## Results and Discussion

1. Results of optimisation

Results of optimisation is shown on fig. 5. Similar results are available for optimisation according to mirrors utilisation factor M. Analyses of results gave the evidence that for acceptance angles less than 20° and number of mirrors < 4 is more suitable optimisation according to C. As for practical realisation of concentrator it is expected to satisfy these limitations, calculation of the CLON will always be performed according to concentration C.

## Comparison of Experimental and Calculated Results

The errors between the experimental and calculated data values of efficiencies were verified by using the mathematical model of Eq.3.

The constants applicable to the Eq.3, were determined by using the computer Fortran

program. The numerical values of parameters are shown in Table.4.

The solar collector efficiency results show that there is an average deviation of 2.90% between the calculated and the experimental data. The mathematical model (Eq.3) validate the experimental results with minimum deviation of 0.14% at Vs=30m3/h/m2 and maximum deviation of 11.2% at Vs=20m3/h/m2 from the experimental data for all wind speeds.

Fig. 4. Relationship between collector efficiency and collector airflow at various wind speeds (experimental and calculated data).

5. Conclusion

The purpose of this indoor experimental work was to find evidence of the effect of changes in wind speed and suction velocity on the performance of an unglazed transpired solar collector. Our observations indicate that the peak collector efficiency occurs at zero-wind speed and low efficiencies occur between 1.6m/sec and 3.1m/sec wind speeds. The suction velocities and efficiencies result comparison show that, increasing suction velocities was results in an increases in efficiency. This is the support for our indoor experimental results that wind speeds and fluctuation in suction velocities has a strong influence on collector performance. We remain confident in our conclusions about the effects of wind speed on this system. It seems logical that wind speed is a dominant factor for affecting the efficiency of solar air heating collector. Our current efforts are directed towards finding a multivariable correlation, or model, to explain the indoor scatter experiment measurements. The experimental data were compared with the data obtained by the model. Satisfactory qualitative and quantitative
agreement was obtained between calculated and experimental data. The mathematical model could be deemed to be satisfactory for predicting the efficiency of the perforated solar collector at various wind speeds and suction velocities.

For further applications of the unglazed perforated solar air heating collector, we plan to build the solar wall system to avoid uncontrolled entry of outdoor air into offices and other working areas which is a cause of increased the heating costs.

## Technical description of the system

The research regards the development, design and application (installation), testing and monitoring and performance evaluation of a Low Temperature SORC system for sea (or brackish) water desalination. The system consists of the following sub-systems and components (Fig.1):

1) High efficiency vacuum tube solar collectors’ array

2) Circulator

3) Alternative thermal source (thermal wastes, geothermal or other)

4) Evaporator

5) Condenser

6) Economiser

7) Expanders

8) Pressurisation unit consists of 2 vessels V1, V2 three automatically controlled valves (VL1, VL2, VL3)

9) RO unit

10) Insulated seawater reservoir

11) Fresh water reservoir

12) RO energy recovery system

The system operation is described briefly below:

Thermal energy produced by the solar array (1) preheats and evaporates the working fluid (HFC-134a) in the evaporator surface (4). The water temperature at collector inlet is about 70 oC and the outlet temperature about 77 oC. The super-heated vapour is driven to the expanders (7) where the generated mechanical work drives the RO unit pumps (high pressure pump, cooling (heating) water pump, feed water pump) and circulating pump (2). The saturated vapour at the expanders’ outlet is directed to the condenser, after passing through an economiser (de-super heater) (5). On the condenser surface, seawater is pre­heated and directed to the seawater reservoir (10). Seawater pre-heating is applied to

increase the fresh water recovery ratio (in RO technology, higher feed water temperatures imply higher fresh water recovery ratio). The seawater tank is insulated. The use of seawater for condensation purpose on the condenser surface decreases the temperature of "Low Temperature Reservoir” of Rankine cycle thus a better cycle efficiency can be achieved. The saturated liquid at the condenser outlet is pressurised in the special pressurisation arrangement consists of two vessels and three valves (8) substituting a pump. The sub-cooled liquid at the pressurisation arrangement outlet is driven to the economiser. The economiser acts as working fluid pre-heater. In the economiser outlet saturated liquid is formed which is directed to evaporator inlet and the cycle is repeated.

An energy recovery system is coupled to the RO unit thus declining the energy consumption to 3 kWh/m3 product.

Below the thermodynamic analysis of the states described above is presented (Fig.1,2):

Table 1: States of Rankine cycle

 State T P H S (oC) (kPa) (kJ/kg) (kJ/kgoK) S1 Super-heated vapour, evaporator outlet, expander inlet 75.8 2200 435.7 1.7138 S2 Saturated vapour, expander outlet condenser inlet, isentropic expansion 35 887.91 417.5 1.7138 S3 Saturated liquid, condenser outlet 35 887.91 249.2 1.1676 S4 Sub-cooled liquid, pre-heater inlet «35 2200 «248.0 1.1676 S4’ Saturated liquid, evaporator inlet 71.7 2200 307.8 1.3433

Calculation of theoretical and actual efficiency of the system

rankine

AHq

AHW = Hsl — Hs2 AHq = Hsl — Hs3

hrankrne = °.°976

Where: n, Efficiency; H, Enthalpy; T, Temperature

The theoretical Organic Rankine system efficiency is 9.76 %

The Carnot cycle efficiency is 10.6 %

The actual system efficiency is estimated to 65% of theoretical that is 6.34 %.

For the prototype system 240 m2 of vacuum tube solar collectors will be deployed. Both the evaporator and condenser are plate heat exchangers of brazed type. The heat exchanger area of the evaporator is 6.8 m2, while that of condenser is 11.5 m2. For this number of collectors and considering a water recovery ratio of seawater RO desalination

SHAPE * MERGEFORMAT

Enthalpy (kj/kg)

Figure 2: Molier chart of Rankine cycle (working fluid states)

unit of 30%, the average yearly fresh water production is estimated at 1450 m3 (or 4 m3 daily)2. Table 2 presents the distribution of fresh-water production throughout a year.

Table ^ 2: Fresh water production (Average daily ^ water production (m3/day)

 Jan Febr Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec 0.81 1.98 2.96 4.76 5.76 5.85 6.72 6.98 5.86 3.54 2.18 0.89

## System description

Since 1997 the first solar assisted district heating system with duct heat store in Germany is being realised in Neckarsulm-Amorbach. The solar assisted district heating system presently supplies about 200 accommodation units with heat. For the final extension stage approximately 1,300 accommodation units were planned.

Presently 5,263 m2 solar thermal collectors are installed on different buildings as well as on a carport and a noise protection wall. The heat from the solar collectors is delivered to the heating plant and collected in buffer tanks which are used for short-term heat storage to balance peaks in heat delivery from the solar collectors, see figure 1.

The buildings are connected to the district heating system by a 3-pipe heat distribution net. The heat distribution net is supplied either by the buffer tanks or the duct heat store, depending on the temperature level. A gas condensing boiler supplies additional heat if none of the stores is able to deliver heat at the requested temperature level.

The duct heat store was extended twice and presently contains a volume of 63,360 m3 with 528 borehole heat exchangers (double-U-pipes, 30 m deep) for charging and discharging.

In table 1 an overview about the project history and the extension stages of the collector area and duct heat store volume is given.

## Result of Study III

7.1 Whole computational domains: sym­metrical configuration.- For these configu­rations, it was observed that spatial periodicity in each cell of the slats structure for A’ < 1.053 range exists, and that the behaviour of the variables «*, u* and T* was similar to cases when parallel slats were in contact with cold isothermal wall only. But in case of pressure, the pe­riodic behaviour was not obvious. Due to that fact two additional cases considering values of A = 30.5 and 60 and preserving values of A’ in 0.9528 were computated. In these new cases, it was demonstrated that distributions have had a completely periodic behaviour. Therefore, for symmetrical configurations the periodicity behaviour exists for all variables only when the overall aspect ratio A is higher than 20. In Fig. 4 the streamlines are pre­sented for cases studied.

7.2 Whole computational domains: asymmet­rical configurations close to hot isothermal wall.- It was demonstrated that spatial periodic­ity for each cell of the slats structure for all cases proposed in Table 2 exist.

7.3 Reduced computational domains: asym­metrical configurations close to hot isother­mal wall.- In Table 9 numerical results of the Nus — selt numbers obtained on whole computational domains are compared with the Nusselt numbers calculated on reduced domains. It was observed that the percentage differences |<й/|% increases with the decrease in A’.

An additional study was performed progres­sively increasing the value of from 20 to 86.696

and maintaining the values of the other parame­ters constant. Numerical results are presented in Table 10.

8.2 Verification.- For the finest meshes the

observed order of accuracy p approaches the theoretical values of the differential scheme used (between 1 and 3). The percentage of Richardson nodes obtained was high for Th = 30 and 70°С cases, but decreases in the case Th = 12й0С, where the physical phenomena was more complex. For all cases, the GCI values decrease as n increases. These results indicate that the estimator GCI is reliable only for Tft = 30 and 70°С cases.

8.3 Experimental setup.- A schematic of the setup is shown in Fig. 6. The internal dimen­sions of the cavity are = 300mm high, L = 70mm wide and F = 500mm deep. The slats consist of 25 rectangular glass sheets (dimensions are 1.5mm thick, 40mm high and 500mm deep). The rectangular sheets are distributed in a uniform manner, and are separated from the front and back plates by air gaps of lh = lc = 15mm.

Over the cold isothermal wall, an aluminum plate; type K thermocouples; another aluminum plate; a cooling system formed by a single-pass heat exchanger; and insulation mate­rial of armaflex were placed consecutively.

The hot isothermal wall structure consisted of: an aluminum plate; type K thermocouples; glued electrical heaters; and rock wool insulation material. The cavity was closed at its sides by lids covered with insulation material on the outside. Two glass windows were mounted on one side wall (window A and B, see Figs. 6a and 7), in order to allow the visualization of the air flow in the cavity.

Control, regulation and data acquisition were carried out with a data acquisition unit managed by a software applica­tion programmed in HPVEE language. The air is seed by aerosols of olive oil generated by a Laskin nozzle. The images of the flow were captured using a Digital Particle Image Ve- locimetry (DPIV). Errors of the measured velocities due to DPIV device, the data acquisition and the post-processing were expected to be below ± 0.0014 m/s.

## Simple Solar Systems for Heating, Hot Water and. Cooking in High Altitude Regions with. High Solar Radiation

C. MOller/K. Schwarzer/H. Kleine-Hering*
Solar-Institut JOlich / Solar Global e. V./ *Ecoandina
Heinrich-Mussmann-Str.5, 52428 JOlich
Tel.: (0049-2461) 99 35 70, Fax: (0049-2461) 99 35 70
E-Mail: c. mueller@sij. fh-aachen. de,

Internet: http://www. sij. fh-aachen. de

1. Introduction

In connection with a BMBF research project (FKZ 17104.01), a new system has been developed to provide solar heating and hot water. The system is designed to be used in areas with high solar radiation and low ambient temperatures, conditions which occur typically in high altitude regions. The main considerations in develop­ing this system were robust technology, low cost and easy maintenance. To ensure robustness, air is used as the heat transfer medium. Air has the advantage of a low thermal capacity and enables the system to be immediately ready for use, and does not have the disadvantages of water at temperatures below the freezing point. The units were installed in two public buildings in the Argentinean Altiplano at an alti­tude of 3600 m, as part of a BMZ (Ministry for Cooperation) project. The local partner in the project was Ecoandina.

Because of the high level of direct solar insolation in this area, concentrating solar cookers for families and institutions have a very high acceptance. As part of the BMZ project, four community cookers with Fixed-Focus reflectors (Scheffler reflec­tors) each with 3 kW power were installed. Further installations included solar hot water systems, drip irrigation systems with solar pumps and parabolic cookers for families. One of the villages equipped with these units is now to receive an award for being the first Solar Village in Argentina.

## Efficiencies of oil fired boilers and natural gas burners in practice

The efficiencies of a new oil fired boiler and new natural gas burners in one family houses were measured for long monitoring periods [2]. The boilers were the only available heating source in the investigated houses. In Fig 1, system efficiencies from 3 different sites on monitored during the last 2 years are shown. All boilers are of modern technology and they all were installed in the year 2002 and later. The system efficiency is calculated as (QDHW: Domestic hot water demand [kWh], Qsh: Space heating demand [kWh], Qfuel: Gas/Oil

consumption [kWh]): Qdhw + Qsh

Qfuel

## SIDE-BY-SIDE LABORATORY TESTS OF SMALL SDHW SYSTEMS

Two small low flow solar domestic hot water systems with mantle tanks as heat storage were tested side-by-side in a laboratory test facility. The systems are identical, with exception of the mantle tanks. One of the mantle tanks has the mantle inlet port located at the top of the mantle and the other mantle tank has the mantle inlet port moved 0.175 m down from the top of the mantle. Both of the two mantle tanks make use of electric heating elements as auxiliary energy supply systems, and the electric heating elements heat up the top volume to 51°C during all hours.

The solar collector in each system is identical and of the type ST-NA marketed by Arcon Solvarme A/S with an area of 2.51 m2.

The solar collector loop in both systems is equipped with a Grundfos circulation pump (type UPS 25-40), which has been running at stage 2 to secure a flow rate of about 0.5 l/min throughout the measuring period. The circulation pump is controlled by a differential thermostat, which measures the temperature difference between the outlet from the solar collector and the bottom of the mantle. The differential thermostat has a start/stop set point at 10/2 K.

The two solar heating systems were tested with the same daily hot water consumption of 0.100 m3. An energy quantity of 1.525 kWh, corresponding to 0.033 m3 of hot water heated from 10°C to 50°C, was tapped from each system three times each day: at 7 am, 12 am and 7 pm.

The test period was from the beginning of March to the middle of November 2003 with a duration of 252 days.

The data for the two SDHW systems are given in Table 1.

 Tank design Inner tank Hot water tank volume, [m3l 0.175 Inner height, [ml 1.45 Inner diameter, [ml 0.394 Tank wall thickness, [ml 0.003 Auxiliary volume, [m3l 0.063 Power of auxiliary energy supply, [Wl 1200 Mantle Mantle volume, [m3l 0.0319 Mantle height, [ml 0.7 Mantle gap, [ml 0.0335 Position of mantle inlet Top/0.175 m from top Inside diameter of mantle inlet, [ml 0.0189 Insulation Material Mineral wool Insulation top, [ml 0.13 Insulation side above/below mantle, [ml 0.06 Insulation side mantle, [ml 0.06 Insulation bottom, [ml 0.0 Solar collector Area, [m2l 2.51 Start efficiency, [-l 0.801 1st order heat loss coefficient, [W/m2Kl 3.21 2nd order heat loss coefficient, [W/m2K2l 0.013 Incident angle modifier (tangens equation) a = 3.6 Heat capacity, [J/mP-Kl 5339 Tilt, [°l 45 Orientation South Solar collector loop Pipe material Copper Outer diameter, [ml 0.010 Inner diameter, [ml 0.008 Insulation thickness (PUR foam), [ml 0.01 Length of pipe from storage to collector, indoor, [ml 4.6 Length of pipe from storage to collector, outdoor, [ml 13.3 Length of pipe from collector to storage, indoor, [ml 5.1 Length of pipe from collector to storage, outdoor, [ml 10.0 Solar collector fluid (propylene glycol / water mixture), [%l 40 Power of circulation pump, [Wl 50
 Table 1. Data for the two SDHW systems tested side-by-side.

The thermal performance of the two systems is compared by the net utilised solar energy and the solar fraction of the systems. The net utilised solar energy is defined as the tapped energy from the system minus the auxiliary energy supply to the tank, and the solar fraction is the ratio between the net utilised solar energy and the tapped energy from the system.

The measured energy quantities for the two systems are shown in Table 2. From Table 2, it is seen that the thermal performance of the system is not strongly influenced by the position of the mantle inlet. Both systems had a relatively high solar fraction (0.66-0.68) in the period. The thermal performance for the system with the lower mantle inlet was about 2% higher than the thermal performance of the system with the top inlet. The accuracy of the measured net utilised solar energy is within 4%.

10/11 2003.

At high solar fractions, large periods with high inlet temperatures to the mantle are expected and when the system with the lower mantle inlet has a higher thermal performance at high solar fractions, the relative improvement by moving the inlet down is expected to be higher for smaller solar fractions where lower inlet temperatures are expected.

The 252 days’ measuring period have been divided into 36 periods of 7 days. The performance ratio as a function of the solar fraction for the system with the top inlet for the 36 periods is shown in Fig. 2. The performance ratio is defined as the ratio between the net utilised solar energy of the system with the lower mantle inlet and the net utilised solar energy of the system with the top mantle inlet.

Fig. 2 shows, as expected, that the performance ratio increases for lower solar fractions. However, the performance ratio drops below 1 for two 7-day periods at solar fractions of 0.65-0.70, which can be explained by the distribution of the solar irradiance in these two 7- day periods. Each of the two 7-day periods has 4 days with a clear sky and 3 days more or less overcast, while the other 7-day periods, where the solar fraction is around 0.6-0.7 and the performance ratio is above unity, have clouds every day, which results in lower inlet temperatures to the mantle than on the days with a clear sky. Based on the tendency that the performance ratio increases for lower solar fractions and that the solar fraction was relatively high in most of the measuring periods, it can be concluded that these measurements show that the thermal performance of this SDHW system can be somewhat increased by moving the mantle inlet down.

Fig. 2. Performance ratio as a function of the solar fraction for the system with the top inlet.

## Design of hydraulic channels

serial, meandering structure is relatively high due to the channel length, it is lower in paral­lel structures. However, parallel structures can lead to a non-uniform flow distribution (de­pending on the ratio of the diameters and lengths of the risers and the header channels, [4, 5]).

In contrast to the mentioned designs, many natural hydraulic structures such as blood vessels or leaf venation show a multiple branched, fractal geometry. Since natural designs are optimised with respect to energy efficiency, the idea of transferring their construction principles to technical applications seems to be a promising approach (Fig. 1 c), [6]). If channel designs with both lower pressure drop and a uniform flow distribution can be ob­tained, it will be possible to rise the energy efficiency of heat exchangers.

## General methodology for durability assessment

The methodology adopted by Task 27 includes three steps: a) initial risk analysis of poten­tial failure modes, b) screening testing/analysis for service life prediction and microclimate characterisation, and c) service life prediction involving mathematical modelling and life testing.

Initial risk analysis

The initial risk analysis is performed with the aim of obtaining (a) a checklist of potential failure modes of the component and associated with those risks and critical component and material properties, degradation processes and stress factors, (b) a framework for the selection of test methods to verify performance and service life requirements, (c) a frame­work for describing previous test results for a specific component and its materials or a similar component and materials used in the component and classifying their relevance to

the actual application, and (d) a framework for compiling and integrating all data on avail­able component and material properties.

The programme of work in the initial step of service life assessment is structured into the following activities: a) Specify from an end-user point of view the expected function of the component and its materials, its performance and its service life requirement, and the in­tended in-use environments; b) Identify important functional properties defining the per­formance of the component and its materials, relevant test methods and requirements for qualification of the component with respect to performance; c) Identify potential failure modes and degradation mechanisms, relevant durability or life tests and requirements for qualification of the component and its materials as regards durability.

Table 1 Specification of end-user and product requirements for the booster reflectors stud­ied in IEA SHCP Task 27

 Function and gen- General requirements for In-use conditions and severity of envi- eral requirements long-term performance dur­ing design service time ronmental stress Efficiently reflect solar radiation to increase the solar gain of a flat plate solar collector Loss in material performance should not result in reduction of the solar system perform­ance with more than 5%, in relative sense, during the material service life. Material service life should exceed 25 years The reflector is exposed to open air condi­tions involving climatic stress of UV irradia­tion, high temperature, high humidity and moister, and the effect of icing. It may be exposed to corrosion promoting air pollutants and acid rain. It may also be subjected to mechanical loads from hail and wind, stress from mechanical fixing and due to its own weight Soiling agents, e. g. from birds, may effect performance as well as cleaning agents as required to maintain performance

Table 2 Specification of critical functional properties of booster reflectors and requirements set up by the IEA SHCP Task 27 group

 Critical functional Test method for determining functional Requirement for functional properties properties capability and long-term per- formance Reflectance (specu­lar, A pspec, and dif­fuse, Pdif) ASTM E903-96 „Standard test method for solar Absorptance, Reflectance, and Trans­mittance of Materials Using Integrating Spheres“ PC = 0.35-A pspec +(0.1/C)-Apdif < 0.05 with concentration ratio C=1.5 Adhesion between coating and sub­strate Visual assessment ISO 4624:2002 „Pull-off test for adhesion“ ISO 2409:1992 „Paints and varnishes — Cross cut test“ No blistering Adhesion > 1 MPa Degree 0 or 1

The first activity specifies in general terms the function of the component and service life requirement from an end-user and product point of view, and from that identifies the most important functional properties of the component and its materials. In Table 1 and Table 2 results are shown from the analysis made by the Task 27 group on booster reflectors. How important the function of the component is from an end-user and product point of view needs to be taken into consideration when formulating the performance requirements in terms of those functional properties. If the performance requirements are not fulfilled, the

particular component is regarded as having failed. Performance requirements can be for­mulated on the basis of optical properties, mechanical strength, aesthetic values or other criteria related to the performance of the component and its materials.

Potential failure modes and important degradation processes should be identified after failures have been defined in terms of minimum performance levels. In general, there exist many kind of failure modes for a particular component and even the different parts of the component and the different damage mechanisms, which may lead to the same kind of failure, may sometimes be quite numerous. In Table 3 an example from the Task 27 work on booster reflectors is presented.

Table 3 Potential failure modes and associated degradation mechanisms, degradation in­dicators and critical factors of environmental stress for booster reflectors identified by the IEA SHCP Task 27 group^_ ________________________________________________________________________

 Failure/Damage mode / Degradation mechanism Degradation indicator Critical factors of environmental stress Unacceptable loss in reflector performance PC= 0.35Aps+(0.1/1.5)APd) < 0.05 Degradation of the protec­tive layer Reflectance spectroscopy, visual inspection, TIS, FTIR, Film thickness measure­ment High humidity, high temperature, air pollutants (acid rain), UV irradiation, hail, wind Corrosion of the reflecting layer Reflectance spectroscopy, visual inspection, TIS High humidity, high temperature, air pollutants (acid rain), and impacts from other materials in contact with reflect­ing layer Surface abrasion Visual inspection, TIS Sand, dust, cleaning, icing, hail, touch­ing, scratching Surface soiling Reflectance spectroscopy, visual inspection, TIS Microorganisms, wind, dust, pollutants, birds, etc Degradation of the sub­strate Visual inspection, FTIR mechanical testing High humidity, high temperature, air pollutants (acid rain), UV irradiation, and impacts from other materials in contact with reflecting layer Loss of adhesion of pro­tective coating Visual inspection, Cross­cut testing High humidity, high temperature, air pollutants (acid rain), and UV irradia­tion Loss of adhesion of reflec­tor from substrate Visual inspection, Cross­cut testing High humidity, high temperature, air pollutants (acid rain), and UV irradia­tion

Fault tree analysis is a tool, which provides a logical structure relating failure to various damage modes and underlying chemical or physical changes. It has been used for the static solar materials studied in Task 27 to better understand observed loss in performance and associated degradations mechanisms of the different materials studied. In Figure 1 and Figure 2 are shown examples on how the different failure modes and associated deg-

radation mechanisms can be represented for booster reflectors and antireflective glazing materials.

 A. B1 Degradation of protective coating on reflector Insufficient coating of reflective layer at production

 Increase Increase C1 of of surface Corrosion of reflective layer absorp- rough- tion and ness scatter- ing
 Loss of reflector performance

Figure 1 Representation of failure modes and associated degradation mechanisms for booster reflectors from the IEA SHCP Task 27 study

The risk associated with each potential failure/damage is taken as the point of departure to judge whether a particular failure mode needs to be further evaluated or not. Risks may be estimated jointly by an expert group adopting the methodology of FMEA (Failure Modes and Efffect Analysis) [2,3]. In Table 4 the result of a risk analysis made by the Task 27 group on booster reflectors is presented.