Simple model analysis

A second analytical step makes use of simple models. The response curves are decomposed in simple functions using a simple mathematical model based on the standard equations for diffusion in porous media.

Parameter

CnE-216

CnE-238

CnE-324

Breakthrough time (d)

117

117

117

Mean residence time (d)

176

213

217

Standard deviation (d)

24

63

64

Peak time (d)

132

185

159

Final time (d)

234

441

488

Tracer recovery (MBq)

2.2

67.3

28.5

Water recovery (%)

0.6

15.8

7.7

Note: Tracer did not arrived at wells CnE-253 and CnE-278 during the sampling period (285 d).

Подпись: REF
Подпись: 4p VVL tN vx
Подпись: 1
Подпись: C (x,t ) = C
Подпись: (14)
Подпись: e

where

C(x, t) is the tracer concentration as a function of distance and time (Bq/m3); tN is the normalized time;

D1 is the coefficient of dispersion (m2/d); v is the tracer velocity (m/d); x is the distance from the injection point (m);

CREF is the reference tracer concentration (Bq/m3).

Dispersivity may be calculated by multiplying the ratio (D1/vx) by the distance between the injection and production wells. Therefore, the extrapolated curve obtained before may be decomposed in two simple functions using Anduril software to give the curves shown in Fig. 33, where both functions and their sum are shown together with the experimental data.

The following table presents obtained results using Anduril software for the pair of wells CnE241-CnE324.

Parameter

Experimental

Model

Breakthrough time (d)

117

117

Mean residence time (d)

217

212

Standard deviation (d)

64

65

Peak time (d)

159

185

Final time (d)

488

488

Tracer recovery (MBq)

28.5

25.8

Water recovery (%)

7.7

7.0

image064

FIG. 33. Fitting curves for well CnE-324.

The decomposition in two curves may be explained by the fact that the tracer follows two different paths in its migration from the injector to the producer, each of them having different permeabilities.