letter, in the columns, are different (Comparisons among means were made according to Tukey-Kramer test p < 0.1).

1 Treatments were: Control (no N fertilizer applied); AS15N (15N-labeled ammonium sulfate); SH + AS15N (Sunn hemp + 15N-labeled ammonium sulfate); SH15N (15N-labeled Sunn hemp).

2 Standard error of the mean. Adapted from [12].

Table 14. Soil mineral N (NH4+ + NO3-) determined in four sampling dates during the plant cane cycle. Data are average of samplings of the 0-0.2 and 0.2-0.4 m soil layers.

The percentage of the inorganic N derived from AS or SH present in the soil from the 8th to the 18th month after sugarcane planting represented only 1 to 9% of total inorganic N (Table 15). The proportion of N that was originated from AS decreased with time whereas that from the green manure increased, indicating that the mineralization of this organic source could supply more N at the end of the season (Table 15). Indeed, [12] showed that sugarcane stalks sampled in 15-month old plants had significantly higher percentage of N derived from AS than from SH; in the 18th month that difference had disappeared. Nonetheless, throughout the season, the amounts of inorganic N in the soil derived from either AS or SH were of very little significance for the nutrition of the sugarcane plant — less than 1 kg ha-1 of inorganic N in a 40 cm soil layer (Table 15), indicating that little residual N is expected in soils grown with this crop. Although the rate of N applied as SH was almost 200 kg N ha-1, little nitrate leaching losses are expected under the conditions of this experiment.

Treatments1

Sampling dates

29 Oct 2001

20 Feb 2002

28 May 2002

24 Aug 2002

Mean ± SEM2

———- Ndff, %——————

AS15N

5.9 Aa

0.7 Aa

3.2 Aa

1.0 Ba

2.7 ± 0.57

SH15N + AS

2.6 Ab

3.2 Aab

9.0 Aa

5.7 ABab

5.1 ± 0.62

SH15N

2.9 Aa

4.3 Aa

7.0 Aa

5.9 Aa

5.0 ± 0.58

SH + AS15N

2.9 Aa

0.3 Aa

4.0 Aa

1.3 ABa

2.1 ± 0.62

Mean ± SEM

3.6 ± 0.58

2.1 ± 0.56

5.8 ± 056

3.5 ± 0.55

————- QNdff, kg ha-1—————————

AS15N

0.3 Aa

0.3 Aa

0.4 Aa

0.5 Aa

0.40 ± 0.16

SH15N + AS

0.1 Aa

0.2 Aa

0.2 Aa

0.2 Aa

0.18 ± 0.18

SH15N

0.1 Aa

0.2 Aa

0.1 Aa

0.2 Aa

0.15 ± 0.16

SH + AS15N

0.1 Aa

0.1 Aa

0.1 Aa

0.0 Aa

0.07 ± 0.16

Mean ± SEM

0.15 ± 0.09

0.21 ± 0.09

0.24 ± 0.09

0.22 ± 0.09

For Ndff: means followed by a different letter lower-case letter, in the rows, and capital letter, in the columns, are different (Comparisons among means were made according to Tukey-Kramer and F tests p < 0.1), respectively.

For Qndff: means followed by a different letter lower-case letter, in the rows, and capital letter, in the columns, are different (Comparisons among means were made according to Tukey-Kramer test p < 0.1).

1 Treatments were: Control (no N fertilizer applied); AS15N (15N-labeled ammonium sulfate); SH + AS15N (Sunn hemp + 15N-labeled ammonium sulfate); SH15N (15N-labeled Sunn hemp).

2 Standard error of the mean. Adapted from [12].

Table 15. Percent (Ndff) and amount (QNdff) of soil mineral N (NH4+ + NO3-) derived from the labeled fertilizer source (Ndff). Data are average of samplings of the 0-0.2 and 0.2-0.4 m soil layers.

Soil N is often the most limiting element for plant growth and quality. Therefore, green manure may be useful for increasing soil fertility and crop production. With regard to fertilization, organic matter such as a green manure can be potentially important sources of N for crop production [56].

Sugarcane is a fast growing plant that produces high amounts of dry matter. Therefore, it tends to rapidly deplete the soil of inorganic N, especially in soils fertilized with small rates of soluble N as in the case of this study. Cantarella [25] reviewed several Brazilian studies showing little nitrate leaching losses in sugarcane. More recently, [57] showed that only 0.2 kg ha-1 NO3—N derived from 120 kg ha-1 of N as urea enriched to 5.04 15N At% applied to the planting furrow leached below 0.9 m in a sugarcane field, although the total N loss reached 18 kg ha-1 N, mostly derived from soil organic matter mineralization or residual N already present in the soil. As in the present study, the data of [57] refer to N applied at the end of the rainy season when excess water percolating through the soil profile is limited (Figure 2).

image2

Figure 2. Climatic data for maximum and minimum temperature and rainfall during the first sugarcane growing season (plant cane cycle experiment 2), adapted from [12].

5. To evaluate the effect of biomass on the occurrence of nematodes (Pratylenchus spp.) and sugarcane yield after five cuts

The legume most productive was sunn hemp crotalaria juncea IAC-1 with 10,264 kg ha-1, followed by velvet-bean with 4,391 kg ha-1 and peanuts IAC-Caiapo and IAC-Tatu with 3,177 kg ha-1 and 1,965 kg ha-1, respectively.

There was an increase of Stalk yield of sugarcane in the average of the five cuts, compared to control treatment (Table 16). It can be seen that the effect of planting green manure in the fields of sugarcane promoted reform of benefits in terms of increased productivity of sugarcane, and this is lasting reaching in this case until the fifth cut, and the only treatment that stood out was the rotation of the witness with sunn hemp. Notably, the sunn hemp had higher dry matter production, and this may be a positive influence on growth of sugarcane. After five harvests, sunn hemp crotalaria was the leguminous crop that induced the greatest sugarcane yield, with 30% increase in cane yield and 35% in sugar yield.

Rotational crop

Harvests

25 Oct 2001

9 Sep 2002 1Aug 2003

7Nov 2004

6 Oct 2005 Mean

— Stalk yield, Mg ha-1

Sunn hemp IAC 1

145.36

122.30

79.70

51.86

39.30

87.70 A

Velvet bean

141.2

121.88

75.72

51.78

28.12

85.56 AB

Peanut cv. IAC-Tatu

149.92

108.79

74.58

52.16

29.64

83.02 AB

Peanut cv. IAC-Caiapo

122.74

122.30

67.42

49.44

36.78

79.74 AB

Control

129.90

85.31

55.38

46.40

36.15

67.51 B

Mean

138.39 a

113.23 b

71.00 c

50.43 d

34.16 e

C. V.% (plot) = 7.57, CV% (subplots) = 4.20. Means followed by same lower-case letter in rows and capital letters in columns do not differ (Comparisons among means were made according to Tukey test p> 0.05). For statistical analysis the data were transformed into log (x). Adapted from [16].

Table 16. Millable stalk yield of sugarcane plants in five consecutive harvests as a function of treatments.

Crop rotation with non-host species of nematodes, when well planned, can be an efficient method for integrated control of nematodes. It is common in some areas, the practice of cultivation of Fabaceae in the period between the destruction of ratoon sugarcane field and planting the new. There are several plants used in systems of crop rotation with sugarcane, the most common are crotalarias, velvet beans, soybeans and peanuts. However, depending on nematode species occurring in the area, some of these cultures may significantly increase the population of these parasites. Thus, the sugarcane crop, can be greatly impaired by increasing the inoculum potential of the nematodes [58, 59].

The peanut IAC-Caiapo and velvet bean were the leguminous crops that resulted in the greater percentage of AM fungus. The lowest population of Pratylenchus spp. was found in the treatments with peanut IAC-Tatu and IAC-Caiapo (Figure 3).

Thet peanut IAC-Caiapo showed a minimum of 10 nematodes per 10 g of roots and a maximum of 470, while on the control this variation was from 80 to 2,510, indicating the smaller presence of the nematode in treatments with peanut IAC-Caiapo (Figure 3).

4000

image3

Peanut cv. Peanut cv. Control Sunn hemp Velvet bean ІАС-Tatu IAC-Caiapo IAC1

Treatments

Figure 3. Number of nematodes of the genus Pratylenchus spp. by 10 grams of roots of sugar sugarcane cultivation influenced by the previous legume species. Adapted from [16].

6. Conclusions

Crop rotation can positively affect yield and increase profit, contributed to raise the net income. This was true both for the green manures (sunn hemp and velvet bean), as for the grain crops (soybean, sunflower and mung bean). Peanuts caused an increase in the sugarcane stalk yields relative to the control, especially in the first harvest, but the high cost of production of this grain somewhat cancelled out the benefit of this rotation.

However, in many sugarcane regions in Sao Paulo State (Brazil) peanuts are extensively grown in rotation with sugarcane, probably because in those sites yields are higher and the cost of production, lower. Mung beans are a niche crop. Although it provided a relatively high net return in the present study, the risks may be high due to the market restrictions and price fluctuations.

The biomass of green manure induced a complete N substitution in sugarcane and can cause positively affect yield and increase Ca and Mg contents, sum of bases, pH, and base saturation, and decreasing potential acidity and increase profit.

The combination of inorganic fertilizer and green manure resulted in higher sugarcane yields than either N source separately. The recovery of N from ammonium sulfate was higher in the first year whereas in the green manure presented a longer residual effect and resulted in higher yields of cane in the second cycle. The recovery of 15N — labeled fertilizers by two successive sugarcane crops summed up 19 to 21% of the N applied as sunn hemp and 46 to 49% of the N applied as ammonium sulfate. Very little inorganic N was present in the 0-40 cm soil layer with both N sources.

The sugar content of sugarcane stalks is important because the raw material remuneration takes into account this parameter in Brazil. Some crops that preceded sugarcane had a high effect on sugar yield; this was observed mainly in the first harvest in areas where sunflower, peanuts, velvet beans and sunn hemp were previously cultivated. The 3-year average data showed a sugar yield increase, in the best treatment, of 3 t ha-1 in relation to the control.

The peanut IAC-Caiapo, sunflower and velvet bean were the leguminous crops that resulted in the greater percentage of AM fungus. The lowest population of Pratylenchus spp. was found in the treatments with peanut IAC-Tatu and IAC-Caiapo.

After five harvests, sunn hemp crotalaria was the leguminous crop that induced the greatest sugarcane yield, with 30% increase in cane yield and 35% in sugar yield.