Physical characteristics of biogranules

The shear force imposed in the development of granules in this experiment, in terms of superficial upflow air velocity (i. e. 1.6 cm/s), resulted in the development of biogranules with an average diameter of 2.25 mm. The strong shearing force produced by aeration during the aerobic phase prevents the development of bigger aerobic granules. However, reduction in famine period may also lead to the formation of bigger aerobic granular sizes (Liu and Tay, 2006).

The average settling velocity of the sludge and anaerobic granular sludge used as the seeding were 9.9 ± 0.7 m/h and 42 ± 8 m/h respectively. The settling velocity of the biogranules increased from 17.8 ± 2.6 m/h to 83.6 ± 2.6 m/h at the end of experiment. The average settling velocity of the mature biogranules reached almost 80 ± 7.6 m/h, which was nearly three times greater than the settling velocity of the aerobic granules reported by Zheng et al. (2005).

The increase in settling velocity has given significant impact on the biomass concentration in the reactor. The relationship between the concentration of the MLSS and settling velocity of the granules is shown in Figure 7. Despite the short settling time (5 min), the high settling velocity possessed by the developed biogranules enabled the biogranules to escape from being flushed out during the decanting phase. Such conditions have caused more biogranules to retain in the reactor and resulted in the increase of biomass concentration.

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

The SVI value has also improved from 277 mL/g at the initial stage to 69 mL/g at the mature development of biogranules. This indicates good settling properties of the biogranules, which is favorable in wastewater treatment plant operation. Figure 8 demonstrates the SVI profile along with the settling velocity. As the SVI value improved, the granular settling properties increased from 50 m/h to about 80 m/h. The SVI of biogranules seems to vary depending on the settling time of the reactor system. McSwain et al. (2004) reported the SVI of biogranules improved from 115 ± 36 ml/g to 47 ± 6 ml/g when the settling time decreased from 2 to 10 min. Biogranules developed with anaerobic seeding, showed higher settling velocity and improved SVI.

100

80

60

40

20

0

The granular strength of the biogranules was measured based on the integrity coefficient (IC) defined earlier. The smaller the value of IC, the higher the strength and ability of the biogranules to clump together and being prevented to break due to shear force of the aeration. Figure 9 shows the profile of IC of the developed biogranules as a function of time. The IC reduced as the biogranules developed. The initial value of IC was 30. Then the IC was reduced to about 9 as it reached a mature stage. According to Ghangrekar et al. (2005), biogranules with integrity coefficient of less than 20 were considered high strength granules. The reduction in IC value indicates the increase in the strength of the bond that holds the microorganisms together within the developed biogranules.

During the initial development, the microbes within the biogranules were loosely bounded to each other. At this stage, the biogranules may consist of more cavities causing the biogranules become less dense, as manifested by low settling velocity. As more microbes are linked together, the biogranules increase in size. Under certain selective pressures (i. e. short

settling time, hydrodynamic shear force, starvation of the microbial cell), microbes may produce more extrapolysaccarides (EPS) (Lin et al., 2003; Qin et al., 2004). As reported by Zhang et al. (2007) and Adav and Lee, (2008), the EPS contribute greatly to the strength and the stability of aerobic granules. When microbial cells produce more EPS, they form a cross — linked network and further strengthen the structural integrity of the granules. The cavities within the biogranules will be filled with EPS as it is a major component of the biogranules matrix material. This caused the biogranules to become denser and stronger as shown by their high settling velocity and lower IC value. The physical characteristics of the seed sludge and the matured biogranules are summarized in Table 4. The developed biogranules possess desirable biomass characteristics in the biological wastewater treatment system.

Figure 9. The profile of integrity coefficient representing the granular strength of the biogranules

Characteristics

Seed Sludge

Biogranules

SVI (mL/g)

277

69

Average diameter (mm)

0.02 ± 0.01

2.3 ± 1.0

Average settling velocity (m/h)

9.9 ± 0.7

80 ± 8

IC

92 ± 6

9.4 ± 0.5

MLSS (g/L)

2.9 ± 0.8

7.3 ± 0.9

MLVSS (g/L)

1.9 ± 0.5

5.6 ± 0.8

Table 4. Characteristics of seed sludge and biogranules

The profile of the biomass concentration (i. e. MLSS) after seeding with the anaerobic granules is shown in Figure 10. During the first few days, almost half of the sludge was washed out from the reactor causing a rapid decrease in the biomass concentration. The MLSS reduced from initial concentrations of 5.5 g/L to 2.9 g/L mainly due to the short settling time

used in the cycle (i. e 5 min). During this initial stage, the anaerobic granules were also observed to disintegrate into smaller fragmented biogranules and debris resulted from shear force caused by aeration. These small fragments have poor settling ability and were washed out from the reactor causing an increase of suspended solids concentration in the effluent.

9

8

As the experiment continued, the concentration of the biomass increased and reached 7.3 g MLSS/L on the 66th day. The profile of MLVSS follows the same trend of MLSS, ranging from 1.9 g/L to 5.6 g/L. The mean cell residence time (SRT) also increased from 1.4 days at the initial stage to 8.3 days on the 66th day, indicating the accumulation of the biomass in the reactor. As less biomass was washed out during the decanting period, the increase in SRT is

another manifestation of good settling characteristics resulting from the high settling velocity. Nonetheless, the benefit of high SRT will depend on the goal of the treatment process (Tchobanoglous et al., 2004). The SRT is affected by the settling velocity. The profiles of the settling velocity and the SRT as functions of time are given in Figure 11.