Effect of yeast concentration on ethanol fermentation from rape straw

Fig. 3. shows the results of SSF on wet oxidized rape straw with 80 g/L DM content using initial yeast concentrations from 2.0 to 8.2 g/L.

As expected, the rate of fermentation dependants on the concentration of yeast, as there is plenty of sugar monomers present in the medium, which are produced in the pre-hydrolysis step of the SSF. At some point the excess sugar from the prehydrolysis is depleted and the rate of fermentation becomes dependent on the amount of sugar released by hydrolysis

Rape straw

Solid phase

Liquid phas

e

Compound

g/100 g DM

Compound

g/100 g DM

Compound

g/L

Cellulose

32

Cellulose

54

Glucose

1.1

Hemicellulose

16

Xylan

13

Xylose

6.7

Arabinan

1

Arabinose

0.5

Lignin

18

Lignin

23

Acetic acid

0.9

Ash

5

Ash

3

Formic acid

0.9

NCWM

20

NCWM

13

Furfural

0.1

Phenolics

1.3

pH

3.9

Table 1. Components of rape straw before and after the wet oxidation pretreatment resulting in a solid and a liquid phase. *NCWM is none cell wall material

image133

Fig. 3. The amount of ethanol produced on wet oxidized rape straw using 80 g/L DM and yeast concentrations of (2.0 to 8.2) g/L.

(rate of hydrolysis). Since the enzyme loading was the same in all the samples the fermentations produce ethanol at roughly the same rate once the excess sugar has been used.

In experiments with high dry matter content such as 170 g/L the difference between the yeast dependant and the enzyme dependant phase is more pronounced than with low DM content (Fig. 4). The viscosity of the sample changes drastically during SSF since hydrolysis changes insoluble cellulose to soluble glucose. This means that the rate of both the yeasts and the enzymes production increases over time, as the production rate of both the enzymes and the yeast is related to the viscosity of the medium. An explanation can be that a high concentration of dry matter gives higher inhibitor concentrations and a larger yeast concentration can make faster detoxification.

image134

Fig. 4. The amount of ethanol produced during SSF of wet oxidized rape straw using 170 g/L DM and initial yeast concentrations of (2.0 to 8.2) g/L.

Yeast

CO2

Ethanol

Ethanol potential

ECE

g/L

g/L

g/L

g/L

%

170 g/L straw DM

34.9

51.9

67.2

2

32.3

33.8

51.9

65.2

4

30.3

31.7

51.9

61.1

6

33.7

35.3

51.9

68.0

8.2

33.9

35.5

51.9

68.4

80 g/L straw DM

18.4

24.5

75.2

2

16.8

17.6

24.5

71.8

4

17.8

18.6

24.5

76.1

6

17.8

18.6

24.5

76.1

8.2

16.8

17.6

24.5

71.8

Table 2. Ethanol production and ECE (ethanol conversion efficiency) for different DM contents

As shown in table 2, the high DM content result in low ECE% of 67% compared to 75% when using low DM content. This is an essential problem in ethanol production since industrial distillation works best with more than 50 g/L ethanol, which could potentially be achieved with 75% ECE and 220 g/L of rape straw. However, in reality this is a challenge since increased DM contents result in reduced ECE% due to increasing viscosity and difficulties in mixing and higher concentrations of inhibitors. No direct correspondence between the final ECE% and the initial amount of yeast is found in this study. This indicates that the drop in ECE% at high DM can be due to decreasing enzyme performance in high DM pre-hyrolysates of rape straw.

The rate of fermentation is calculated for the time period with the highest fermentation rate and the results are shown in Fig. 5. For 170 g/L DM content that is between 10 and 52 hours, and for 80 g/L DM content it is between 2 and 4 hours. This time period covers the phase

image135

where the excess sugars from the hydrolysis is fermented and the positive feedback effect seen in high DM contents is also expressed. As shown in Fig. 5 generally the maximum rate of fermentation increases as a function of the yeast concentration. The slope coefficient of 80 g/L DM was found by linear regression to be 0.48 h-1 while it was found to be 0.20 h-1 at 170 g/L DM. The amount of yeast therefore contributes strongly to the positive feedback effect as explained in Fig. 4 and in this time period the dependency is also due to the fact that high yeast content can simply ferment the excess sugar from the hydrolysis faster than low contents of yeast.