. Results processing and computer models validation

Every transient was graphically display as a verification procedure, in order to identify anomalies that could lead to reproduce a test. The deviations in transients were numerically processed and presented as trend graphs. A sensitive analysis was performed and most sensitive parameters were identified.

A representative group of transients were selected, in order to check computer models.

Simulation models are in current development against a reference transient, without adjustment. When this contrast is clear, models will be compared against the representative group of transients. The information on specific models should be fed in CAREM modeling.

New dynamical experiments are planned, but the final selection will be based on the results of the contrast of the computer models against the representative group of transients.

3. CONCLUSIONS

An overview of the thermal hydraulic aspects of CAREM reactor was presented. The analytical dynamical studies and experimental facility, studies and results were briefly presented.

It was observed that around the operating point self-pressurized natural circulation was very stable, even with important deviation on the relevant parameters.