Effect of different treatments on total accumulated temperature

The measured results of the total accumulated temperature of each treatment were shown in table 4-8.

Soil depth cm

Intervaltreatments

A

B

C

D

E

F

1

435.6

438.4

427.5

463.2

526.9

396.1

0

2

408.7

403.9

415.8

430

479.6

401.8

3

418.1

410.2

369.6

431.3

511.8

369.1

Mean

420.8

417.5

404.3

441.5

506.1

389

1

395

380.5

395.6

410

435.7

380.8

5

2

393.1

397.2

386.8

392.4

425.4

377.6

3

380.7

397.4

391.8

405.7

446.5

370.5

Mean

389.6

391.7

391.4

402.7

440.1

374.7

1

356.5

356

343.2

366.4

381.3

350.4

10

2

365.8

367.1

358.5

378.2

407.2

335.7

3

362.8

354.8

359.4

367.2

413

344.4

Mean

361.7

359.3

353.7

370.6

400.5

343.5

1

339.2

332.4

330.5

346.7

370.4

337.1

15

2

348.1

346

346.6

359.8

385.5

342.3

3

342.9

341.3

335.4

348.6

398.8

323.8

Mean

343.4

339.9

337.5

351.7

384.9

334.4

Table 4-8. The total accumulated temperature of each treatment

Analysis of variance of the total accumulated temperature of each treatment was shown in table 4-9.

Soil depth cm

Source

SS

DF

MS

F

P-value

F0.05

Interval

3016.57

2

1508.29

6.3092

0.0169

4.1028

0

Treatment

25517.2

5

5103.44

21.3477

4.84E-05

3.3258

Error

2390.63

10

239.06

Total

30924.4

17

Interval

58.83

2

29.42

0.3999

0.6806

4.1028

5

Treatment

6241.93

5

1248.39

16.9726

0.000133

3.3258

Error

735.53

10

73.55

Total

7036.3

17

Interval

324.96

2

162.48

2.1843

0.1633

4.1028

10

Treatment

5774.55

5

1154.91

15.526

0.000195

3.3258

Error

743.86

10

74.39

Total

6843.37

17

Interval

432.25

2

216.13

4.113

0.0497

4.1028

15

Treatment

5264.62

5

1052.92

20.037

6.42E-05

3.3258

Error

525.47

10

52.55

Total

6222.34

17

Table 4-9. Analysis of variance of the total accumulated temperature of each treatment

Multiple comparisons of the total accumulated temperature of different soil depths among treatments were shown in table 4-10.

Table 4-10 showed that there were significant differences between plastic film and three kinds of biogas fibre residue film, black film and control while the soil depth was 0cm and 10cm. There were significant differences between the black film and control; there were significant differences between A, B treatment of biogas residue fibre film and control; there were no significant differences between C treatment of biogas residue fibre mulch and control; there were significant differences between black film and C treatment of biogas residue fibre film. While the soil depth was 5 cm, there were significant differences between plastic film and three kinds of biogas fibre residue film, black film and control; there were significant differences between A, B treatment of biogas fibre residue film, black film and control. While soil depth was 15 cm, there were significant differences between plastic film and three kinds of biogas fibre residue film, black film and control; there were significant differences between the black film and C treatment of biogas residue fibre film and control.

While the soil depth was 0 cm, 5 cm, 10 cm, the total accumulated temperature of A, B treatment of biogas residue film obviously increased than control, and C did not significantly increase; while the soil depth was 0cm, the total accumulated temperature of A treatment increased 31.8 °С, B increased 28.5 °С, and C increased 15.3°C than control; while the soil depth was 5cm, the total accumulated temperature of A treatment increased 17°C, B increased 17.3C, and C increased 15.2°C than control; while the soil depth was 10cm, the total accumulated temperature of A treatment increased 18.2 °С, B increased 15.8 °С, and C increased 10.2 °С than control. While the soil depth was 15 cm, the total accumulated temperature of three kinds of biogas fibre residue film nearly closed to control, and was less than the black film and plastic film. There was no significant difference between the three kinds of biogas residue fibre film.

0

A

B

C

D

E

F

420.8

417.5 404.3

441.5 506.1

389

31.8*

28.5*

15.3

52.5**

117.1**

85.3**

88.6**

101.8**

64.6**

20.7

24

37.2*

16.5

13.2

3.3

28.13

40.01

A

391.4

17*

48.7**

11.3

1.8

0.3

15.6

22.19

B

391.7

17.3*

48.4**

11

2.1

C

389.6

15.2

50.5**

13.1

D

402.7

28.3*

37.4**

E

440.1

65.7**

F

374.4

A

361.7

18.2*

38.8**

8.9

8

2.4

15.68

22.32

B

359.3

15.8*

41.2**

11.3

5.6

C

353.7

10.2

46.8**

16.9*

10

D

370.6

27.1**

271**

E

400.5

57**

F

343.5

A

343.4

9

41.5**

8.3

5.9

3.5

13.19

18.76

B

339.9

5.5

45**

11.8

2.4

C

337.5

3.1

47.4**

14.2*

D

351.7

17.3*

33.2**

E

384.9

50.5**

F

334.4

Уі — У F

E

Уі — yj Уі — Ус

LSD0.05 LSD0.01

ІУ, — Ув

Notes: The significance of symbols was as same as table 4-4.

Table 4-10. Multiple comparisons of the total accumulated temperature of different soil depths among treatments