Why sweet sorghum?

1.3 Agricultural advantages

1.3.1 Salt tolerance

Sorghum is characterized as moderately tolerant to salinity (Almodares and Sharif, 2005; Almodares and Sharif, 2007). Salinity reduces sorghum growth and biomass production. Salinity greatly reduced sorghum growth and this effect was more pronounced at 250 mM than at 125 mM NaCI (Ibrahim, 2004). However it was reported that sorghum growth was significantly reduced at all salinity levels from 50 to 150 mM (El-Sayed et al., 1994). Imposition of salt stress resulted in decreases in the percentage of seeds germinated (Almodares et al., 2007), although the strongest decline in germination occurred at the highest salt concentration (Table 2). Nevertheless, the development of high-yielding salinity tolerant sorghums is the best option to increase the productivity in soils (Igartua et al. 1994). Similarly, Gill et al. (2003) observed a great reduction in germination rate due to salt stress, in sorghum seeds at 37 °C in NaCl (-1.86MPa).

Relative percent germination(%)in osmotic potential (Mpa)created by NaCl

Cultivars

-0.4

-0.8

-1.2

-1.6

-2.0

-2

IS 9639

48d

4e

0f

0e

0b

0b

Sova

87.5abc

70abc

30de

12.5de

7.5b

7.5b

Vespa

80abc

51.5bcd

17ef

3de

0b

0b

S 35

83abc

74.5ab

54.5bcd

8.5de

3b

3b

M 81E

73bc

85.5a

36de

0e

0b

0b

IS 19273

81abc

46.5cd

29.5de

0e

0b

0b

IS 6936

87abc

77a

33.5de

5de

0b

0b

MN 1500

72.5bc

47.5cd

20ef

2.5de

0b

0b

Sumac

100a

62.5abcd

67.5abc

47.5ab

45a

45a

IS 686

63cd

40d

66abc

14de

0b

0b

SSV 108

87.5abc

85a

72.5ab

25bcde

5b

5b

Roce

87abc

74ab

89.5a

42abc

34.5a

34.5a

Sofrah

89.5ab

84a

53bcd

23.5bcde

5.5b

5.5b

Satiro

95ab

42d

32de

0e

5b

5b

IS 2325

89.5ab

77a

46cd

28bcd

0b

0b

E 36-1

62.5cd

42.5d

30de

2.5de

0b

0b

IS 6973

85.5 abc

74.5ab

71.5ab

20cde

23ab

23ab

SSV84

94.5ab

84.5a

64bc

64a

0b

0b

Values of letters (a, b,…) within each column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level, using Duncan multiple rang test.

Table 2. Effects of salinity on relative percent germination in 18 sweet sorghum cultivars (Quotation from Samadani et al., 1994).

According to Prado et al. (2000), the decrease in germination may be ascribed to an apparent osmotic ‘dormancy’ developed under saline stress conditions, which may represent an adaptive strategy to prevent germination under stressful environment. Germination time delayed with the increase in saline stress and root growth was more sensitive to salt stress than was germination (Gill et al., 2003). It seems that grain weight is related to salt tolerance in sweet sorghum. It showed that higher total seedling dry weight was obtained with larger seed size in 18 sweet sorghum cultivars under salt stress (Table 3 and Fig. 1). The presence of large genotypic variation for tolerance to salinity is reported in sorghum (Maiti et al, 1994). Sorghum seems to offer a good potential for selection, as intraspecific variation for germination under saline conditions (Table 2) or in the presence of other osmotic agents that has already been reported. Selection of salt tolerant cultivars is one of the most effective methods to increase the productivity of salinity in soils (Ali et al., 2004). By using these salt tolerant plants in breeding they produced progranuned an improved plant having higher chlorophyll concentration, more leaf area, early and better yield potential etc. The advancement of salinity tolerance during the early stages of sorghum growth been successfully accomplished through selection.

Cultivar

Thousand Grain Weight (g)

Total Seedling Fresh Weight (mg/20grain)

IS 9639

18.75

79

Sova

19.77

197

Vespa

15.35

180

S 35

30.63

349

M 81E

14.59

127

IS 19273

27.69

267

IS 6936

34.33

418

MN 1500

24.59

192

Sumac

12.63

81

IS 686

17.15

194

SSV 108

39.61

381

Roce

17.16

159

Sofrah

16.68

170

Satiro

15.21

246

IS 2325

31.35

335

E 36-1

33.33

434

IS 6973

38.52

344

SSV84

40.05

524

Table 3. Thousand Grain Weight (g) of 18 sweet sorghum cultivars and Total Seedlings Fresh weight (mg/20 grain) grown in osmotic potential (-0.4 Mpa) of NaCl after 12 day treatment (Quotation from Samadani et al., 1994).

Genotypes possessing salt tolerance characteristics will help in boosting up plants production in salt-affected soils (Ali et al., 2004). Azhar and McNeilly (1988) found that, for salinity tolerance of young sorghum seedlings, both additive and dominant effects were involved, the latter being of greater importance. Attempts have been made to evaluate salt tolerance at the germination and emergence stages in sorghum (Igartua et al., 1994). In fact, the variation in whole-plant biomass responses to salinity was considered to provide the best means of initial selection of salinity tolerant genotypes (Krishnamurthy et al, 2007). The presence of large genotypic variation for tolerance to salinity reported in sorghum (Krislmamurthy et al., 2007). There are large genotypic variations for tolerance to salinity in sorghum (Table 4). The other possible solution could be either using physical or biological practice (Gupta and Minhas, 1993). Sudhir and Murthy (2004) reviewed both multiple inhibitory effects of salt stress on photosynthesis and possible salt stress tolerance mechanisms in plants. Salinity reduced relative growth rates and increased soluble carbohydrates, especially in the leaves of salt sensitive genotype (Lacerda et al., 2005). In addition salt-stressed sorghum plants additionally accumulate organic solutes, like proline, glycinabetaine, sugars, etc. (Lacerda et al., 2001). The total soluble sugar increased in sorghum sap with increasing salinity level (Ibrahim, 2004; Almodares et al., 2008a). Sucrose content of plant parts is an indicator of salt tolerance (Juan et al., 2005). The imposition of strong water or salt stresses in sorghum has been demonstrated to be accompanied to an increase in the sugar levels of embryos, which may help in osmoregulation under stress conditions (Gill et al., 2003). The fructose level is always higher than glucose and sucrose levels in response to various salinity treatments (Gill et al., 2001; Almodares et al., 2008a).

image275