Bikini solar combisystem design

The thermal performance of bikini solar combisystems is investigated for the Task 26 DHW profile for different H/D ratios of the tank. The insulation thickness is the same for all H/D ratios. The heat transfer area of the top and the bottom mantle is constant for all H/D ratios and the auxiliary set point temperatures are 55, 60 and 75°C for the low energy house, the house with medium space heating demand and the old houses. Fig. 7 shows net utilized solar energy for three different space heating systems with three different collector areas and H/D ratios of the tank. The H/D ratio of the tank does not play an important role when the heat transfer area is the same for all H/D ratios as long as the H/D ratio is higher than 2. For 3 m2 solar collector area a decreased space heating load results in an increased thermal performance of the system. This is due to the decreased set point temperature for the low space heating demands. For a collector area of 5 m2, the thermal performance in the house with the medium space heating demand is a little bit higher thermal performance of the system in the low energy house while the system has the lowest thermal performance in the old house. For a collector area of 8 m2, the thermal performance of the solar heating system in the house with medium space heating demand is a little higher than the thermal performance of the system in the house with low energy demand and higher than the thermal performance of the system in the old house.

H/D

=2,

Coll

area=

3 m2

H/D

=3,

Coll

area=

3 m2

H/D

=4,

Coll

area=

3 m2

H/D

2,

Coll

area=

5 m2

H/D

3,

Coll

area=

5 m2

H/D

4,

Coll

area=

5 m2

H/D

2,

Coll

area=

8 m2

—— H/D

3,

Coll

area=

8 m2

—— H/D

4,

Coll

area=

8 m2

Подпись: Space heating load [kWh/year]

Fig. 7. Net utilized solar energy versus H/D ratio for the bikini solar combisystem