Как выбрать гостиницу для кошек
14 декабря, 2021
Chemical hydrolysis involves exposure of lignocellulosic materials to a chemical for a period of time, at a specific temperature, and results in sugar monomers from cellulose and hemicellulose polymers. Acids are predominantly applied in chemical hydrolyses. Sulfuric acid is the most investigated acid, although other acids such as hydrochloric acid (HCl) have also been used. Acid hydrolyses can be divided into two groups: concentrated-acid hydrolysis and dilute-acid hydrolysis [18].
Concentrated-acid hydrolysis. Hydrolysis of lignocellulose by concentrated sulfuric or hydrochloric acids is a relatively old process. Concentrated-acid processes are generally reported to give higher sugar and ethanol yield, compared to dilute-acid processes. Furthermore, they do not need a very high pressure and temperature. Although this is a successful method for cellulose hydrolysis, concentrated acids are toxic, corrosive, and hazardous, and these acids require reactors that are highly resistant to corrosion. High investment and maintenance costs have greatly reduced the commercial potential for this process. In addition, the concentrated acid must be recovered after hydrolysis to make the process economically feasible. Furthermore, the environmental impact strongly limits the application of hydrochloric acid [12, 15].
Dilute-acid hydrolysis. Dilute-sulfuric acid hydrolysis is a favorable method for either the pretreatment before enzymatic hydrolysis or the conversion of lignocellulose to sugars. This pretreatment method gives high reaction rates and significantly improves enzymatic hydrolysis.
Depending on the substrate used and the conditions applied, up to 95% of the hemicellulosic sugars can be recovered by dilute-acid hydrolysis from the lignocellulosic feedstock [2, 13]. Of all dilute-acid processes, the processes using sulfuric acid have been the most extensively studied. Sulfuric acid is typically used in 0.5-1.0% concentration. However, the time and temperature of the process can be varied. It is common to use one of the following conditions in dilute-acid hydrolysis:
■ Mild conditions, i. e., low pressure and long retention time
■ Severe conditions, i. e., high pressure and short retention time
In dilute-acid hydrolysis, the hemicellulose fraction is depolymerized at temperatures lower than the cellulose fraction. If higher temperature or longer retention times are applied, the monosaccharides formed will be further hydrolyzed to other compounds. It is therefore suggested that the hydrolysis process be carried out in at least two stages. The first stage is carried out at relatively milder conditions during which the hemicellulose fraction is hydrolyzed, and a second stage can be carried out by enzymatic hydrolysis or dilute-acid hydrolysis, at higher temperatures, during which the cellulose is hydrolyzed [13]. These first and second stages are sometimes called “pretreatment” and “hydrolysis,” respectively.
Hydrolyzates of first-stage dilute-acid hydrolysis usually consist of hemicellulosic carbohydrates. The dominant sugar in the first-stage hydrolyzate of hardwoods (such as alder, aspen, and birch) and most agricultural residues such as straw is xylose, whereas first-stage hydrolyzates of softwoods (e. g., pine and spruce) predominantly contain mannose. However, the dominant sugar in the second-stage hydrolyzate of all lignocellulosic materials, either by enzymatic or dilute-acid hydrolysis, is glucose, which originates from cellulose.
Detoxification of acid hydrolyzates. In addition to sugars, several by-products are formed or released in the acid hydrolysis process. The most important by-products are carboxylic acids, furans, and phenolic compounds (see Fig. 3.6).
‘ Mannan—► Mannose —► HMF ► Acids
Xylan—- ► Xylose— ►Furfural—► Acids
I Glucan — ► Glucose— ► HMF — ► Acids
——————— ► Phenolic Compounds
Acetyl groups————————— ► Acetic acid
Figure 3.6 Formation of inhibitory compounds from lignocellulosic materials during acid hydrolysis.
Acetic acid, formic acid, and levulinic acid are the most common carboxylic acids found in hydrolyzates. Acetic acid is mainly formed from acetylated sugars in the hemicellulose, which are cleaved off already at mild hydrolysis conditions. Since the acid is not further hydrolyzed, formation of acetic acid is dependent on the temperature and pressure of dilute-acid hydrolysis, until the acetyl groups are fully hydrolyzed. Therefore, the acetic acid yield in the hydrolysis does not significantly depend on the severity of the hydrolysis process [13, 19].
Furfural and HMF are the only furans usually found in hydrolyzates in significant amounts. They are hydrolysis products of pentoses and hexoses, respectively [13]. Formation of these by-products is affected by the type and size of lignocellulose, as well as hydrolysis variables such as acid type and concentration, pressure and temperature, and the retention time.
A large number of phenolic compounds have been found in hydrolyzates. However, reported concentrations are normally a few milligrams per liter. This could be due to the low water solubility of many of the phenolic compounds, or a limited degradation of lignin during the hydrolysis process. Vanillin, syringaldehyde, hydroxybenzaldehyde, phenol, vanillic acid, and 4-hydroxybenzoic acid are among the phenolic compounds found in dilute- acid hydrolyzates [18].
Biological (e. g., using enzymes peroxidase and laccase), physical (e. g., evaporation of volatile fraction and extraction of nonvolatile fraction by diethyl ether), and chemical (e. g., alkali treatment) methods have been employed for detoxification of lignocellulosic hydrolyzates [20, 21].
Detoxification of lignocellulosic hydrolyzates by overliming is a common method used to improve fermentability [22-25]. In this method, Ca(OH)2 is added to hydrolyzates to increase the pH (up to 9-12) and keep this condition for a period of time (from 15 min up to several days), followed by decreasing the pH to 5 or 5.5. Recently, it has been found that time, pH, and temperature of overliming are the effective parameters in detoxification [26]. However, the drawback of this treatment is that part of the sugar is also degraded during the overliming process. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize the process to achieve a fermentable hydrolyzate without any loss of the sugar [21, 26].
Crop description. J. curcas—commonly known as pourghere, ratanjyot, Barbados nut, physic nut, parvaranda, taua taua, tartago, saboo dam, jarak butte, or awla—belongs to the family Euphorbiaceae and grows in hot, dry, tropical climates (see Fig. 4.6). It originated from South America and is now found worldwide in tropical countries. It grows wild especially in West Africa, and is grown commercially in the Cape Verde Islands and Malagasy Republic. The tree reaches a height of 8 m and is a tough, drought-resistant plant that bears oil-rich seeds prolifically under optimum growing conditions [75]. The seeds contain about 55% oil [76]. The oil contains a toxic substance, curcasin, which has a strong purging effect. Major fatty acid composition consists of myristic acid (0-0.5%), palmitic acid (12-17%), stearic acid (5-6%), oleic acid (37-63%), and linoleic acid (19-40%) [77].
Main uses. It has been cultivated as a drought-resistant plant in marginal areas to prevent soil erosion. The oil has been commercially used
Figure 4.6 Jatropha curcas. (Photo courtesy of Piet Van Wyk and EcoPort [www. ecoport. org].)
for lighting purposes, as lacquer, in soap manufacture, and as a textile lubricant. It is also used for medicinal purposes for its strong purging effect. The leaves are used in the treatment of malaria. Products useful as plasticizer, hide softeners, and hydraulic fluid have been obtained after halogenation [75]. The wood is used for fuel. The cake, after oil extraction, cannot be used for animal feed due to its toxicity, but is a good organic fertilizer. The wood is very flexible and is used for basket making. A water extract of the whole plant has molluscicide effects against various types of snail, as well as insecticidal properties [77].
Recently, there has been considerable interest in the use of the oil in small diesel engines. This oil has great potential for biodiesel production [78-80]. Foidl et al. transesterified J. curcas oil, using a solution of KOH (0.53 mol) in methanol (10.34 mol) and stirring at 30oC for 30 min [81]. The ester fuel has high quality and meets the existing standards for vegetable-oil-derived fuels. Some researchers have proposed the use of immobilized enzymes such as Chromobacterium viscosum, Candida rugosa, and Porcine pancreas as a catalyst [82, 83]. Modi et al. have proposed the use of propan-2-ol as an acyl acceptor for immobilized Candida antarctica lipase B. Best results have been obtained by means of 10% Novozym-435 based on oil weight, with a alcohol-oil molar ratio of 4:1 at 50oC for 8 h [84]. Zhu et al. have proposed the use of a heterogeneous solid superbase catalyst (catalyst dosage of 1.5%) and calcium oxide, at 70oC for 2.5 h, with a methanol-oil molar ratio of 9:1 to produce biodiesel [85]. The lubrication properties of this biodiesel have also been taken into consideration [51].
Different techniques adopted for converting vegetable oils to biodiesel are (a) degumming of vegetable oils, (b) transesterification by acid or alkali, and (c) enzymatic transesterification.
5.2.1 Degumming of vegetable oils
Degumming is an economical chemical process involving acid treatment to improve the viscosity and cetane number up to a certain limit so that the blends of nonedible oils with diesel can be used satisfactorily in a diesel engine. It is a very simple process by which the gum of the vegetable oil is removed to decrease the viscosity of oil by using an appropriate acid that can be optimized for reduction in viscosity. The quantity of acid and the duration of the process are very important to obtain optimum results. Compared to transesterification, the process of degum — ming is simple, very easy, and less costly, and the reduction in viscosity of vegetable oil is very small.
Nag et al. [25] degummed karanja, putranjiva, and jatropha oils by phosphoric acid treatment. Before degumming the oils, the fuel properties of three oils have been measured and compared with diesel (Table 6.1). Acid concentrations of 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, and 5% were used at 40°C with vigorous stirring. The stirring was continued for 10 min after adding the acid. After stirring, the mixtures were held for 1 week to complete the reactions and to settle the gum materials. Then the mixtures were filtered through a packed bed filled with charred sawdust. Viscosities of the filtrate were then measured.
Performance and emission measurement. After studying the properties of the jatropha, karanja, and putranjiva oils, they were degummed. In this context, the Ricardo variable-compression engine (Ricardo & Co. Engineers Ltd., England, single cylinder, 3-in bore, 35/8 in stroke) was run with 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% blends of degummed karanja, jatropha, and putranjiva oils with diesel at different loads (0-2.7 kW) and different timings (45°, 40°, 35°, and 30° bTDC [before top dead center]). To measure emissions, an automotive exhaust monitor (model PEA205) and smoke meter (model OMS103, Indus Scientific Pvt. Ltd., India) were used.
Degumming by acid treatment lowers the viscosity. Viscosities of karanja, jatropha, and putranjiva oils degummed at 40°C and at various acid concentrations are shown in Fig. 6.1. Karanja oil with 4% acid treatment had the lowest viscosity, whereas jatropha and putranjiva oils both had the lowest viscosities with 1% acid treatment.
Effect of timing. By observing the performance data at various timings (45°, 40°, and 35° bTDC) in Fig. 6.2, it was concluded that at 45° bTDC timing, the nonedible karanja, jatropha, and putranjiva oils gave the highest yields, whereas at 40° bTDC timing, diesel gave the highest yield. That may have been due to the different ignition temperatures of the nonedible oils from diesel.
TABLE 6.1 Fuel Properties of Three Nonedible Oils and Diesel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance of various blends. Performances of blends of degummed vegetable oil with diesel are shown in Figs. 6.3 and 6.4. The 20% blends of jatropha, karanja, and putranjiva oils with diesel gave quite satisfactory performance related to BSFC and brake thermal efficiency (^bt). Beyond the 20% blends, the cetane numbers and viscosities of the blends were not so effective.
Comparison of the performance of blends. As per Figs. 6.5 and 6.6, engine performance using jatropha and karanja oils was better than diesel but the use of putranjiva oil gave reverse results at all loads, although the results were more or less the same. Degummed karanja oil blends gave better performance, but at high loads, the performance of jatropha oil blends was better in comparison to the performance of karanja oil blends. The performance data showed that all three vegetable oils could be used as alternative fuels for diesel engines.
Effect of loads on emissions of vegetable oil blends and comparison. As per
Figs. 6.7 and 6.8, it is interesting to note that for the karanja, jatropha, and putranjiva oils, in every case, smoke and particulates decreased, which was very favorable in terms of their environmental impact on human beings. The rate of increase in smoke and particulate generation with the load of jatropha oil, in comparison to karanja and putranjiva
Diesel
IWWl 10% blend 20% blend 30% blend
Figure 6.4 Brake thermal efficiency versus brake horsepower of vegetable oil and diesel blends at 1200 rpm, 45° bTDC, 20 compression ratio, and 1.4-kW brake power. |
Figure 6.5 Brake specific fuel consumption versus brake power of diesel, 20% karanja oil, jatropha oil, and putranjiva oil blends at 1200 rpm, 45° bTDC, and 20 compression ratios. |
|
|
Brake power (kW) Figure 6.8 Particulates versus brake power of diesel, 20% karanja oil, 20% jatropha oil and 20% putranjiva oil blends at 1200 rpm, 45° bTDC, and 20 compression ratio. |
oils, was very low. It is very interesting to observe that although the particulates and smoke for all the oils decreased, jatropha oil blends gave the highest reduction.
In Figs. 6.9 and 6.10, the CO, CO2, NOx, and HC (hydrocarbon) emissions for the three nonedible oils were less in comparison to diesel at high loads. However, at low loads, emissions from the nonedible oils are almost parallel to diesel. Because of the higher ignition temperature of nonedible oils than diesel, the better combustion of these oils gave less exhaust emissions.
Thus, degumming is an economic chemical process for a 20% blend of karanja, jatropha, and putranjiva oils with diesel to have very satisfactory results. The degumming method, therefore, offers a potential low-cost method with simple technology for producing an alternative fuel for CI engines. Out of the three nonedible oils, jatropha oil was the most promising to yield good performance and emissions at high loads in all respects. Comparing CO, CO2, NOx, HC, smoke, and particulate emissions from using the three nonedible oils, jatropha oil was very encouraging (see Fig. 6.11). Considering the above-mentioned points, it can be concluded that the diesel engine can be run very satisfactorily using a 20% blend of vegetable oil with diesel at 45° bTDC, 1200 rpm, and 20 compression ratios. Any diesel engine can be operated with a 20% blend
Figure 6.9 Nitrogen oxide versus brake power of diesel, 20% karanja oil, 20% jatropha oil, and 20% putranjiva oil blends at 1200 rpm, 45° bTDC, and 20 compression ratio. |
Figure 6.10 Unburnt hydrocarbon versus brake power of diesel, 20% karanja oil, 20% jatropha oil, and 20% putranjiva oil blends at 1200 rpm, 45° bTDC, and 20 compression ratio. |
Figure 6.11 Carbon monoxide versus brake power of diesel, 20% karanja oil, 20% jatropha oil, and 20% putranjiva oil blends at 1200 rpm, 45° bTDC, and 20 compression ratio. |
of degummed vegetable oils as a prime mover for agriculture purposes without any modification of the engine.
The chemical nature of conversion products depends both on the structure or type of the zeolite used and the reaction temperatures, because restructuring occurs at the inner surface, which acts as a reaction vessel at the molecular scale. Specific reactions depend on the diameters of pores, the resident time of molecules within the pores or channels and voids of the microporous zeolite, and the temperature. The penetration of lipids into a zeolite is depicted in Fig. 8.5. The scheme is based on [22].
O
II C H
‘ C—— C17H35
HC O C C17H35
O
H2C ^-C^
O C17H35
O
Diffusion
Figure 8.5 Scheme of restructuring triglycerides with shape — selective H-ZSM-5 to aromatic hydrocarbons.
To demonstrate this influence of catalysts and reaction temperature on yields and products, Table 8.4 considers a shape-selective zeolite type H-ZSM-5, commercially available as Pentasil, PZ-2/50H, and Y — zeolite (DAY-Wessalith). The physical characteristics of oils formed from the conversion of animal fat (rendering plant) are depicted [56]. Yields are between 30% and 70%, depending on the type of zeolite and temperature. Net calorific values are in the range of 40 MJ/kg compared to
TABLE 8.4 Yields and Physical Characteristics of Hydrocarbons from Catalytic Conversion of Animal Fat Using Zeolite Types H-ZSM-5 (Pentasil, PZ-2/50H) and DAY-Wessalith at Different Temperatures
|
35 MJ/kg of animal fat. All reaction products show relatively low viscosity and densities.
Products at T = 400°C. Again, the chemical nature of products formed from animal fat was analyzed by spectroscopic methods (see Fig. 8.6). The IR spectrum reveals the hydrocarbon nature of products. The strong C-H stretching vibrations (frequencies) at 2900 cm-1 is characteristic for alkanes. Functional groups are widely missing. The comparison to diesel from a commercial gas filling station (imprinted spectrum) shows a similar pattern [37].
Proton resonance spectroscopy depicts the chemical environment of protons in the product formed from the conversion of animal fat. Figure 8.7 shows the dominance of aliphatic protons at chemical shifts of 0.9-2.25 ppm. Aromatic protons absorb at 6.5-8 ppm. The inspection of the ratio of the integral of absorptions reveals 5% aromatics for catalysis at T = 450oC. This is also reflected in the 13C-NMR spectrogram (see Fig. 8.8). However, with increasing temperature in the catalytic bed, the content aromatic alkylbenzenes increase.
Using 13C-NMR spectroscopy in-depth mode (see Fig. 8.9), negative signals at 30-20 ppm are characteristic for CH2-groups. The intensity indicates the presence of long-chain hydrocarbons. Peaks between 140 and 120 ppm denote carbon atoms of aromatic systems. The low intensity reflects the low content. Obviously, catalytic cracking over a Y — zeolite widely preserves hydrocarbon moiety in vegetable oil.
|
|
|
|
|||
|
These spectroscopic findings are confirmed by gas chromatography (GC) [56]. Pyrolyzates (see Fig. 8.10) and commercial diesel (see Fig. 8.11) have a similar GC pattern. However, crude conversion products contain more volatile hydrocarbons.
GC separation on an OV101 capillary [column: 20 m X 0.3 mm, split 1:25; temperature program: 25°C (2 min), 4°C/min to 320°C] reveals double peaks in more detail (see Fig. 8.12). The first peak is for the alkene with a double bond of a given C number. The second peak is for the alkane having the same C number.
|
||
|
||
You may use these hydrocarbons as a base for biofuels. However, there are markets for certain fractions of this hydrocarbon mixture. For example, the C-12 to C-18 fraction is a raw material widely used for bulk commodities. As mineral oil prices increase, it is becoming more financially viable to produce chemical feedstock for commodities and specialities from wastes. Wastes are an energy and carbon source of the future.
Products at T = 550°C. For a given H-ZSM-5-zeolite, the nature of conversion products of lipids (animal fat) shifts to more aromatic compounds as the temperature increases. This is demonstrated by different NMR findings [56] for animal fat as a substrate at a reaction temperature of T = 550°C (see Figs. 8.13 through 8.15). Especially, DEPT-135 13C-NMR pattern of oil from catalytic conversion of animal fat at 550°C shows the dominance of aromatic protons and a very low amount of CH2 groups. Chromatographic separation revealed alkylbenzenes (especially 1,3,5-trimethybenzene) as main products [38].
Figure 8.13 1H-NMR spectrogram of hydrocarbons from animal fat at T = 550°C with the commercial catalyst H-ZSM-5 (Pentasil, PZ-2/50H). |
Figure 8.14 13C-NMR spectrogram of hydrocarbons from animal fat at T = 550°C with the commercial catalyst H-ZSM-5 (Pentasil, PZ-2/50H). |
Heating oil and a conversion product from animal fat have been used in a commercial burner (Buderus, Germany). Both oils resulted in emissions within legal limits (see Table 8.5).
A straightforward approach to apply vegetable oil in the most-talked — about biomass-to-liquid-fuel scheme is to use it as a co-substrate in mineral oil refineries. Advantages are low investments for peripheral facilities such as loading and storage and use of an existing infrastructure for distribution and marketing. The processing of rapeseed oil as a feed component in a hydrocracker was described in 1990 [39]. The results are summarized in Table 8.6.
It is worth mentioning that rapeseed oil is converted in the hydrotreatment step to paraffins. The oxygen content of the vegetable oil causes an increased consumption of hydrogen to form water. Changes in quality
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 ppm Figure 8.15 DEPT-135 13C-NMR spectrogram of hydrocarbons from animal fat at T = 550°C with the commercial catalyst H-ZSM-5 (Pentasil, PZ-2/50H). |
TABLE 8.5 Comparison of Combustion Parameters: Heating Oil versus Oil Derived from Y-Catalytic Conversion of Animal Fat (AF) at T = 400°C
*DIN 51 603 +TA Luft *1. BImSchV d/l: detection limit |
occur in the middle distillate. A lower density and a higher cetane number are a quality-enhancing advantage. A drawback is the susceptibility to freezing point of the fuel. This kind of cold flow behavior would make its use in winter impossible unless special additives are supplemented [40].
Many or most organic cellulosic matter, after proper mechanical treatment (homogenizing), can be put to microbial conversion for (a) bio — methanation and/or (b) hydrogen production.
1. Biomethanation can utilize human or animal excreta as well as mixed green/organic wastes. This part has been discussed earlier in Secs. 1.12 and 1.13.
2. Hydrogen production is discussed hereafter.
Biohydrogen. Major routes are
1. Enzymatic (partly microbial) through microbial routes
2. Klebsiella and Clostridium groups of microbes
3. Different cyanobacteria (blue-green algae)
4. Various photosynthetic bacteria
5. Many aerobes, i. e., bacilli and alkaligenes
6. Facultative groups, i. e., enterobacters, and coli forms
7. Various anaerobes, i. e., rumens, methanogenic, methylotropes, and clostridia
Enzymatic. Glucose dehydrogenase oxidizes glucose into gluconic acid and NADPH, which helps the reduction of H+ by hydrogenase. Glucose dehydrogenase and hydrogenase are purified from Thermoplasma aci- dophylium and Pyrococcus furiosus (optimal growth at 59°C and 100°C, respectively) (Woodward).
Based on metabolic patterns, the microbial systems may be of four types:
1. Photosynthetic microbes evolving H2 mediated through NADPH (Nicotine Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate [Coenzyme II-reduced]) by photoenergy.
2. Cytochrome systems operating in facultative anaerobes that convert mainly formates to H2.
3. Cytochrome containing strict anaerobe, Desulfovibrio desulfuricans.
4. Clostridia, micrococci, methanobacteria, and others, without cytochrome, anaerobic heterotrophs.
Klebsiella oxytocae. ATCC (American Type Culture Collection) 13182 can convert formates to H2 (100%), but only 2 moles of H2 for each mole of glucose (5%). C. butyricum can convert glycerol to 1,3-propanediol, butyric acid, 2,3-butanediol, formic acid, and CO2 and H2. Klebsiella pneumoniae can convert glycerol into 1,3-propanediol, acetic acid, formic acid, and CO2 and H2. The presence of acetate enhances the production of butyrates and H2, and less propanediol.
Before discussing cyanobacteria and photosynthetic bacteria, we should review the basic reactions involved in photosynthesis, i. e., steps in so-called photophosporylation:
H2O + NADP+ + PO4 + ADP—^ O2 + NADPH + H+ + ATP
CO2 + NADPH + H+ + ATP———— ► (HCOH)n + NADP+ + ADP + PO4
+hv
Aerobic: 6CO2 + 6H2O ———- * C6H12O6 + 6O2
+hv
Anaerobic: Isopropanol or H2S + CO2————- ► Acetone or S +
(CH2O)n H2O
Cyanobacteria. Popularly known as blue-green algae, and justifiably so (they consume CO2 and evolve O2), they are bacteria (absence of nuclei, mitochondria, chloroplasts, etc.) as well as algae.
Cyanobacteria are oxygenic photoautotrophs, possessing photo I and II systems. Cyanobacteria have been well studied, and the details of their physiology and biochemistry are available in reviews and books. They are held by many scientists as potential sources of chemicals, biochemicals, food, feed, and fuel. Most of them are molecular nitrogen fixers and possess a nitrogenase system for H2 production. They are found to be symbiotic to cycads, lichens, and so forth. Some are heterocystous, lacking photolysis of water, and produce H2 through the nitro — genase step (when N2 is low). The nonheterocystous species produce H2 at higher efficiency at low N2 and O2 concentrations. Some of the species favor anoxic and dark conditions, but with the presence of organic substrates. They may even use sulfides as a source of electrons under an anaerobic environment. They are highly adaptable to a changing environment and are widely found in salty or sweet water, deserts, hot springs (up to 75°C), as well as Antarctica. Some heterocystous Anabaena exhibit H2 production in an atmosphere of argon and absence of molecular nitrogen. This was the clue to the knowledge that the enzyme nitrogenase, the main biocatalyst for molecular nitrogen fixation, is present in cyanobacteria and is the key route of H2 production:
N2 + 8H+ + 8e~ + 12ATP ^ 2NH3 + H2 + 12ADP + 12Pi
A “reversible hydrogenase” (in photolysis of water, 2H2O ^ 2H2 + O2), is present in both heterocyst and vegetative cells and produces H2 at a lower rate than a nitrogenase. An “uptake hydrogenase” also operates (minor) connected to cytochrome chain, providing both H+ and electrons. H2 evolution is common, but the photolytic O2 is inhibitory to nitrogenases, which is protected by other biochemical and structural alternatives existing in heterocysts.
Large amounts of ATP, which is required for the reaction are generated in the event of photosynthesis and respiration. The electron (reduc — tant) supply in the nitrogenase equation comes from metabolites, i. e., amino acids, mainly from carbohydrates (maltose, glucose, fructose, other pentoses, tetroses, etc.), produced and stored in the vegetative cells through photo I and II systems.
Nitrogenase Co II, i. e., NADPH (gained through the pentose phosphate route) happens to be an electron donor through NADP oxidoreductase/ ferredoxin or flovodoxin. Other electron-supplying batteries are also envisaged.
1. Through uptake hydrogenase-ferredoxin (photoactivated)
2. Through pyruvate-ferredoxin oxidoreductase
3. Reduced ferredoxin from isocitrate dehydrogenase
4. NADH generated in the glycolytic route
Under anaerobic or low aerobic conditions, nitrogenase activity may exist in vegetative cells, but H2 generation is of poor order.
Photosynthetic bacteria. Hydrogen production is guided by the surplus of ATP and reductant organic metabolites (carbon sources from the
Krebs cycle) and reduced nitrogen sources (glutamate/aspartate). Interactions of hydrogenase and nitrogenase may be complementary or competitive in different species or mutants. Nitrogenase (Mo, Ni, or Fe) also with mixed isozymes are reported. Some mutants liberate H2 more efficiently, utilizing DL-malate, D-malate, and L-lactate. Photoautotrophic growth is found to be less efficient in producing H2 than photoheterotrophic growth with limited nitrogen in nutrients. Normally, in photosynthetic bacteria, hydrogenase utilizes the hydrogen as a reductant for CO2 fixation and also for fixing molecular nitrogen. Nitrogenase reduces molecular nitrogen, along with the production of molecular hydrogen at the expense of almost six stoichiometric equivalents of ATP. This means that concurrent nitrogenase activity during photosynthesis competitively consumes the ATP that is produced and lowers the CO2-fixing efficiency.
Rhodospirillum and Rhodopseudomonas grow aerobically in the dark. But Rhodospirillum rubrum growing on glutamate (a nitrogen source) exhibit good hydrogen release during photosynthesis. Quantitative production of hydrogen has also been observed, growing on acetate, succinate, fumarate, and malate, by photosynthesis, initially in the presence of limited ammonium salts.
In Rhodopsuedomonas acidophilla, hydrogenase and nitrogenase are genetically linked. Several species of Rhodospirillaceae can perform nonnitrogenase-mediated hydrogen production in the absence of light, using glucose and organic acids including formates. Different strains of Rhodopseudomonas gelatinus and Rhodobacter sphaerolides exhibit highly efficient production of hydrogen [90 pL/(h • mg) cell] grown in a glutamate—malate medium.
In some cultures of Rhodopseudomonas capsulata, R. rubrum, and Rhodomicrobium vannielli, replacement of glutamate by N2 gas improved productivity of H2 (760 mL/d, 10 days) decreasing a little on aging. The model of a nozzle loop bioreactor, with immobilized R. rubrum KS—301 in calcium alginate, initial glucose concentration of 5.4 g/L, 70 h at 30°C, showed production of hydrogen 91 mL/h (dilution rate of 0.4 mL/h). Improvement was suggested by using an agar gel for immobilization.
Aerobes.
1. Bacillus licheniformis isolated from cattle dung showed production of H2 in mixed culture media. Immobilized on brick dust, the aerobe maintained H2 production for about 2 months in a continuous system, with an average bioconversion ratio of 1.5 mole of H2 per mol of glucose.
2. Alcaligenes eutrophus, when grown on gluconates or fructose anaerobically, produces H2. Hydrogenase directly reduces the coenzyme using hydrogen, and the excess hydrogen is spilled out. Higher concentration of formate reduced hydrogen production.
HCOOH ^ CO2 + H2
Facultative anaerobes.
1. Enterobacter: Enterobacter aerogenes, as an example, can use varied and mixed nutrients, i. e., glucose, fructose, galactose, mannose, peptones, and salts (pH 4.0, 40°C); and may show activity for about a month in a continuous culture; evolution of hydrogen was about 120 mL/h/L of medium; 0.8 mol/mol of glucose. Accumulation of acetic, lactic, or succinic acids is likely to cause antimetabolic suppression in older cultures.
2. Escherichia coli: Anaerobically, it can use formate to produce CO2 and H2. Carbohydrates as nutrient sources usually end up with mixed products, i. e., ethanol, acetate, hydrogen, formate, carbon dioxide and succinate.
Various anaerobes.
1. Ruminococcus albus mostly converts cellulose to CO2, H2, HCOOH, C2H5OH, CH3, and COOH. Pyruvatelyase may be functional in the production of H2 (237 mol/mol of glucose). Further details are not available.
2. P. furiosus (thermophilic archeon) possesses nickel-containing hydro — genase and produces hydrogen using carbohydrate and peptone, at 100°C. The metabolic system seems to be uncommon to those of non — thermophiles.
3. Methanobacterium (Methanotrix) soehngenii (methanogens) can grow on acetate and salts media, but can split formate into hydrogen and carbon dioxide. M. barkeri, in the presence of bromoethane sulphonate, has suppressed methane production; instead, hydrogen, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and water were produced.
4. Methylomonas albus BG8 and Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b (methylotrophs) used various substrates, i. e., methane, methanol, formaldehyde, formate, pyruvate, and so forth. But formate was found to be most useful for production of hydrogen under anaerobic conditions.
5. C. butyricum, C. welchii, C. pasturianum, C. beljerinscki, and so forth are very efficient in utilizing different carbohydrate sources and even effluents to produce hydrogen (see Fig. 1.14). Immobilization of these cells has also been successful
Removal of or reducing concentrations of either CO2 or H2 or the combination of both is likely to favor a forward reaction, i. e., to improve production of H2. Attempts to remove CO2 by collecting the evolved gases through 25% (w) NaOH solution, using E. aerogenes (E 82005), showed better production of H2, which improved further by enriching nitrogenous nutrients in the culture media—from 0.52 moles of H2 per mole of glucose, increased to 1.58 moles [9].
Similar attempts are made using E. cloacae and reducing the partial pressure of H2 during the production of gases, by reducing the operating pressure of the reactor and simultaneous removal of CO2 [through 30% (w/v) KOH], maintaining an anoxic condition by flushing Ar at the onset [10]; by reducing the operating pressure to 0.5 atm, the molar ratio of H2 yield per mole of substrate doubled (1.9-3.9). Other technical and economic benefits were also cited. There are other similar claims of improved biohydrogen production [11], using altered nutrients (20 g of glucose, 5 g of yeast extract, and 5 g/L of tryptone) and different mutants of E. aerogenes HU-101. HU-101 and mutants A1, HZ3, and AAY, respectively yielded 52.5, 78, 80, and 101.5 mmol of hydrogen per liter of media.
In batch processes, all nutrients required for fermentation are present in the medium prior to cultivation. Batch technology had been preferred in the past due to the ease of operation, low cost of controlling and monitoring system, low requirements for complete sterilization, use of unskilled labor, low risk of financial loss, and easy management of feedstocks. However, overall productivity of the process is very low, because of long turnaround times and an initial lag phase [9].
In order to improve traditional batch processes, cell recycling and application of several fermentors have been used. Reuse of produced cells can increase productivity of the process. Application of several fermentors operated at staggered intervals can provide a continuous feed to the distillation system. One of the successful batch methods applied for industrial production of ethanol is Melle-Boinot fermentation. This process achieves a reduced fermentation time and increased yield by recycling yeast and applying several fermentors operated at staggered intervals. In this method, yeast cells from previous fermentation are separated from the media by centrifugation and up to 80% are recycled [9, 68]. Instead of centrifugation, the cells can be filtered, followed by the separation of yeast from the filter aid using hydrocyclones and then recycled [69].
In well-detoxified or completely noninhibiting acid hydrolyzates of lignocellulosic materials, exponential growth will be obtained after inoculation of the bioreactor. If the hydrolyzate is slightly inhibiting, there will be a relatively long lag phase during which part of the inhibitors are converted. However, if the hydrolyzate is severely inhibiting, no conversion of the inhibitors will occur, and neither cell growth nor fermentation will occur. A slightly inhibiting hydrolyzate can thus be detoxified during batch fermentation. However, very high concentration of the inhibitors will cause complete inactivation of the metabolism [18].
Several strategies may be considered for fermentation of hydrolyzate to improve the in situ detoxification in batch fermentation and obtain higher yield and productivity of ethanol. Having high initial cell density, increasing the tolerance of microorganisms against the inhibitors by either adaptation of cells to the medium or genetic modification of the microorganism, and choosing optimal reactor conditions to minimize the effects of inhibitors are among these strategies.
Volumetric ethanol productivity is low in lignocellulosic hydrolyzates when low cell-mass inocula are used due to poor cell growth. Usually, high cell concentration, e. g., 10 g/L dry cells, have been used in order to find a high yield and productivity of ethanol in different studies. In addition, a high initial cell density helps the process for in situ detoxification by the microorganisms, and therefore, the demand for a detoxification unit decreases. In situ detoxification of the inhibitors may even lead to increased ethanol yield and productivity, due to uncoupling by the presence of weak acids, or due to decreased glycerol production in the presence of furfural [21]. Adaptation of the cells to hydrolyzate or genetic modification of the microorganism can significantly improve the yield and productivity of ethanol. Optimization of reactor conditions can be used to minimize the effects of inhibitors. Among the different parameters, cell growth is found to be strongly dependent on pH [18, 21].
Crop description. Cyperus esculentus L.—commonly known as tigernut, chufa sedge, yellow nutsedge, and earth almond—belongs to the family Cyperaceae and grows in warm temperate to subtropical regions of the Northern Hemisphere (see Figs. 4.17 and 4.18). It can be found in Africa, South America, Europe, and Asia. It is a perennial herb, growing up to
90 cm high [138]. Tubers contain 20-36% oil. The oil from the tuber contains 18% saturated (palmitic acid and stearic acid) and 82% unsaturated (oleic acid and linoleic acid) fatty acids [138].
Main uses. The tubers are edible and have high nutritive value. They contain 3-15% protein, 15-20% sugar, 20-25% starch, 4-14% cellulose, and trace amounts of natural resin. They are used in Spain to make a beverage named horchata, and also consumed fresh after soaking. In other countries, the tubers are used in sweetmeats or uncooked as a side dish. New products obtained can enhance the interest in this crop
Figure 4.18 Cyperus esculentus L. (Photo courtesy of Peter Chen [www. cod. edu/people/faculty/ch enpe/PRAIRIE/2005_09_20/ Cyperus_esculentus. jpg].)
as a source of dietary fiber in food technology, as a high-quality cooking/ salad oil, as a source of starch, as an antioxidant-containing food, and so forth [139]. The oil extracted from yellow nutsedge can be used as food oil as well as for industrial purposes. Since the tubers contain 20—36% oil, the crop has been suggested as a potential oil crop for the production of biodiesel [138]. Preliminary tests using pure nutsedge oil as fuel in a diesel engine have indicated that the engine operated near its rated power [140]. Currently, it is being studied as an oil source for fuel production in Africa [53].
Alcohol can be used as a blend with gasoline as this has the advantage that the existing engines need not be modified and tetra-ethyl lead (TEL) can be eliminated from gasoline, due to the octane-enhancing quality of alcohol. If the engine is to be operated using only pure alcohol, then some major modifications are required in the engine and fuel system, as listed below:
1. Both alcohols and blends with gasoline are corrosive to many of the engine materials. These materials have to be changed.
2. Adjustment of the carburetor and fuel injection need to be made to compensate for the leaning effect.
3. Change in the fuel pump and circulation system need to be made to avoid vapor lock, as the methanol vaporization rate is very high.
4. Introduction of high energy ignition system with lean mixture.
5. Increase in compression ratio to make better antiknock properties of the fuel.
6. Addition of detergent and volatile primers to reduce engine deposits and assist in cold starting.
7. Use of cooler-running spark plugs to avoid preignition.
General properties of the blends are listed in Table 7.4. The volatility shown by the American Standard Testing Method (ASTM) distillation characteristics of petrol is a compromise between opposing factors to ensure good performance in petrol engines. This requires petrol to have a sufficiently lighter reaction and a 10% distillation temperature in order to start the engine as well as warm up, but the temperature should
TABLE 7.4 Evaluation of Ethanol and Gasohol against Petrol
|
not be so low that vapor-locking takes place and stops the engine due to the nonsupply of fuel. As far as volatility is concerned, ethanol-petrol blends are as good as petrol, if not better. Also gum resistance is greater than that of petrol. Aniline points for blends are lower, which indicates more aromatic content than petrol, due to the adding of ethanol to petrol, which helps to improve the octane number marginally. If a small quantity of water is introduced into a gasoline-alcohol blend, phase separation takes place, with gasoline-content in the upper phase and alcohol in the lower. This separation produces some undesirable effects. The alcohol-water mixture tends to pick up sediment and stall the engine on reaching the carburetor [4]. To improve the water tolerance of the blend, benzene and heptanes are added.
Since 1979, gasohol has been sold at 500 filling stations in the midwestern United States, where the corn from which alcohol is commonly made is abundant. This blend yields about the same mileage as unleaded gasoline and even offers an ever renewable source of energy. Moreover, if this blend were to replace gasoline, it could cut as much as 10% of the nation’s oil imports, which totalled $40 billion in 1979. This fuel has a good future in wealthy countries. The blends have some important advantages over pure ethanol, as listed below:
1. The starting difficulty can be removed.
2. There is no abnormal corrosion compared with pure ethanol.
3. Lubrication in a petrol-alcohol blend is more or less the same.
4. Some benzene is added to prevent separation of the layers of petrol and alcohol.
If blends are used, some minor modifications in the engine are required, as listed below:
1. The carburetor jet should be increased to increase the flow 1.56 times that of petrol.
2. The float has to be weighted down to correct levels due to higher specific gravity.
3. The air inlet should be modified to get less air as blends require less air for complete combustion than petrol.
4. Specific arrangement of heating the carburetor and intake manifold should be provided as lower vapor pressure of alcohol makes the starting difficult below 70°C.
The MCFC has evolved from work in the 1960s, aimed at producing a fuel cell that would operate directly on coal [23, 24]. Although direct operation on coal is no longer a goal, a remarkable feature of the MCFC is that it can directly operate on coal-derived fuel gases or natural gas and is therefore also called a direct fuel cell (DFC). MCFCs operate at high temperatures (600-650°C) compared to phosphoric acid (180-220°C) or PEM fuel cells (60-85°C). Operation at high temperatures eliminates the need for external fuel processors that the lower temperature fuel cells require to extract hydrogen from naturally available fuel. When natural gas is used as fuel, methane (the main ingredient of natural gas) and water (steam) are converted into a hydrogen-rich gas inside the MCFC stack (“internal reforming”) (see Fig. 9.9). High operating temperatures also result in high-temperature exhaust gas, which can be utilized for heat recovery for secondary power generation or cogeneration. MCFCs can therefore achieve a higher fuel-to-electricity and an overall energy use efficiency (>75%) than the low-temperature fuel cells. The MCFC
Fuel + steam
CO,
Internal
reforming
Anode
is a well-developed fuel cell and is a commercially viable technology for a stationary power plant, compared to other fuel cell types. A number of MCFC prototype units in the power range of 200 kW to 1 MW and higher are operating around the world. The cost and useful life issues are the major challenges to overcome before the MCFC can compete with the existing (thermal or other) electric power generation systems for widespread use.
Electrochemistry of MCFC. The electrochemical reactions occurring in the cell are:
Anode half reaction. At the anode, hydrogen reacts with carbonate ions to produce water, carbon dioxide, and electrons. The electrons travel through an external circuit—creating electricity—and return to the cathode.
H2 + CO32~ ^ H2O + CO2 + 2e~
Cathode half reaction. At the cathode, oxygen from the air and carbon dioxide recycled from the anode react with the electrons to form carbonate ions that replenish the electrolyte and transfer the current through the fuel cell, completing the circuit.
2 O2 + CO2 + 2e S CO3
The overall cell reaction is
H2 + 2 O2 + CO2 (cathode) s H2O + CO2 (anode)
If a fuel such as natural gas is used, it has to be reformed either externally or within the cell (internally) in the presence of a suitable catalyst to form H2 and CO by the reaction:
CH4 + H2O ^ 3H2 + CO
Although, CO is not directly used by the electrochemical oxidation, but produces additional H2 by the water gas shift reaction:
CO + H2O ^ H2 + CO2
Typically, the CO2 generated at the anode is recycled to the cathode, where it is consumed. This requires additional equipment to either transfer CO2 from the anode exit gas to the cathode inlet gas or produce CO2 by combustion of anode exhaust gas and mix with the cathode inlet gas.
Electrolyte. The MCFC uses a molten carbonate salt mixture as its electrolyte. At operating temperatures of about 650°C, the salt mixture is in a molten (liquid) state and is a good ionic conductor. The composition of salts in the electrolyte may vary but usually consist of lithium/potassium carbonate (Li2CO3/K2CO3, 62-38 mol%) for operation at atmospheric pressure. For operation under pressurized conditions, lithium/sodium carbonate (LiCO3/NaCO3, 52-48 or 60-40 mol%) is used as it provides improved cathode stability and performance. This allows for the use of thicker Li/Na electrolyte for the same performance, resulting in a longer lifetime before a shorting caused by internal precipitation. The composition of the electrolyte has an effect on electrochemical activity, corrosion, and electrolyte loss rate. Li/Na offers better corrosion resistance but has greater temperature sensitivity. Additives are being developed to minimize the temperature sensitivity of the Li/Na electrolyte. The electrolyte has a low vapor pressure at the operating temperature and may evaporate very slowly; however, this does not have any serious effect on the cell life. The electrolyte is suspended in a porous, insulating, and chemically inert ceramic (LiAlO2) matrix. The ceramic matrix has a significant effect on the ohmic resistance of the electrolyte. It accounts for almost 70% of the ohmic polarization. The electrolyte management in an MCFC ensures that the electrolyte matrix remains completely filled with the molten carbonate, while the porous electrodes are partially filled, depending on their pore size distributions.
Electrode. The anode is made of a porous chromium-doped sintered Ni-Cr/Ni-Al alloy. Because of the high temperatures resulting in a fast anode action, a large surface area is not required on the anode as compared to the cathode. Partial flooding of the anode with molten carbonate is desirable as it acts as a reservoir that replenishes carbonate in the stack during prolonged use. The cathode is made up of porous lithi — ated nickel oxide. Because of the high operating temperatures, no noble catalysts are needed in the fuel cell. Nickel is used on the anode and nickel oxide on the cathode as catalysts. Bipolar plates or interconnects are made from thin stainless steel sheets with corrugated gas diffusion channels. The anode side of the plate is coated with pure nickel to protect against corrosion.
Performance. At the high operating temperatures of an MCFC, CO is not a poison but acts as a fuel. In the MCFC, CO2 has to be added to oxygen (air) stream at the cathode for generation of carbonate ions. The anode reaction converts these ions back to CO2, resulting in a net transfer of two ions with every molecule of CO2. The need for CO2 in the oxidant stream requires that CO2 from the spent anode gas be separated and mixed with the incoming air stream. Before this can be done, any residual hydrogen in the spent fuel stream must be burned. Systems developed in the future may incorporate membrane separators to remove the hydrogen for recirculation back to the fuel stream to increase efficiency.
Internal reforming of natural gas and partially cracked hydrocarbons is possible in the inlet chamber of the MCFC, eliminating the separate fuel processing of natural gas or other hydrogen-rich fuels. The requirement for CO2 makes the digester gas (sewage, animal waste, food processing waste, etc.) an ideal fuel for the MCFC; other fuels such as natural gas, landfill gas, propane, coal gas, and liquid fuels (diesel, methanol, ethanol, LPG, etc.) can also be used in the MCFC system. The elimination of the external fuel reformer also contributes to lower costs, and high-temperature waste heat can be utilized to make additional electricity and cogeneration. MCFCs can reach overall thermal efficiencies as high as 85%.
With the increase in operating temperature, the theoretical operating voltage for a fuel cell decreases, but increases the rate of the electrochemical reaction and therefore the current that can be obtained at a given voltage. This results in the MCFC having a higher operating voltage for the same current density and higher fuel efficiency than a PAFC of the same electrode area. As size and cost scale roughly with the electrode area, the MCFC is smaller and less expensive than a PAFC of comparable output. Another advantage of the MCFC is that the electrodes can be made with cheaper nickel catalysts rather than the more expensive platinum used in other low-temperature fuel cells. Endurance of the cell stack is a critical issue in commercialization, and MCFC manufacturers report an average potential degradation of — 2 mV/1000 h over a cell stack lifetime of 40,000 h. The high temperature limits the use of materials in the MCFC, and safety issues prevent their application for home use. MCFC units require a few minutes of fuel burning at the start up to heat up the cell to its operating temperature and therefore are not very suitable for use in automobiles. However, they are very good for stationary power applications and units with up to 2 MW have been constructed, and designs for units with up to 100 MW exist [3, 23-25].
All forms of life are dependent on availability of energy at all levels, the creation, growth, and maintenance (defense, offense, and survival). The requirement and utilization of energy are mainly in two forms; the most important are nutrient and environmental energy in the form of heat and light.
It is easy to observe that extremely cold or hot regions are not favorable for the growth of living things. Likewise, the absence of light limits the propagation and proliferation of photosynthetic biotic species.
The sun, of course, radiates energy into space of which only an insignificant part is shared by this planet of ours called Earth. Because of its spin and its orbital rotation, a seasonal variation occurs in the total insolation on the earth’s surface, which averages approximately 20 kcal/(m2 • yr). The incident radiation comprises 2000-8000 A, 50% of which is in the visible range (3700-7700 A); only a small part of the incident energy is utilized by living systems.
Solar constants are given as 1.968 cal/(cm2 • min) = 3.86 X 1033 erg/s = 1.373 kW/m2. There are variations in the figures, depending on the source of information. However, the energy received on the earth’s surface is mostly thermal and wasted. Biological fixation is restricted to photophosphorylation.
Let us look at the components of ecosystems that are capable of utilizing incident energy and some interrelationships between them.
Autotrophs (meaning self-surviving), also known as producers, mainly the photosynthetic systems, are the largest users of sunlight. Theoretically, anywhere there is light they should grow, provided other inputs are favorable. In arid land, the lack of nutrients; in deserts, the lack of water; and at higher-altitude, low temperatures, low CO2 tension and other adverse conditions will prevent the proliferation of autotrophs, leaving otherwise sufficient insolation unutilized (energy fixation by photosynthetic pathway is treated elsewhere). Producers growing on detritus (dead organic materials) are not well described in the literature, but these could be autotrophs.
Heterotrophs (mixed surviving or unlike surviving), on the other hand, survive partly depending on the nutrient sources made available by other living systems. Most animals are heterotrophic. Therefore, animals are also called consumers.
If animals survive mainly on autotrophic materials, they are called primary consumers, commonly known as herbivores. If animals largely survive on other animals as their source of food, they are called secondary consumers, popularly known as carnivores. Predators are animals that hunt their animate food, known as prey. The prey-predator relationship plays an important role in nature and contributes to the ecologic balance.