Как выбрать гостиницу для кошек
14 декабря, 2021
Figure 2 illustrates the high level technologies for producing bioethanol from these various biomass feedstocks. Typically, the common steps for biologically producing bioethanol from different feedstocks are fermentation and distillation. For the first generation (1G) bioethanol production, the sugar extracted from sugar-rich crops and that from starch digestion by amylases or acids is directly fermented to bioethanol. To convert lignocellulosic biomass into second generation (2G) bioethanol, an additional step of pre-treatment is usually required. |
A wide variety of lignocellulosic feedstocks are potentially available for bioethanol production such as wood, grass, agricultural waste and MSW (municipal solid waste). Their physical structures and chemical compositions are different; therefore technologies applied for bioethanol production can be diverse. In addition to the main product bioethanol, coproducts are also usually produced, such as heat and electricity generated by burning lignin-rich residue from fermentation and also, potentially, a wide range of high value — added chemicals like acetic acid, furfural and hemicellulose sugar syrup and the low molecular weight lignin.
General technologies required for biologically producing 2G bioethanol include (1) pretreatment, (2) enzymatic hydrolysis, (3) fermentation, and (4) distillation.
Pre-treatment is applied to enhance the accessibility of enzyme to biomass by increasing available biomass particle surface area for enzyme to attack. This can be achieved by partially removing lignin and/or hemicellulose, changing the structure of biomass fibres to decrease cellulose crystallinity and its degree of polymerization. The current available pretreatment methods can be classified as mechanical, chemical and biological. Table1 summarised some typical pre-treatment methods and their characterisations. Pre-treatment has been viewed as the most expensive step in the biologically production of bioethanol. Therefore, it is important to assess the economic feasibility of the pre-treatment method in addition to its technology performance. More information about each pre-treatment method can be found in Section 5.
Enzymatic hydrolysis is carried out under mild conditions with potentially high sugar yields and relatively low maintenance costs. Nevertheless, major challenges for cost — effective commercialisation remain, such as the high cost of enzymes, the slow rate of enzymatic reaction and potential inhibition by sugar degradation products from pretreatments [48]. In enzymatic hydrolysis, cellulose is hydrolysed by a suite of enzymes, including cellulase and p-glucosidase crudely purified from lignocellulose-degrading fungi such as Trichoderma reesi, Trichoderma viride and Aspergillus niger. Cellulase refers to a class of enzymes including endocellulase breaking internal bonds of cellulose, exocellulase cleaving from the free ends of chains produced by endocellulase to form cellobiose (a dimer of glucose), and cellobiase (p-glucosidase) then hydrolysing cellobiose to produce glucose monomers. In addition, most of cellulase mixtures contain hemicellulase that facilitates hemicellulose hydrolysis to assist with the overall effectiveness of enzymatic hydrolysis.
After the enzymatic hydrolysis, sugar monomers can then be fermented to ethanol by microorganisms (e. g. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Zymomonas mobilis). Fermentation has been commercialised in brewery and food manufacturing for centuries and itself is not a complex and expensive process. The challenges regarding fermentation for the bioethanol industry are: (1) to convert pentose (C5 sugar) which cannot be fermented by the conventional yeast efficiently, and (2) to prevent inhibition caused by sugar degradation products from pretreatments. Research has shown the feasibility of construction and application of genetically engineered yeasts capable of converting both pentose and hexose to ethanol [49]. Further potential lies in using bacteria with the metabolic pathways necessary to ferment all sugars available from lignocellulosic biomass. Z. mobilis has shown to be capable of metabolising 95% of glucose, 80% of xylose and 40% of other sugars in corn stover hydrolysate [50]. Metabolic engineered Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius has demonstrated an ethanol yield of over 90% of theoretical at temperatures in excess of 60 °C [51].
Pre treatment method |
Process and conditions |
Possible changes in biomass |
Disadvantages |
Reference |
Steam explosion |
No agent temperature:160- 260°C,20-50 bar, 2-5 minutes |
Dissolve hemicelluloses Low sugar degradation |
Partially degrade hemicellulose |
[25-27] |
Ammonia fibre explosion (AFEX) |
Ammonia as agent, 6590 °C, 0.5-3 hours |
Change biomass physical structure Enhancing hemicelluloses hydrolysis |
Limited effects on soft and hardwood |
[28, 29] |
SO2/H2SO4 explosion |
SO2 as agent, 160- 220°C, < 2 minutes |
Dissolve hemicelluloses effectively for hardwood and agricultural residues |
Degradation of hemicelluloses, less effective for softwood |
[30, 31] |
CO2 explosion |
CO2 as agent, 35°C, 56.2 bar, 10-60 minutes |
Interrupt crystalline structure of cellulose |
Inefficient for softwood and high capital cost |
[32, 33] |
Hot liquid water |
Water as agent, 190- 230°C, 45 seconds-4 minutes |
Effectively dissolve hemicelluloses Very low degradation |
Water recycling prohibitively expensive |
[34-36] |
Dilute acid |
H2SO4 as agent, over 160°C, 2-10 minutes |
Effectively dissolve hemicelluloses |
Needs neutralisation, significant formation of fermentation inhibitors |
[37-39] |
Alkaline |
NaOH/ Ca(OH)2 /Ammonia as agent, 70-120 °C, 20-60 minutes |
Removal of lignin Low hemicelluloses degradation |
Costs of reagents and wastewater treatment are high |
[40-42] |
Oxidation |
Ca(OH)2+O2/H2O2 as agent, 140 °C, 3 hours |
Removal of lignin Low hemicelluloses degradation |
Costs of reagents and wastewater treatment are high |
[43, 44] |
Organic solvent |
Ethanol as agent, 140- 200°C, 30-150 minutes |
Removal of lignin |
Cost of solvent recovery is high |
[45, 46] |
Ionic liquid |
Ionic liquid as agent, 120°C, 22 hours |
Remove of lignin and hemicellulose |
Costs of reagents and long treatment time |
[47] |
Table 1. Chemical pre-treatment methods for lignocellulosic biomass. |
Bioconversion process configurations, including Separate Hydrolysis and Fermentation (SHF), Simultaneously Saccharification and Fermentation (SSF), Simultaneously Saccharification and Co-Fermentation (SSCF), and Consolidated Bioprocessing (CBP). The SHF has many advantages, such as allowing both enzyme and micro-organisms to operate at their optimum conditions. Also, any accidental failure of enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation would not affect the other steps. Alternatively the enzymatic hydrolysis may also be combined with fermentation and can thus be carried out simultaneously in a same reactor — this being known as the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF). During enzymatic hydrolysis, the cellulases are strongly inhibited by hydrolysis products: glucose and short cellulose chains (‘end-point’ inhibition). SSF can overcome this inhibition by fermenting the glucose to ethanol as soon as it appears in solution. However, ethanol itself inhibits the action of fermenting micro-organisms and cellulase although ethanol accumulation is less inhibitory than high concentrations of hydrolysis products [52]. Nevertheless, SSF operating at the compromised temperature (37-40 °C) has some drawbacks caused by the different optimal temperatures for the action of cellulases (45-50° C) and the growth of microorganisms (typically 28-35 °C). One method to overcome this disadvantage is the utilisation of thermo-tolerant fermenting organisms. SSCF is a promising SSF process where the micro-organism co-ferment pentose and hexose to bioethanol. CBP currently becomes the focus of most research efforts to date; it integrates cellulase production, cellulose hydrolysis and fermentation in one step by using an engineered strain [53]. Many studies have been reported in CBP technologies developments recently [54-56].
Nevertheless, other significant efforts are also required to enable future integrated biorefinery. They include (1) promising process designs to integrate energy consumption and minimise the water footprint (2) producing a range of high value added by products, e. g. power, chemicals, and lignin-derived products etc.