Types of gasifier

Various gasifier technologies have been developed over many decades and tailored to suit specific needs. These processes operate at pressures from atmospheric to >20 bars and at temperatures between ~700-1500°C. According to the way the feedstock is brought in contact with the gasifying agent, the gasifier is classified into the following types.

16.4.1 Fixed bed gasifier

Fixed bed gasifiers, which consist of a fixed bed of biomass through which the oxidation medium flows in updraft or downdraft configuration, are simple and reliable designs and can be used to gasify wet biomass economically on a small scale for CHP applications (Wang et al., 2008). However, they produce syngas with large quantities of tar or/and char, due to the low and non-uniform heat and mass transfer between the solid biomass and the gasifying agent
(Wang et al., 2008). The product gas must be extensively cleaned before use. Moreover, the throughput for this type of gasifier is relatively low and, therefore, for large-scale applications, as in the case of biomass to liquid (BTL), with very strict requirements concerning the purity of the syngas, fixed bed gasifiers are considered unsuitable.

There are three types of fixed bed gasifiers, as shown in Fig. 16.5: updraft (counter-current), downdraft (co-current), and cross draft gasifier. In case of the updraft gasifier, the fuel is supplied at the top and the air at the bottom so that fuel moves against the air flow, while in the case of the downdraft, air is introduced above the oxidation zone and the product gas is removed from the bottom. In the case of the cross draft, feedstock moves downward while the product gas leaves in a sideways direction. Figure 16.6 shows temperature distribution along the height of the gasifier (see Table 16.2).

image91

In the case of the updraft gasifier, the tar content of the product gas is high, thus it cannot be used directly for the engine applications. As in an updraft gasifier, the pyrolysis zone lies above the combustion zone; the tar formed does not pass through the combustion zone, thus resulting in higher tar content in the product

Подпись: Steam oxygen or air image150 image151
Подпись: Gas
Подпись: Gas

image92Moving-bed gasifier (dry ash)

16.6 Temperature distribution along the height of the gasifier (Higman and Burgt, 2003).

gas. This is the opposite of the downdraft gasifiers, where all the pyrolyzed product passes through the oxidation zone, thus product gas has lower tar content. As in the case of the updraft gasifier, the hot gases pass upward so their energy is available to vaporize the moisture. Due to this property, updraft gasifiers can gasify relatively higher moisture content fuel than downdraft gasifiers. Constriction in the oxidation zone of the downdraft gasifier, however, makes its design more complicated and difficult to scale up. Cross draft gasifiers are used mainly for charcoal gasification. However, during the process, the temperature could reach 1500°C, which could lead to material problems (Stassen and Knoef, 2001).

Figure 16.7 shows different designs of downdraft gasifiers. The Imbert type has a narrow constriction near the oxidization zone for efficient combustion of the fuel. Conversely, the stratified type does not have any narrow constriction, making it easier to design and scale up. Another design is the multi-stage downdraft gasifier, which was developed and tested at the Asian Institute of Technology biomass research laboratory. In this type, air is supplied at two stages. Similarly, in the case of the two-stage gasifier, the biomass is first pyrolyzed in a separate zone and then the tar formed is combusted in another gasification zone to supply the heat required for gasification. This type of gasifier can produce product gas with a tar content well below 50 mg/Nm3. In the case of the vortex gasifier, the air is supplied so as to create a vortex that causes the volatile pyrolysis product to move up and in the presence of air become combusted. Although gasification and pyrolysis in the vortex gasifier take place in a single reactor, the tar content in a product gas is similar to that of the multi-stage gasifier (Fock and Thompson, 2001). The multi-fuel downdraft gasifier commercialized in China can be operated with wood, corncobs, hard nut shells, sawdust, and hard coal (see Table 16.3).

Table 16.2 Database of fixed bed gasifier

Country

Types

Fuel

Size

Organization/

Project

USA

Downdraft

Hogged wood, stumps

1 MW

CLEW

Downdraft

Wood chips, corn cobs

40 kW

Stwalley Engg.

Denmark

Updraft

Hazardous, leather waste

2-15 MW

DTI

Updraft

Straw, wood chips, barks

1-15 MW

VOLUND R&D Center

Downdraft

Wood residues

0.5 MW

Hollesen Engg.

New

Zealand

Downdraft

Wood blocks, chips, coppice willow chips

30 kW

Fluidyne

France

Downdraft

Wood, agricultural residues

100-600 kW

Martezo

UK

Downdraft

Wood chips, hazel nuts, shells, MSW

30 kW

Newcastle University of Technology

Downdraft

Industrial

agricultural wastes

300 kW

Shawton

Engineering

Switzerland

Stratified

Woody and agricultural biomass

50-2500 kW

DASAG

Downdraft

Wood, wood waste

0.25-4 MW

HTV energy

India

Downdraft

Wood chips, rice hulls

100 kg/h

Associated

Engineering

Works

Downdraft

Wood stalks, cobs, shells, rice husk

NA

Ankur Scientific

Energy

Technologies

Belgium

Small scale

Wood chips

160 kW

SRC Gazel

South Africa

Downdraft

Wood blocks, chips, briquettes

30-500 kW

SystBM Johansson gas producers

Finland

BIONEER

Wood chips, straw, RDF

4-5 MW

Ahlstrom

Corporation

Updraft

Pellets, peat

6.4 MW

VTT

The

Netherlands

Downdraft

Rice husk

150 kW

KARA Energy Systems

China

Downdraft

Sawdust

200 kW

Huairou wood equipment

Downdraft

Crop residues

300 kW

Huantai integrate

gas-supply

system

Source: Chopra and Jain, 2007.

Table 16.3 Diameter, superficial velocity and hearth load of different gasifier types

Diameter (m)

Superficial velocity (m/s)

Hearth load (m3/cm2 h)

Imbert gasifier

0.15

2.5

0.9

0.3

0.63

0.23

Biomass Corporation

0.3

0.95

0.34

0.61

0.24

0.09

SERI air/oxygen

0.15

0.28

0.1

0.15

0.24

0.09

Buck Rogers

0.61

0.13

0.05

0.61

0.23

0.08

Syn-Gas Inc.

0.76

1.71

0.62

0.76

1.07

0.39

Source: Reed and Das, 1998.