Pretreatment

A pretreatment step is necessary for the enzymatic hydrolysis process. It is able to remove the lignin layer and to decristallize cellullose so that the hydrolytic enzymes can easily access the biopolymers. The pretreatment is a critical step in the cellulosic bioethanol technology because it affects the quality and the cost of the carbohydrates containing streams (Balat et al., 2008). Pretreatments methods can be classified into different categories: physical, physiochemical, chemical, biological, electrical, or a combination of these (kumar et al., 2009), (Table 3).

On the whole, the final yield of the enzymatic process depends on the combination of several factors: biomass composition, type of pretreatment, dosage and efficiency of the hydrolytic enzymes (Alvira et al., 2010).

The use of enzymes in the hydrolysis of cellulose is more advantageous than use of chemicals, because enzymes are highly specific and can work at mild process conditions. Despite these advantages, the use of enzymes in industrial applications is still limited by several factors: the costs of enzymes isolation and purification are high; the specific activity of enzyme is low compared to the corresponding starch degrading enzymes. As consequence, the process yields increase at raising the enzymatic proteins dosage and the hydrolysis time ( up to 4 days) while, on the contrary, decrease at raising the solids loadings. One typical index used to evaluate the performances of the cellulase preparations during the enzymatic hydrolysis is the conversion rate to say the obtained glucose concentration per time required to achieve it (g glucose/L/h/). Some authors reported conversion rates of softwoods substrates (5%w/ v solids loading) in the range 0.3-1.2 g/L/h (Berlin et al., 2007). In general, compromise conditions are necessary between enzymes dosages and process time to contain the process costs.

In 2001, the cost to produce cellulase enzymes was 3-5$ per gallon of ethanol (0.8-1.32$/liter ethanol), (Novozymes and NREL)[1]. In order to reduce the cost of cellulases for bioethanol production, in 2000 the National Renewable Laboratory (NREL) of USA has started collaborations with Genencor Corporation and Novozymes. In particular, in 2004, Genencor has achieved an estimated cellulase cost in the range $0.10-0.20 per gallon of ethanol (0.03-

Operating

conditions

Advantages

Disadvantages

Physical

Chipping

Grinding

Milling

Room temperature Energy input < 30Kw per ton biomass

Reduces cellulose critallinity

Power consumption higher than inherent biomass energy

Physio-

chemical

Steam

pretreatment

160-260°C (0. 69- 4.83MPa) for 5-15 min

Causes

hemicellulose auto hydrolysis and lignin

transformation; cost-effective for hardwoods and agricultural residues

Destruction of a portion of the xylan fraction; incomplete distruption of the lignin-carboydrate matrix; generation of inhibitory compounds; less effective for softwoods

AFEX

(Ammonia fiber explosion method)

90°C for 30 min.1- 2kg ammonia /kg dry biomass

Increases accessible surface area, removes lignin and hemicellulose;

Do not modify lignin neither hydrolyzes hemicellulose;

ARP (Ammonia recycle percolation method)

150-170°C for 14 min Fluid velocity 1cm/min

Increases accessible surface area, removes lignin and hemicellulose;

Do not modify lignin neither hydrolyzes hemicellulose;

CO2 explosion

4kg CO2/kg fiber at 5.62 Mpa 160 bar for 90 min at 50 °C under supercritical carbon dioxide

Do not produce inhibitors for downstream processes. Increases accessible surface area, does not cause formation of inhibitory compounds

It is not suitable for biomass with high lignin content (such as woods and nut shells) Does not modify lignin neither hydrolyze hemicelluloses

Ozonolysis

Room temperature

Reduce lignin content; does not produce toxic residues

Expensive for the ozone required;

Wet oxidation

148-200°C for 30 min

Efficient removal of lignin; low formation of inhibitors; low energy demand

High cost of oxygen and alkaline catalyst

Chemical

Acid

hydrolysis:

dilute-acid

pretreatment

Type I: T>160°, continuous-flow process for low solid loading 5-10%,)- Type II: T<160°C, batch process for high solid loadings (10-40%)

Hydrolyzes hemicellulose to xylose and other sugar; alters lignin structure

Equipment corrosion; formation of toxic substances

Operating

conditions

Advantages

Disadvantages

Alkaline

hydrolysis

Low temperature; Long time high. Concentration of the base; For soybean straw: ammonia liquor (10%) for 24 h at room temperature

Removes

hemicelluloses and lignin; increases accessible surface area

Residual salts in biomass

Organosolv

150-200 °C with or without addition of catalysts (oxalic, salicylic,

acetylsalicylic acid)

Hydrolyzes lignin and hemicelluloses

High costs due to the solvents recovery

Biological

Several fungi (brown-, white — and soft-rot fungi

Degrades lignin and hemicelluloses; low energy requirements

Slow hydrolysis rates

Electrical

Pulsed

electrical field in the range of 5-20 kV/cm,

~2000 pulses of 8 kV/cm

Ambient

conditions; disrupts plant cells; simple equipment

Process needs more research

Table 3. Methods for biomass lignocellulosic pretreatment (Kumar et al., 2009)

0. 05$/liter ethanol) in NREL’s cost model (Genencor, 2004)[2]. Similarly, collaboration between Novozymes and NREL has yielded a cost reduction in the range $0.10-0.18 per gallon of ethanol (0.03-0.047$/liter ethanol), a 30-fold reduction since 2001 (Mathew et al., 2008).

Unlike the acid hydrolysis, the enzymatic hydrolysis, still has not reached the industrial scale. Only few plants are available worldwide to investigate the process (pretreatment and bioconversion) at demo scale. More recently, the steam explosion pretreatment, investigated for several years in Italy at the ENEA research Center of Trisaia (De Bari et al., 2002, 2007), is now going to be developed at industrial scale thanks to investments from the Italian Mossi & Ghisolfi Group.