Treatment technology

At present, treatment of textile wastewater mainly involves physical and/or chemical processes. These include coagulation and flocculation (Harrelkas et al., 2009), precipitation (Solmaz et al., 2007), adsorption (Sayed and Ashtoukhy, 2009), membrane filtration and nanofiltration (Miranda et al., 2009), ion exchange (Wu et al., 2008), ultrasonic mineralization (Maezawa et al., 2007) and electrolysis (De Jonge et al., 1996). While these methods are often costly, they remove the pollutants by transferring them from one phase to another. Some of them generate highly concentrated sludge, hence creating disposal problems (Pearce et al., 2003) that may lead to soil contaminations. Excessive use of chemicals in dye treatment creates secondary pollution problems to the environment.

Process

COD (g/L)

BOD (g/L)

TS (g/L)

TDS (g/L)

pH

Color (ADMI)

Desizing

4.6-5.9

1.7-5.2

16.0-32.0

Scouring

8

0.1-2.9

7.6-17.4

10—13

694

Bleaching

6.7-13.5

0.1-1.7

2.3-14.4

4.8-19.5

8.5-9.6

153

Mercerising

1.6

0.05-0.10

0.6-1.9

4.3-4.6

5.5-9.5

Dyeing

1.1-4.6

0.01-1.80

0.5-14.1

0.05

5-10

1450-4750

Bleaching and Dyeing*

0.2-5.5

2.0-3.0

0.1-5.0

2-10

280-2000

*Characterization of textile wastewater in Malaysia (Ahmed et al., 2005; Ibrahim et al., 2009)

Table 1. Characteristics of textile wastewater (Bisschops and Spanjers, 2003; Dos Santos et al., 2006)

Treatment using ozonation, Fenton’s reagent, electrochemical destruction and photocatalysis are some of the emerging techniques reported to have potential use for decolorization (Faouzi et al., 2006; Ay et al., 2009). However, such technologies usually involve complicated procedures and are economically unattainable (Chang and Lin, 2000).

Among the available techniques, the one that can offer effective pollutant removal at a lower cost is the desirable alternative. Of these, biological treatment is the obvious choice due to the relatively low operating cost.

While a conventional aerobic biological process is incapable of treating textile wastewater, studies have shown that the integration of anaerobic and aerobic processes are able to provide complete mineralization of colored substances (Knackmuss, 1996; Melgoza et al., 2004; van der Zee and Villaverde, 2005). It can be done by using either two separate anaerobic and aerobic reactors (Khelifi et al., 2008) or using integrated anaerobic/aerobic treatment in a single reactor (Frijters et al., 2006; Cinar et al., 2008). The wastewater is initially treated under an anaerobic condition followed by an aerobic condition. Under the anaerobic condition, the N=N bond of the azo dyes are cleavaged, leading to the production of amines, the colorless byproducts. This is followed by complete mineralization under the aerobic condition. Different forms of biomass (i. e. suspension, film and granules) have been used in different types of reactor in the studies.